torts II deck 16 Public Disclosure of Embarrassing Private Facts ~ False Light ~ Commercial Appropriation of Plaintiff’s Name or Likeness Flashcards
Publicity Given to Private Life– Restatement of the Law (Second) of Torts, p. 1062
One who gives publicity to a matter
Concerning the private life of another
Is subject to liability to the other for
Invasion of his privacy, if the matter publicized is of a kind that
(a) would be highly offensive to a reasonable person, and
(b) is not of legitimate concern to the public.
- Are the facts that are published “a matter of public concern”?
The court expresses “no comment on whether or not the news worthiness of the matter printed will always constitute a complete defense.”
What else does the court consider?
2nd question
Are the facts that are published “so intimate and so unwarranted in view of the victim’s position as to outrage the community’s notions of decency”? What are the “mores of the community”?
answer to the 2 questions
“When focused upon public characters,
truthful comments upon dress, speech, habits, and the ordinary aspects of personality
will usually not transgress this line.”
Does proof of actual malice change the result?
“Personal ill-will is not an ingredient of the offence.”
Warren and Brandeis
“A truthful and therefore non-libelous statement will not become libelous when uttered maliciously.”
is the past the past?
Truthful revelations of past actions
may support a claim for
publication of private embarrassing facts.
The First Amendment
The “First Amendment greatly circumscribes the right
even of a private figure
to obtain damages for the publication of newsworthy facts about him,
even when they are facts of a kind that people want very much to conceal.”
the questions and who decides
When is information too private?
When does the publication of it offend the communities’ sense of decency?
What information is newsworthy enough to overcome privacy?
newsworthy
must still pose a legitamite public purpose
The question
Can a state impose sanctions on the accurate publication of the name of a rape victim obtained from public records?
all about the zone of privacy
the answer is no
Is publication “offensive to the sensibilities” of the “supposed reasonable man”?
It may be, but . . .
When it is in the public record, its publication cannot be offensive
Is there any protection?
The states can decide what becomes public
false light
Is false light the same as defamation?
Restatement (Second) of the Law of Torts, p. 1078-79
One who gives publicity to a matter concerning another that places the other before the public in a false light is subject to liability to the other for invasion of his privacy, if . . .
false light 2 elements
a. The false light in which the other was placed would be
highly offensive to a
reasonable person, and
b. The actor
Had knowledge of or
acted in reckless disregard
as to the falsity of the publicized matter and the false light in which the other would be placed.
how do constitutional protections apply to false light
Requires proof that defendant published reports of matters of public interest with knowledge of its falsity or in reckless disregard of the truth.
false light requires the “Publicity” not “Publication”
“Publicity” requires dissemination to a large number of people