Torts - Negligence Flashcards
- Duty on the part of the defendant to conform to a specific standard of care for protection of the plaintiff against unreasonable risk of injury
- Breach of that Duty by Defendant
- The breach is the Actual and Proximate Cause of plaintiff’s injury
- Damages
Prima Facie Case of Negligence
Owed to all foreseeable plaintiffs.
Extent of the duty is determined by the applicable standard of care.
Duty of Care
- Was the plaintiff foreseeable?
2. What is the applicable standard of care?
Negligence Question Guidance
Foreseeable/Unforseeable Plaintiffs
Duty is owed to foreseeable plaintiffs. Problem arises when defendant breaches duty to P1 and causes injury to another (possibly unforeseeable) P2.
P2 can recover only if she can establish that a reasonable person would have foreseen a risk of injury to her under the circumstances.
She was located in the foreseeable zone of danger.
Palsgraf - Majority View - Foreseeable Zone of Danger
CORDOZO
Palsgraf - Minority View - Everyone is Foreseeable
ANDERSON
P2 may establish the existence of a duty extending from defendant to her by a showing that defendant has breached the duty owed to P1.
Specific Situations - Rescuers
Rescuer - foreseeable plaintiff where defendant negligently put himself or a third person in peril. DANGER INVITES RESCUE.
Firefighters and Police Officers - May be barred by the “firefighter rule” from recovering from injuries caused by the risks of rescue.
Specific Situations - Prenatal Injuries
Duty of Care is owed to a viable fetus.
Failure to diagnose a congenital defect or properly perform a contraceptive procedure:
- Child may not recover for “wrongful life”
- Parents may recover damages in “wrongful birth” or
“wrongful pregnancy” action for any additional
medical expenses and for pain and suffering from
labor. Ordinary child rearing expenses CANNOT be
recovered.
Specific Situations - Intended Beneficiaries of Economic Transactions
Third party for whose economic benefit a legal or business transaction was made may be a foreseeable plaintiff.
Example: Beneficiary of a will.
Standards of Care
- Reasonable Person
- Professionals
- Children
- Common Carriers and Innkeepers
- Automobile Driver to Guest
- Bailment Duties (Bailor and Bailee)
- Emergency Situations
- Duty of Possessor to those off premises
- Trespassers
- Attractive Nuisance Doctrine
- Duty owed to Licensee
- Duty owed to Invitee
- Duty owed to users of recreational lands
- Duty of Lessors and Lessees of Realty
- Duty of Vendor of Realty
- Statutory Standard of Care
Reasonable Person Standard
OBJECTIVE STANDARD.
Measured against what the average person would do.
Mental deficiencies and inexperience are not taken into account.
Reasonable person has the same physical characteristics as a defendant.
Person is supposed to know one’s physical handicaps and to exercise care of a person with such knowledge. A BLIND PERSON SHOULD NOT FLY A PLANE.
Standards of Conduct - Professionals
Professional or someone with special occupational skills is required to possess the knowledge and skill of a member of the profession or occupation in good standing in similar communities.
Medical specialist will be held to a national standard of care. APPLIES TO ALL PHYSICIANS.
Duty to Disclose Risks of Treatment - Professionals
Doctor has a duty to disclose the risks of treatment to enable a patient to give informed consent.
BREACHED: If an undisclosed risk was serious enough that a reasonable person in the patient’s position would have withheld consent on learning of the risk.
Standard of Conduct - Children
SUBJECTIVE TEST
Held to the standard of a child of:
- Like Age
- Intelligence
- Education
- Experience
Standard of Conduct - Children Under 4
Child under 4 is usually WITHOUT the capacity to be negligent
Standard of Conduct - Children Engaged in Adult Activities
May be required to conform to an adult standard of care.
Standard of Conduct - Innkeepers and Common Carriers
Held to a very high degree of care. They are liable for slight negligence.
For this to apply - Plaintiff MUST BE a passenger or guest.
Standard of Conduct - Automobile Driver to Guest
Guest in a car is owed a duty of ordinary care.
Some “Guest Statute States” - Only liable to nonpaying passengers for reckless tortious conduct.
Standard of Conduct - Duties Owed by Bailee
Depends on WHO BENEFITS from the Bailment
- Sole benefit of the bailor - low standard of care
- Sole benefit of the bailee - high standard of care
- Mutual benefit (bailment for hire) - Ordinary standard of care
MODERN TREND: Duty of ordinary care under the circumstances - type of bailment is just one factor taken into account.
Standard of Conduct - Duties Owed by Bailor
Sole benefit of bailee bailment - bailor MUST inform the bailee of known, dangerous defects in the chattel
Bailment for Hire - Bailor must inform the bailee of chattel defects of which he is or should be aware
Standard of Conduct - Emergency Situations
Defendant must act as a reasonable person under the same emergency conditions.
EMERGENCY IS NOT CONSIDERED - if it is of defendant’s own making.
Standards of Conduct - Duty of Possessor to Those Off Premises
No duty to protect one off the premises from natural conditions on the premises.
Duty for unreasonably dangerous artificial conditions or structures abutting adjacent land.
One must carry on activities on the premises so as to avoid unreasonable risk of harm to others off the premises.
URBAN Areas - Exam Tip
Owner/occupier is liable for damages caused off the premises by trees on the premises
Standard of Conduct - Duty of Possessor to Those on the Premises - Trespassers
Undiscovered Trespasser - NO DUTY owed
Discovered or Anticipated Trespasser - Landowner must:
- Warn or make safe concealed, unsafe, artificial conditions known to the landowner involving risk of death or serious bodily harm
- Use reasonable care in the exercise of “active operations” on the property
- NO DUTY required for natural conditions or less dangerous artificial conditions