Trade barriers question Flashcards
Protectionism
The act of guarding a country’s business from foreign competition, by imposing restrictions on free trade.
Why might a country use Protectionism?
-Reduce Trade Deficit/ BoP ( as Imports are reduced)
-Protect Infant Industries (like babies, need support, high costs at start)
-Retaliation (to other countries policies)
-Protect Jobs
-Raise government tax revenue (usually secondary benefit, not main objective)
-Response to dumping
-Protect Strategic Industries
4 Main Ways the Government protects the businesses in thier country
-Tariffs
-Quotas
-Subsidy
-Other
Tariffs
A tariff is a tax imposed on imported goods. The effect is to raise the price to the consumer, leading to a fall in demand. This may mean that consumers will switch consumption from imports to domestically produced subsidies.
Tariff Diagram - Before Tariff
- We assume other countries can supply at a lower price and it is assumed that price is elastic - the country can import as much as they want at the going world price. With free trade domestic suppliers will produce at Q2. Domestic demand will be at Q3. The difference is filled with imports due to domestic demand being higher than domestic supply.
Tariff Diagram - After Tariff
Tariff is introduced by the government, increasing world prices. At this price, there is likely to be a contraction in demand but also an extension of supply as businesses are encouraged to produce more at this increased price. Imported goods will reduce, and domestic supply will increase. Increased Prices for domestic consumers, however. The shaded box is the government revenue from importing tariffs.
Positives of Introducing Tariffs
On the face of it the government has achieved its objectives:
-Imports reduced
-Domestic businesses have increased supply
-Domestic Jobs have been maintained/ potentially increased
-Government had gained also from increased tax revenue
Drawbacks of Introducing Tariffs
-Consumers are worse off as they pay a higher price for the good
-They consume less and there is a loss of consumer surplus.
So therefore:
-Consumer surplus has reduced
-Producer Surplus has increased
-However there is deadweight loss to society
Deadweight loss
-Cost to society created by market inefficiencies, which occurs when supply and demand are out of equilibrium
Tariffs - Society
-Consumers are worse off- this is represented by the various shaded areas below the Pw = tariff supply line.
-Some of the previous consumer surplus has been redistributed to others in society ie government revenue and producer surplus.
-But there is still a welfare loss represented by two red triangles
-In other words societies worse off by the imposition of a tariff as consumers are in reality paying a higher price for there goods.
-NB The impact of the tariff will depend upon the elasticity of demand and supply in the domestic market
Quotas
An Import quota is a limit on the total quantity of a product can be supplied to a market. An import quota therefore restricts the supply of an imported product. By cutting market supply the price of the imported product is likely to rise and black market may develop. Quotas limit market access to imported.
Quota Diagram
Other countries are prepared to export any amount at the world price (assumption) without a quota, domectic producers would be prepared to supply at S0 and demand at D0 at the world price.
By imposing a quota, total supply is now given by Sd + quota which is domestic supply + the quota of imports allowed into the economy from country A.
Arguments to use tariffs
-To protect strategic industries or sectors from foreign competition ( CAP/ Defence).
-To protect jobs maybe in struggling/less efficient industries- sunset industries (however this is likely to be just putting off the inevitable and certainly goes against the theory of comparative advantage)
-To raise tax revenue
-To deter dumping. (selling a product at a price below cost). Consumers may be pleased to get goods at such a good price, but a firm competing with dumped imports will struggle. The WTO permits anti-dumping policies in order to deter unfair competition.
-Infant industries argument - if protected at the start, industries may be able to grow and reap the benefits of Economies of Scale and compete effectively in the long term without protection.
Arguments against the use tariffs
Reduction in choice for UK consumers plus goods and services are more expensive - a welfare loss for consumers.
-May increase revenues. But likely to cause retaliation from the exporting country ie trade wars. This is likely to mean that everyone is worse off! Whilst the WTO is committed to reduce trade barriers, it allows retaliation in the form of countervailing duties
-May protect UK jobs but likely to be limited if firms do not become competitive on an international scale. This may just delay the inevitable structural change that is necessary. For countries to develop new sources of comparative advantage there is bound to be a transitional period where old industries contract and new industries emerge. Effectively the government is subsidising inefficient local producers.
-Whilst it may give firms time to become more competitive, it may make domestic firms complacent and productivity/ efficiency gains are not realised. This may lead to x-inefficiency and an inability to compete in the global market
-Where the tariff is put on a good and that is price inelastic it will have minimal effect. This may be because domestically produced goods are inferior to the imports. Therefore demand may not increase domestically produced goods.
Quota Surplus
There is a reduction in quantity imported ,a supply extension, and a contraction of demand.
Consumer surplus decreases and producer surplus increases. So domestic producers gain and consumers lose.