Treatment in PPA Flashcards
T or F: There is a lack of computer based language studies for post-stroke aphasia
False - there is an abundance of studies looking at post-stroke but limited information on how to slow loss of words in individuals with NPPA
What is the rationale for using computer based language studies (MossTalk) in NvPPA?
- computer based treatment found efficacious
- cued naming found effective in Tx for anomia
- orthography found helpful in aphasia therapy
- combo of orthographic and phonological cues helpful in treatment of phonologically based anomia
In the MossTalk program, a picture of a raccoon is shown with the letter R below (orthographic clue). When is the full word ‘raccoon’ shown to the participant?
-whether they named the animal or correctly or not, the name shows up under the image
In PPA therapy, if you see _________ its great. If you see _______ this is a ‘big deal’
maintenance
improvement
From the MossTalk experiment, the 2 participants showed post-tx effects _______ later and marginal maintenance _________ post-tx
4 weeks
6 months
What are the conclusions about MossTalk for NPPA?
- both patients benefitted (to diff degrees) from a computer based treatment for anomia
- effectiveness of treatment for anomia in NPPA comparable or better to post-stroke anomia (looking at maintenance)
- computer based treatment may be viable Tx approach for patients who suffer from PPA in absence of generalized cognitive impairment
For the study looking at treatment for anomia in SvPPA, what were the 3 subsets of words
1) could name & comprehend
2) couldn’t name but could comprehend
3) couldn’t not and couldn’t comprehend
In the treatment of anomia in SPPA, what were the methods of tx?
-A card with a picture of an item AK wanted to learn, on the other side was a description of the item that was personally salient
Explain what happened to the words on the control list (words she could comprehend and name but that she wasn’t trained on).
-There was a decrease in naming accuracy of words she knew at the start (~25% decrease)
What happened to AK’s naming accuracy scores to words that she could understand and name and that were targeted during treatment?
They remained at 100%, indicating that treatment of known words can help prevent loss of words in PPA.
In the Tx of SPPA, what happened to the words that AK could understand but not name?
-went from 0% accuracy pre-tx to 60% post-tx
In the Tx of SPPA, what happened to the words that AK couldn’t’ understand and couldn’t name?
went from 0% pre-tx to 35% post-tx
Based on the results from AK’s treatment for SPPA, is it better to work on words that a patient knows but can’t name or words a patient doesn’t understand and can’t name
- words they understand but can’t name
- you only have to help them relearn the word, compared to teaching comprehension and the name
- this group of words had higher naming accuracy for AK compared to words she couldn’t understand or name
What were the conclusions from the treatment of AK’s SvPPA using pictures?
- improvement after Tx
- effects maintained six months later
- slower forgetting of treated words
What 3 factors affect success in therapy of word naming?
- personal familiarity with items (linked to patients autobiographical experience) affects remembering
- organizing words into semantic categories is more helpful than organizing them alphabetically
- partially spared semantic knowledge facilitates relearning