Torts --Miscellaneous Concepts Flashcards

1
Q

Intentional Misrepresentation (Fraud)

A

1) Mispresentation of a material fact;
Not silence, but an affirmative statement

2) Scienter;
D knew or believed statement was false

3) Intent to induce P to act or refrain from acting in reliance upon misrepresentation;

4) causation (actual reliance);

5) Justifiable reliance; and

6) Damages
P must suffer actual pecuniary loss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Negligent Misrepresentation

A

1) Misrepresentation by D in a business or professional capacity;

2) Breach of duty towards P;

3) Causation;

4) Justifiable reliance; and

5) Damages
This is typically limited to actions in a commercial setting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Malicious Prosecution

A

Elements:
Institution of criminal proceedings against plaintiff; (P was the D in that proceeding)

    Termination of proceedings in P’s favor;

    Absence of probable cause for prior proceedings (insufficient facts, no reasonable basis)

     Improper purpose (was not to seek justice)

     Damages  Note: prosecutors are immune from liability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Abuse of Process

A

Elements

1) wrongful use of process for ulterior purpose; and

2) definite act or threat against P in order to accomplish ulterior purpose.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Interference with Business Relations

A

Elements

1) existence of a valid business contractual relationship with P and third party or valid business expectancy held by P;

2) D’s knowledge of the relationship or expectancy;

3) Intentional interference by D inducing breach/termination of relationship or expectancy; and

4) Damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Nuisance

A

Nuisance is not its own tort. It is a type of harm suffered.

There are two kinds of nuisance: public and private.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Private Nuisance

A

Substantial, unreasonable interference with another person’s use or enjoyment of property that she possesses or that she has a right of immediate possession.

Substantial interference: offensive, inconvenient or annoying to an average member in the community.

Unreasonable: balance test—severity of the inflicted injury must outweight utility of D’s conduct.

  Courts consider that people are entitled to use their property in a reasonable way.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Public Nuisance

A

Act that unreasonably interferes with the health, safety, or property rights of the community.

Party may recover for public nuisance only if she suffered unique harm not suffered by community as a whole.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Trespass to Land vs Nuisance

A

Trespass to land- physical invasion occurs

Nuisance-interference with use or enjoyment. Can be intangible interference.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Nuisance Remedies

A

Damages (means monetary award)

Injunction – only if legal remedy (damages) is inadequate or speculative.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Defenses to Nuisance

A

Legislative authority (zoning laws permit activity)

Contributory negligence

Conduct of others (no one actor is liable for actions committed by he and others)

“Coming to the nuisance” – cannot “come to the nuisance” and then initiate legal action if one’s sole purpose for “coming to the nuisance” was to bring lawsuit.
Generally, one may “come to the nuisance” and bring suit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Vicarious Liability

A

Liability that is derivatively imposed.

One person commits a tortious act harming another but we will hold a third person liable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Respondeat Superior

A

Applies to employee/employer (also see master/servant)

Employer will be vicariously liable for tortious acts committed by employee of the act was committed in the scope of employment.
Minor frolics/detours – OK, still hold liable.
Major frolics/detors- NO, don’t hold employer liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Related – Negligent Hiring

A

This is not vicarious liability but is related because it involves employers/employees.

Employers may be held liable for their own neligence by negligently selecting employees (hiring) or supervising employees.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Independent Contractor

A

General Rule: Principal will not be vicariously liable for tortious acts of his agent if the agent is an independent contract.

Two exceptions
1) Independent contractor is engaged in inherently dangerous activity;
2) The duty is non-delegable because of public policy considerations.
Ex: the duty to use due care in building a fence around an excavation site.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Partners and Joint Venturers

A

Each is vicariously liable for the tortious conduct of another if committed in the scope and course of affairs of the joint venture or partnership.

16
Q

Automobile Owner and Driver

A

General rule: Auto owner is not liable for the tortious conduct of the driver of his vehicle.

  Exception: UNLESS person driving is doing it for benefit of auto owner (owner is principal and driver is agent).

  Family car doctrine: liability for immediate household members driving car with express or implied permission

 Permissive use: some states impose liability where driver had owner’s consent.
17
Q

Related – Negligent Entrustment

A

This is not vicarious liability but is related.

An owner may be liable for his own negligence (not the driver’s negligence) in entrusting the car to the driver.

18
Q

Other vicarious liability issues

A

Bailor for bailee of chattel - bailor not liable

Parent/child- general rule, no liability for acts of child.
Liability if child is acting as agent for parent.
Related – parent’s own negligence

Bars
General rule: no liability for patron intoxication
Modern: Dramshop Acts – liability to bar for harm caused to third party injured as a result of intoxicated patron

19
Q

Multiple Defendant Issues

A

Joint and several liability

Satisfaction and release

Contribution and indemnity

20
Q

Loss of Consortium

A

Loss of consortium and services provided by other spouse

21
Q

Residual Concepts in Torts

A

Survival and wrongful death actions

Tort immunities
Intra-family tort immunities

  Governmental tort immunity
       Federal government and FTCA
       State/local governments

  Immunity of public officials

Not heavily tested- review on own, not to be covered here.