Torts I Flashcards

1
Q

Battery

A

A person is liable for battery if:
1. They intentd to cause a contact with the plaintiff’s person with such contact;
2. Their affirmative conduct causes such contact; and
3. The contact causes harm or is offensive to the plaintiff.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Assault

A
  1. The defendant intends to cause the plaintiff to anticipate an imminent and harmful or offensive contact with the plaintiff’s person; and
  2. The plaintiff was placed in imminent apprehension as a result of the defendant’s conduct.
  3. The defendant’s apparent ability to cause harm can be sufficient to place the plaintiff in anticipation of harm.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

False Imprisonment

A

A defendant is subject to liability to a plaintiff for false imprisonment if:
1. The defendant intends to confine the plaintiff within a limited area;
2. The defendant’s conduct caused the plaintiff’s confinement;
3. The plaintiff is conscious of that confinement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Transfered Intent

A

Exists when a defendant intends to commit an intentional tort against one person but instead commits the tort against a different person. Also exists when a person intends an assault but instead commits a battery.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Does Assault Merge With Battery?

A

No, in torts, assault does not merge with battery. You can be sued for both assault and battery.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

(Battery) 1. They intend to cause a contact with the plaintiff’s person with such contact;

A

The intent required is the intent to make contact. It is not intent to do the act that leads to the contact, nor is it the intent to harm. Knowledge with substantial certainty that a contact will occur is sufficient. CA & some jurisdictions require “dual intent” meaning: (1) intent to make contact and (2) for the purpose of harm or offense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

(Battery) 2. Their affirmative conduct causes such contect; and

A

The conduct must be volitional and it is sufficient to make contact with something closely associated with the plaintiff (i.e. their clothes or a book they are holding).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

(Battery) 3. The contact causes harm or is offensive to the plaintiff.

A

The test is what would be offensive to an ordinary person not unduly sensitive as to personal dignity. Bodily harm is not required.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Assault Requires Apprehension

A

Apprehension means anticipation. Assault does not require one to be in fear.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

False Imprisonment

A

A defendant is subject to liability to a plaintiff for false imprisonment if:
1. The defendant intends to confine the plaintiff within a limited area,
2. The defendant’s conduct caused the plaintiff’s confinement, and
3. The plaintiff is conscious of that confinement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

(False Imprisonment) 2. The defendant’s conduct caused the plaintiff’s confinement,

A

Moral persuasion is insufficient to establish confinement. Confinement can occur as the result of false or improper legal authority. It is sufficient if the defendant fails to release the plaintiff from a confinement despite owing a duty to do so.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

(False Imprisonment) 3. The plaintiff is conscious of that confinement.

A

The test is whether the plaintiff was conscious of the confinement as it was happening. A minority of jurisdictions allow recovery if the plaintiff was conscious of the confinement or was harmed by it. If there is a reasonable means of escape, there is no confinement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress

A

A defendant will be liable for IIED if they:
1. Intend to cause extreme and severe emotional distress upon the plaintiff, or knew with substantial certainty that the plaintiff would suffer severe emotional distress,
2. With conduct that is severe and outrageous, and
3. The plaintiff suffered severe and extreme emotional distress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

(IIED) 1. Intend to cause extreme and severe emotional distress upon the plaintiff, or knew with substantial certainty that the plaintiff would suffer severe emotional distress.

A

It is not the intent to do the act that leads to severe emotional distress. It is intent to cause severe emotional distress upon the plaintiff with the act. Some jurisdictions (CA included) require that the conduct be directed at the plaintiff with the plaintiff present (minority view).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

(IIED) 2. With conduct that is extreme and outrageous, and

A

Conduct is extreme if it exceeds all possible limits of decency in a civilized society and is especially calculated to inflict severe and emotional distress. Mere insults and vulgarities will not suffice. The context and manner in which the conduct is directed at the plaintiff is to be considered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

(IIED) 3. The plaintiff severe and extreme emotional distress.

A

The emotional distress must be beyond what a reasonable person could endure.

17
Q

Trespass to Land

A

A defendant is liable for trespass to land if:
1. The defendant commits an intentional act,
2. That causes the physical invasion onto the land of another.

18
Q

(Trespass to Land) 1. The defendant commits an intentional act,

A

The defendant does not have to intend harm to the land. The defendant only needs to intend to do the act that leads to the physical invasion into the land of another.

19
Q

(Trespass to Land) 2. That causes the physical invasion onto the land of another.

A

Harm is not required (breaking a blade of grass will suffice). Physical invasion can be airspace above or subsurface below. The physical invasion can occur when someone fails to remove something from the property after consent or privilege to be on the property has been withdrawn.

20
Q

Trespass to Chattels

A

A defendant will be liable for trespass to chattels if:
1. They intend an act that interferes with another’s property, and
2. The act interferes with the plaintiff’s right of possession in the property.

21
Q

(Trespass to Chattels) 1. They intend an act that interferes with another’s property, and

A

Only intent to do the act is necessary. The defendant need not intend to interfere.

22
Q

(Trespass to Chattels) 2. The act interferes with the plaintiff’s right of possession in the property.

A

Dispossession is sufficient. Impairment as to the property’s condition, quality, or value is sufficient. Deprivation of use for a substantial period of time is sufficient. Bodily harm is caused to he possessor, or harm is caused to some person or thing in which the possessor has a legally protected interest is sufficient.