Treatment/Prognosis Flashcards

1
Q

What % of CC and GB cancers are potentially resectable Dz at presentation?

A

Intrahepatic: 30%–90%

Hilar: ∼50%

Distal extrahepatic: 80%–90%

GB cancer: 10%–30% of preoperatively diagnosed pts (most are incidentally diagnosed)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the classification system used to determine resectability of hilar CC?

A

Bismuth classification; type IV is unresectable

Type I/II: involving CBD without involving left/right hepatic ducts

Type III: involving either left or right hepatic duct in addition to CBD

Type IV: involves both left and right hepatic ducts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the surgical approach for each subtype of CC and GB cancer?

A

The surgical approach depends on site:

Intrahepatic: usually requires a lobectomy.

Hilar: at least lobectomy, resection of extrahepatic bile duct, roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy, and LN staging.

Distal extrahepatic: pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple) with LN staging

GB cancer: extended cholecystectomy with LN staging

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When is a routine cholecystectomy sufficient Sg for an incidentally diagnosed GB cancer?

A

Following cholecystectomy for presumed benign Dz, pts with T1a (not beyond the lamina propria) GB cancer do not require a 2nd oncologic resection. 5-yr OS rates approach 100%.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How is an extended cholecystectomy different from a routine cholecystectomy?

A

Extended cholecystectomy should include en bloc resection of GB, liver segments IVb and V, and regional LN dissection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What 2nd Sg should be performed after ≥T1b GB cancer is discovered on cholecystectomy?

A

After cholecystectomy for presumed benign Dz, pts with incidental ≥T1b GB cancer require radical re-resection of the GB bed (2-cm margins), regional nodes, and port sites.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Is liver transplantation more appropriate for IHCC or for EHCC?

A

Liver transplantation is generally contraindicated for IHCC (d/t poor outcomes); transplantation shows promise in well-selected, early-stage, hilar/extrahepatic Dz. (Rea DJ et al., Ann Surg 2005)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the 5-yr survival for pts after resection +/- RT or CRT?

A

IHCC: 17%–40% (MS 26–37 mos)

Hilar CC: 10%–35% (MS 14–37 mos)

Distal EHCC: 23%–50% (MS 18–36 mos)

GB cancer (T3–T4): 0%–45% (MS 23–58 mos)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What prospective data exist supporting adj CRT in CC or GB cancer?

A

Adj Gem + cape × 4 cycles f/b concurrent cape + EBRT to 45 Gy to LN and 54–59.4 Gy to tumor bed resulted in MS of 35 mos in the SWOG 0809 phase II trial of pT2–4 or N+ EHCC and GB cancer. (Ben-Josef E et al., JCO 2015)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the recommended adj Tx for localized GB cancer?

A

Acceptable options for R0 resections include observation, 5-FU–based CRT, 5-FU or gemcitabine-based chemo alone, or clinical trial enrollment. Retrospective series and meta-analyses suggest that adj CRT or chemo alone may benefit resected GB cancer pts. Pts with N+, R1, or > stage I pts deriving the most benefit. (Kresl JJ et al., IJROBP 2002; Ben-David MA et al., IJROBP 2006; Czito BG et al., IJROBP 2005; Yu JB et al., JCO 2008; Gold DJ et al., IJROBP 2009; Horgan AM et al., JCO 2012; Yamanaka K et al., Int JCO 2015; Ma N et al., BMC Cancer 2015; McNamara MG et al., Am JCO 2015)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the Tx approach for localized, unresectable GB cancer?

A

The approach is similar to unresectable pancreatic cancer: a combination of systemic chemo alone and/or CRT. Gemcitabine and cisplatin is the reference systemic regimen.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the recommended adj Tx for localized, resectable CC with good PS?

