Treatment Flashcards
What do physicians expect of us when they send a patient for OAT (what are the treatment goals)?
Reduce AHI
Increase SpO2 to normal
Reduction of symptoms (fatigue, morning headache that goes away with ambulation, bruxism [can cause mroning headaches that worsen], snoring, RLS, impotence)
What is considered a successful AHI outcome?
AHI<10 with no symptoms (partial response)
AHI reduced by ≥50% in severe cases with improvement in symptoms (partial response)
Discuss with physician what he perceives as success before treating
What is considered a successful outcome in terms of SaO2?
Depends on the group:
Nadir >85%
SaO2 <1 minute
Nadir ≥90% (most widely accepted and probably the most accurate)
Somnomed pros, cons
Pros: lightweight, easy A/P adjustment, high compliance, can be used in edentulous patients
Cons: dorsal fin breakage, no lateral movement (not good for brux/clench), high cost for Somnomed brand (other brands of dorsal fin are available)
EMA (elastic mandibular appliance) pros, cons
Pros: thin (tongue space, gaggers), lower cost, lateral movement, tongue space, A/P movement. Roubal recommends for all patients AHI<15, and for all that do not respond with TAP (he says 70% of TAP non-responders will respond with EMA)
Cons: in bruxers the bands only last a couple of weeks (bands must be replaced frequently), bands lengthen over time (decreases protrusion); appliance life expectancy 2 years
TAP pros and cons
Pros: easily adjustable, lateral movement
Cons: tongue rests on mechanism; difficult to adjust vertical
Oasys pros and cons
Pros: both a mandibular repositioner and a nasal dilator, excellent for allergy patients
Cons: no lateral movement, molar advancement tubes strip easily, impression of vestibules is critical for nasal buttons
Full Breath pros and cons
Pros: no mandibular advancement needed (good for TMJ); single arch
Cons: very difficult to titrate (posterior tongue restrainer); bd for gaggers; can make swallowing difficult
SilentNite pros and cons
Pros: good tongue space, inexpensive, good trial appliance
Cons: only FDA approved for snoring, breaks easily, not good for bruxers
Tongue retaining device (TRD) pros and cons
Pros: inexpensive, good for edentulous, good for those who can’t tolerate mandibular advancement
Cons: lingual frenum sensitivity
What is the most critical consideration when choosing which appliance to use?
Only use an appliance that has FDA approval
Do all patients physiologically respond positively to mandibular repositioning appliances?
No. Some people simply will not see an increase in their airway.
What is Dr. Weaver’s protocol for titration?
Acclimate for 1 week
If symptoms are better, HST
If symptoms are not reduced, advance .5mm every day until symptoms improve
If TMJ symptoms arise, revert back to last comfortable size, wait 1 week and advance .5mm weekly
If TMJ symptoms prevent good outcome, treat the TMJ (daytime orthotic)
Final HST or PSG scored by physician – report success to physician – inform patient that decision about final sleep study is the physician’s decision
Follow up appointment protocol per Dr. Weaver
Review chief complaints (same, gone, or new) – fatigue (Epworth), snoring, headache, TMJ, comfort of appliance
Review medical hx
TMJ check, ROM, muscles
Changes in occlusion
Check appliance for wear, damage, etc.
HST every year (he says – I think only PRN)
Report to physician
How many OSA patients have TMJ?
30%