Torts Flashcards

1
Q

INTERFERNCE

A

What is the alleged interference? State as a Question… will interference satisfy an action in tort.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

PARTIES

A

Names of the parties involved.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

TIME LIMITATIONS: TRESPASS

A

Action must be brought within six years s10(1)(a) Limitation of Actions Act 1974 (Qld)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

JURISDICTION

A

QLD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

ONUS OF PROOF: TRESPASS

A

Non-highway: Plaintiff to prove on balance of probabilities, direct interference took place, Defendant to disprove fault. McHale v Watson
Highway: Plaintiff throughout. Lord v Nominal Defendant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

ONUS: NEGLIGENCE

A

On plaintiff throughout Donoghue v Stevenson
Specifically on plaintiff for damages s12 Civil Liability Act 2003 (Qld)
Moves to defendant for defences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

TIME LIMITATIONS: NEGLIGENCE

A

Pure Psychiatric Loss:
• 3 years from time in which date of cause of action arose s11(1) Limitation of Actions Act 1974 (Qld)
Pure Economic Loss:
• 6 years from time in which date of cause of action arose s10(1)(a) Limitation of Actions Act 1974 (Qld)
Novel:
• 6 years from time in which date of cause of action arose for property damage s10(1)(a) Limitation of Actions Act 1974 (Qld)
• 3 years if duty concerns personal injury s11(1) LOAA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

TIME LIMITATIONS: PRIVATE NUISANCE

A
  • Three years if damage relates to personal injures s11 Limitation of Actions Act 1974 (Qld)
  • Six years if damage relates to personal property. s10(a) Limitation of Actions Act 1974 (Qld) → is it s10(1)(a)??
  • If nuisance is continuing, plaintiff can commence action at any time during the continuance and recover for all damage up to that time. Earl of Harrington v Derby Corporation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

ONUS: PRIVATE NUISANCE

A

Plaintiff to prove they have title and interference, defendant to demonstrate reasonableness and any defences. Kraemers v Attorney General

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly