Treatment Flashcards

1
Q

What do physicians expect of us when they send a patient for OAT (what are the treatment goals)?

A

Reduce AHI
Increase SpO2 to normal
Reduction of symptoms (fatigue, morning headache that goes away with ambulation, bruxism [can cause mroning headaches that worsen], snoring, RLS, impotence)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is considered a successful AHI outcome?

A

AHI<10 with no symptoms (partial response)
AHI reduced by ≥50% in severe cases with improvement in symptoms (partial response)
Discuss with physician what he perceives as success before treating

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is considered a successful outcome in terms of SaO2?

A

Depends on the group:
Nadir >85%
SaO2 <1 minute
Nadir ≥90% (most widely accepted and probably the most accurate)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Somnomed pros, cons

A

Pros: lightweight, easy A/P adjustment, high compliance, can be used in edentulous patients
Cons: dorsal fin breakage, no lateral movement (not good for brux/clench), high cost for Somnomed brand (other brands of dorsal fin are available)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

EMA (elastic mandibular appliance) pros, cons

A

Pros: thin (tongue space, gaggers), lower cost, lateral movement, tongue space, A/P movement. Roubal recommends for all patients AHI<15, and for all that do not respond with TAP (he says 70% of TAP non-responders will respond with EMA)
Cons: in bruxers the bands only last a couple of weeks (bands must be replaced frequently), bands lengthen over time (decreases protrusion); appliance life expectancy 2 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

TAP pros and cons

A

Pros: easily adjustable, lateral movement
Cons: tongue rests on mechanism; difficult to adjust vertical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Oasys pros and cons

A

Pros: both a mandibular repositioner and a nasal dilator, excellent for allergy patients
Cons: no lateral movement, molar advancement tubes strip easily, impression of vestibules is critical for nasal buttons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Full Breath pros and cons

A

Pros: no mandibular advancement needed (good for TMJ); single arch
Cons: very difficult to titrate (posterior tongue restrainer); bd for gaggers; can make swallowing difficult

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

SilentNite pros and cons

A

Pros: good tongue space, inexpensive, good trial appliance
Cons: only FDA approved for snoring, breaks easily, not good for bruxers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Tongue retaining device (TRD) pros and cons

A

Pros: inexpensive, good for edentulous, good for those who can’t tolerate mandibular advancement
Cons: lingual frenum sensitivity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the most critical consideration when choosing which appliance to use?

A

Only use an appliance that has FDA approval

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Do all patients physiologically respond positively to mandibular repositioning appliances?

A

No. Some people simply will not see an increase in their airway.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is Dr. Weaver’s protocol for titration?

A

Acclimate for 1 week
If symptoms are better, HST
If symptoms are not reduced, advance .5mm every day until symptoms improve
If TMJ symptoms arise, revert back to last comfortable size, wait 1 week and advance .5mm weekly
If TMJ symptoms prevent good outcome, treat the TMJ (daytime orthotic)
Final HST or PSG scored by physician – report success to physician – inform patient that decision about final sleep study is the physician’s decision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Follow up appointment protocol per Dr. Weaver

A

Review chief complaints (same, gone, or new) – fatigue (Epworth), snoring, headache, TMJ, comfort of appliance
Review medical hx
TMJ check, ROM, muscles
Changes in occlusion
Check appliance for wear, damage, etc.
HST every year (he says – I think only PRN)
Report to physician

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How many OSA patients have TMJ?

A

30%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the way to treat TMD in OAT patients?

A
  1. Diagnose the TMD prior to OAT therapy & inform the patient
  2. If no TMD prior but it arises during OAT, treat the TMD (daytime orthotic)
  3. If TMD is present prior to OAT, give patient options: inform of the TMJ issues, talk about daytime appliance and OAT
17
Q

Clinical goals of TMD treatment?

A
Reduce or eliminate pain
Improve ROM
Recapture dislocated discs (uncommon)
Eliminate inflammation
Restore correct swallow
Reduce parafunctional activity (generally improves when airway and/or pain improves)
18
Q

TMD treatment modalities?

A
Splint therapy (daytime and/or nighttime)
Physical therapy
Chiropractor
Trigger point therapy
Myofunctional therapy
19
Q

EPAP (Provent)

A

Shows significant improvement in AHI. Probably a very good adjunct to OAT in nasal breathers who are unable to achieve optimal results with OAT alone.

20
Q

OAT and CPAP combo therapy advantages

A

Reduce PAP pressure by 4-5 cwp
Effective in preventing mouth leaks
Can hold nasal pillows instead of using head straps
Can be ‘bulked out’ in the cheek area to limit air leaks if flaccid tissue.
Augment Efficacy of OAT with Adjunctive Air Pressure
More Stable/Comfortable Mask Fit

21
Q

How effective is A&T alone in the treatment of OSA in children?

