Trespass to Land Flashcards
Trespass to Land:
Define
The intentional direct interference with the claimant’s possession of land
Trespass to Land:
Claimant has to prove…
- Does C have Locus Standi?
- Has there been intentional direct interference?
- Causation and Remoteness
Trespass to Land:
Locus Standi
C must have exclusive possession of the land (ie proprietary owners; licensees in some cases and squatters)
Trespass to Land:
Licensees may have locus standi
Monsanto
Trespass to Land:
Squatters have locus standi
Delaney v TP Smith
Trespass to Land:
Has there been intentional direct interference?
This includes:
- Entering upon claimant’s land
- Acting in excess of permission to be on claimant’s land
- Bringing anything into direct contact with land
- Damaging C’s land
Trespass to Land:
Acting in excess of permission to be on claimant’s land
C may ask D to leave and D fails to do so within reasonable time; or
Whilst on land, D does something that is outside the scope of his permission (The Calgarth)
Trespass to Land:
Bringing anything into direct contact with land
This can include erecting a fence on neighbour’s land; or
Resting a ladder against other’s wall
Trespass to Land:
Defining Land
Land includes:
- Surface of the land;
- The buildings on it
- Plants in it;
- sub-soil beneath it (Bocardo v Star Energy)
- rights to airspace (subject to Berstein v Skyviews)
Trespass to Land:
Bernstein v Skyviews
Right to airspace to ‘such heights as is necessary for the ordinary use and enjoyment of the land and the structures on it’
Trespass to Land:
Trespass to land claim against aircraft not possible
Bernstein v Skyviews
Trespass to Land:
Claims against large signs are possible where they have entered the claimant’s airspace
Kelsen v Imperial Tobacco
Trespass to Land:
Claims against cranes are possible, where they have entered the claimant’s airspace
Anchor Brewhouse
Trespass to Land:
Trespass must be a voluntary act
Smith v Stone
Trespass to Land:
D need not know or intend to trespass
Basely v Clarkson