Torts Flashcards
INTERFERNCE
What is the alleged interference? State as a Question… will interference satisfy an action in tort.
PARTIES
Names of the parties involved.
TIME LIMITATIONS: TRESPASS
Action must be brought within six years s10(1)(a) Limitation of Actions Act 1974 (Qld)
JURISDICTION
QLD
ONUS OF PROOF: TRESPASS
Non-highway: Plaintiff to prove on balance of probabilities, direct interference took place, Defendant to disprove fault. McHale v Watson
Highway: Plaintiff throughout. Lord v Nominal Defendant
ONUS: NEGLIGENCE
On plaintiff throughout Donoghue v Stevenson
Specifically on plaintiff for damages s12 Civil Liability Act 2003 (Qld)
Moves to defendant for defences
TIME LIMITATIONS: NEGLIGENCE
Pure Psychiatric Loss:
• 3 years from time in which date of cause of action arose s11(1) Limitation of Actions Act 1974 (Qld)
Pure Economic Loss:
• 6 years from time in which date of cause of action arose s10(1)(a) Limitation of Actions Act 1974 (Qld)
Novel:
• 6 years from time in which date of cause of action arose for property damage s10(1)(a) Limitation of Actions Act 1974 (Qld)
• 3 years if duty concerns personal injury s11(1) LOAA
TIME LIMITATIONS: PRIVATE NUISANCE
- Three years if damage relates to personal injures s11 Limitation of Actions Act 1974 (Qld)
- Six years if damage relates to personal property. s10(a) Limitation of Actions Act 1974 (Qld) → is it s10(1)(a)??
- If nuisance is continuing, plaintiff can commence action at any time during the continuance and recover for all damage up to that time. Earl of Harrington v Derby Corporation
ONUS: PRIVATE NUISANCE
Plaintiff to prove they have title and interference, defendant to demonstrate reasonableness and any defences. Kraemers v Attorney General