Torts Flashcards
What is an act?
Volitional movement by defendant.
Define intent?
Either
specific-the goal in acting is to bring about specific consequences
General-the actor knows with substantial certainty that these consequences will result.
What is the general rule of transferred intent?
The transferred intent doctrine applies when the defendant intends to commit a tort against a person but:
- Commits a different tort against that person
- Commits the same tort against a different person
- Commits a different tort against a different person
What are the only torts that involve transferred intent?
Both the tort intended and the one committed must be:
- Assault
- Battery
- False imprisonment
- Trespass to land
- Trespass to chattels
Is everyone capable of intent?
Everyone is capable of intent. Young children, or mentally incompetent will be liable for intentional torts.
What is causation?
The result must have been legally caused by defendants act. Or something set in motion by him. Causation is satisfied if a conduct was a SUBSTANTIAL FACTOR in bringing about the injury.
What are the elements of intentional torts?
It must be an
- Act
- Intentional-specific or general
- There must be causation.
What are the elements of battery?
- Harmful or offensive contact
- to a plaintiffs person
3 must have intent and causation
How is harmful or offensive contact judged?
Harmful and offensiveness are judged by a reasonable person standard.
When is a contact considered offensive?
Contact is considered offensive only if it has not been consented to however consent will be implied for ordinary contacts of everyday life.
What is a direct or indirect contact
Contact can be direct (as in striking) or indirect (as in setting a trap for plaintiffs to fall into)
What is a plaintiffs person?
A plaintiffs person includes anything connected to the plaintiff example clothing or a purse.
What are the elements of assault?
- An act
- by defendant
- creating a reasonable apprehension in plaintiff of immediate harmful or offensive contact to plaintiff’s person.
Is apprehension fear?
No apprehension is not fear.
Is an apparent ability sufficient to cause apprehension?
Yes if defendant has the apparent ability to commit a battery this will be enough to cause a reasonable apprehension.
Are words alone sufficient to create liability For assault?
No words alone are not sufficient for defendant to be liable the words must be coupled with conduct.
Explain the requirement of immediacy (assault) ?
Plaintiff must be apprehensive that she or he is about to become the victim of an immediate battery