A

Single-institution series suggest that 5-FU or gemcitabine-based CRT is an appropriate adj Tx for localized resectable CC. (Hughes MA et al., IJROBP 2007; Nelson JW et al., IJROBP 2009; Shinohara T et al., IJROBP 2008; Kim TH et al., IJROBP 2011) This is also appropriate for unresectable CC. (Pitt HA et al., Ann Surg 1995)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Does neoadj CRT improve survival in biliary cancer?

A

Prospectively collected single institution retrospective data suggest NA gemcitabine × 3 cycles and 50–60 Gy (2 Gy/fx) improves 3-yr RFS (78% vs. 58%, p = 0.02) and OS (p = 0.002, HR 0.35) compared to Sg alone. (Kobayashi S et al., Eur J Surg Oncol 2017)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the recommended Tx for localized, unresectable CC?

A

A combination of chemo alone and/or CRT is recommended for definitive Tx of unresectable CC. (Urego M et al., IJROBP 1999; Leong E et al., J GI Cancer 2012; Morganti AG et al., IJROBP 2000; Crane CH et al., IJROBP 2002; Ben-David MA et al., IJROBP 2006; Tao R et al., JCO 2016; Hong TS et al., JCO 2016)

Gem + cisplatin is sup to gemcitabine alone in a phase III RCT (ABC-02) of locally advanced or metastatic CC or GB cancer (Valle J et al., NEJM 2010), with MS 11.7 mos vs. 8.1 mos.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What evidence supports hypofractionated RT or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in unresectable CC?

A

Phase II data show 2-yr LC of 94.1% for IHCC treated to 67.5 Gy in 15 fx (Hong TS et al., JCO 2016). Retrospective data suggest an MS of 30 mos and 3-yr OS of 73% vs. 38% when treating with hypofractionated or SBRT to a dose generating a biologic effective dose of >80.5 Gy10 (3–30 fx, 35–100 Gy). (Tao R et al., JCO 2016)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define target structures and doses for adj Tx for GB, hilar & EHCC.

A

For resected GB, hilar and EHCC, SWOG S0809 defined the CTV by the LN basin (initial volume, 45 Gy in 1.8 Gy/fx) and surgical bed (boost volume, 9 Gy for R0 & up to 14.4 Gy for R1). An SIB was allowed with 52.5–55 Gy in 25 fx. Regional basins were defined as retropancreaticoduodenal, celiac, and portal vein nodes for all pts; consider including regional LN basins by site as defined above in the 18th question under workup/staging.

17
Q

Define target structures and doses for adj Tx for IHCC cancer.

A

Same as above, except for adj IHCC regional LN basin is dependent on tumor location. Left sided: inf phrenic, hilar (pericholedochal, hepatic artery, portal vein, and cystic duct), and gastrohepatic. Right sided: hilar, periduodenal, and peripancreatic LN basin may be limited to pericholedochal LNs if LND was negative at Sg.

18
Q

What is the target and dose for definitive RT of CC and GB cancer?

A

For hilar/EHCC, the CTV includes the gross Dz + margin and the LN basin (controversial). For IHCC and GB cancer, the CTV includes the gross Dz + margin only. Gross Dz is treated to the highest dose possible, considering OARs, usually ∼60 Gy in 1.8–2 Gy/fx.

19
Q

What are the transarterial Tx approaches for CC and in which Dz subset have they been utilized?

A

Transarterial embolization, chemoembolization, and radioembolization have been studied in unresectable IHCC. A large retrospective study examined these modalities in 198 pts with unresectable IHCC (Hyder O et al., Ann Surg Oncol 2013). MS was 13.2 mos and did not differ based on therapy.

20
Q

Which vessel is used to radioembolize liver tumors and why?

A

The hepatic artery is used for embolization because it is the major blood supply to liver tumors, unlike normal liver tissue, which derives its supply primarily from the portal vein.

21
Q

What is the most used radioisotope for radioembolization in CC? What are its properties?

A

Yttrium-90-labeled microspheres made of glass or resin are used for radioembolization. Yttrium-90 undergoes a-decay, with a half-life of 64 hrs (2.7 days).