A

AT largely improves the AHI of children with OSA • Residual OSA in children undergoing AT is likely in the context of children with severe underlying OSA and/or obesity
Older children and obese children are particularly increased risk for residual OSA • Similarly non-obese children with either severe OSA or with asthma are at an increased risk for residual OSA.

22
Q

Which treatment modality is better in insomnia: CBT-I or pharmaceuticals?

A

They were comparable in all measures except sleep onset, in which CBT-I was better
(Smith et al. 2002)

23
Q

What are the common components of CBT-I?

A

Stimulus control & sleep restriction (overwhelming empirical support)
Sleep hygiene (ineffective as a monotherapy)
Relaxation therapy (not as effective as SCT and SRT)
Bright light therapy
Cognitive therapy

24
Q

What is the theory behind stimulus therapy (in CBT-I)?

A

Minimize activities in the bedroom to sleep and sex.
No other activities (condition the mind to expect only 2 possibilities)
No eat, read, lie awake, worry, work, TV in bed(room)

25
Q

What are the stimulus control instructions (CBT-I)?

A

Decondition Arousal & Re-associate Bed With Sleep • Do not use your bed or room for anything but sleep or sex • Go to bed only when sleepy • If not asleep in 15-20 mins get out of bed • Return to bed only when sleepy • Repeat as often as necessary • Get up at the same time every day! • No napping

26
Q

What is the theory behind sleep restriction therapy (CBT-I)?

A

Uses Sleep Debt to Consolidate Sleep

27
Q

What are the sleep restriction instructions?

A

1) Fix Rigid wake time
2) Curtail Sleep Opportunity to match TST
3) Titrate 15 min. weekly bedtime advances contingent of SE = 95% benchmark
Example: insomniac in bed from 11-10, TST of 5 hours, with delayed sleep onset and 3 awakenings plus lying in bed before getting up in the morning – Week 1 stay up until 2, get up at 7, Week 2 to bed a 1:45 and up at 7, etc.

28
Q

What are the published success rates of OAT?

A

Overall 50%
Mild/Mod = 75%
Severe = <50%, unpredictable

29
Q

Is OAT (TAP-1) or CPAP more effective, according to a 2 year randomized clinical study published in Sleep?

A

The results of this study indicate that, regarding treatment success, there is no significant difference between oral appliance therapy and CPAP in treating mild to severe OSAS in a 2-y follow-up. CPAP, however, showed a tendency toward a higher (nonsignificant) overall success rate than oral appliance therapy. This tendency was most pronounced in patients with severe OSAS. Both therapies had positive effects on polysomnographic variables during follow-up but CPAP therapy was significantly more effective in improving the AHI and the lowest oxyhemoglobin saturation levels at 1- and 2-y follow-up. (Vol 36 issue 9, http://journalsleep.org/ViewAbstract.aspx?pid=29087)

30
Q

For whom is OAT recommended, according to a 2013 Sleep article?

A

the current literature increasingly supports MAS as an effective alternative to CPAP except for extremely and morbidly obese persons. Future studies focused on long-term comparative effectiveness outcomes that include objective measures of adherence as well as the consideration of informed patients’ preferences for treatment are required for the comparisons between CPAP and MAS treatment.(Almeida FR. Long-term effectiveness of oral appliance versus CPAP therapy and the emerging importance of understanding patient preferences. SLEEP 2013;36(9):1271-1272.)

31
Q

What should be the most important factor in deciding between OAT and CPAP?

A

Patient choice of treatment. “the recent crossover study by Phillips et al. gives some insight into the impact of such an approach in OSA.11 They found that in retrospect, nearly half of patients preferred MAS and importantly, adherence to both CPAP and MAS were higher in patients who preferred the corresponding options” (Almeida FR. Long-term effectiveness of oral appliance versus CPAP therapy and the emerging importance of understanding patient preferences. SLEEP 2013;36(9):1271-1272.)

32
Q

What is the “magic number” on the pharyngometer?

A

120

33
Q

What should you do when the pharyngometer only shows improvement at 16mm?

A

Phonetic bite. We’ve had great results with it; let the patient know that because the airway showed no changes with pharyngometer, our odds of success are diminished. However, we have had great results when using the phonetic bite.

34
Q

Patients will often initially feel more fatigued when apnea treatment is successful, but if they keep at it they will turn the corner and start feeling better. We don’t know why, but what are some of the theories?

A

 “Sleep debt” needs to be repaid?
 Feeling more energy, patients accomplish more, leading to fatigue?
 Mouthful of acrylic leads to arousals? Mouthful of acrylic leads to arousals?
 The body craving this newfound, healthful sleep?

35
Q

How often does fatigue remain in successfully treated CPAP patients?

A

55%. In other words, we can’t expect that every fatigued apnea patient will feel more rested or energetic, nor should we base our HST on that.