Torts Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

TIP: Look to the call of the question. Does the question give you the call, or are there options?

A

Look to all the facts! Don’t just look at the first and last line.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define Battery?

A

Act
Intending to cause a harmful or offensive contact with the person of another; and
An offensive or harmful contact directly or indirectly results.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

3 types of battery?

A

1) Intends to commit an offensive contact, and an offensive or harmful contact occurs.
2) D intends to commit an assault and a harmful contact occurs.
3) D commits an act, which he knows creates a SUBSTANTIAL CERTAINTY that a harmful or offensive contact will occur (think swinging knumb chucks in an elevator).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define the defense of consent?

A

1) If the victim gives permission, what would otherwise be tortious is instead privileged.
2) An individual can convey consent expressly in WORDS or through NON VERBAL gestures.
3) An individual can imply consent when, under the circumstances, the conduct of hte individual reasonably conveys consent.
4) Consent can also be implied by law. (Medical emergency when a victim is unconscious and unable to give consent).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Consent in a physical sport is what?

A

Taking part in a game manifests a willingness to submit to such bodily contact that are permitted by its rules or usages. If beyond the rules, NO COSNET.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

REMEMBER: Battery requires INTENT to make contact.

A

Accidentally falling into someone is not INTENT.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

TESTING TIP: Must meet ALL elements first. If an element is missing, then you don’t need defenses.

A

Must prove all elements first, and then look to defenses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define Assault

A

An act by the D that creates a REASONABLE apprehension in the P of immediate harmful or offensive contact.

** Requires intent on the part of the D to bring about apprehension of immediate harmful or offensive contact in the P.

** Causation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What constitutes “contact” for assault and battery?

A

Protection against unpermitted contacts extends to ANY part of the body, or to anything which is ATTACHED to it and practically identified with it.

(Contact with the P’s clothing, cane, paper or any object held in the hand, a chair or horse on which he is sitting, or a car in which he is riding or driving)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

BATTERY AND ASSAULT REQUIRE

A

INTENT!!!!!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Define IIED?

A

1) Extreme and outrageous conduct;
2) Intent by D that P suffer severe emotional distress, or recklessness;
3) Causation; and
4) Damages - SEVERE emotional distress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

In order for a 3rd party to recover for IIED or NIED, what two elements are required?

A

1) the 3rd party must be a CLOSE family member of the person to whom the defendant is directing his (extreme and outrageous) conduct; AND
2) the D should be aware of the presence of the third person.

*** If the 3rd person is not a close family member, then he must suffer BODILY HARM in order to prevail **

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define the defense of PRIVATE necessity?

A

Private necessity will excuse tortious conduct aimed at property.

However, When the act is for the benefit of the actor of a third person, he is subject to liability for any harm caused by the exercise of the privilege.”

Remember: both property and personal injury damages are awarded here.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define conversion?

A

The actor only needs an intent to take, REGARDLESS of her intent to take (mistakenly taking the property of another.)

** An actor is NOT relieved of liability to another for conversion by his belief, because of a mistake of law or fact not induced by the other, that he has possession of the chattel.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is required for trespass to land?

A

INTENT!

If you do not intend to be there you are not responsible UNLESS there is damage caused to the land.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define false imprisonment?

A

1) an act by defendant that confines or constrains plaintiff;
2) to a bounded area;
3) defendant intends to confine; and
4) causation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the shopkeeper’s privilege?

A

A businessman who reasonably suspects a customer of theft or of failure to pay may detain the suspected individual for a short time in order to investigate.

THe privilege is, however, a very restricted one, confined to what is reasonably necessary for its limited purpose of enabling the defendant to do what is possible on the SPOT to discover the facts.

** Reasonable is the key here ***

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is duty?

A

What? A legal requirement to act as an ordinary, prudent, reasonably person taking precaution against unreasonable risks of injury to others.

To Whom? All foreseeable plaintiffs.

When? Everyday situations. Emergency situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What are the duties of care to:
Trespasser?
Licensee?
Invitee?

A

Trespasser: Unkown - no duty

Licensee: we “like” - friend: warn of known dangers

Invitee: customer - 1) Inspect; and 2) Make Safe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Define Negligence Per Se?

A

Statute designed to:

  • The P. must be a member of the class of persons intended to be protected by the statute (Prevent this type of injury); and
  • The harm suffered must be of a type that the statute was designed to protect against (Protect this class of plaintiff).

(Usually applies when there is a statute given in the question).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Define Res Ipsa Loquitur.

A

1) THe accident does not normally occur absent negligence on the part of the defendant; AND
2) The instrumentality causing the accident was within the defendant’s EXCLUSIVE control.
OR

1) in the absence of negligence, the accident would not have occurred;
2) other causes are eliminated by the evidence; and
3) the thing hat cause the injury is shown to have been under the exclusive control of the alleged wrongdoer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Always assume what type of liability unless told otherwise?

A

Joint and several liability, with pure comparative negligence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Define concurrent causation (joint tortfeasorts).

A

Where the combined negligence acts of two or more tortfeasors cause an indivisible injury (incapable of appointment) each tortfeasor is held jointly and severally liable.

Remember: in most cases, the court places the burden of proof on the issue of causation upon the two DEFENDANTS, not the Plaintiff, UNLESS the Defendant can prove that he is not culpable, liability will be imposed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Define Release.

A
  • When a tortfeasor makes a pretrial agreement to pay her share of the damages awarded to plaintiff, such settlements usually preclude the court’s determination of each tortfeasor’s relative liability.
  • THe settling defendant’s percentage of fault is deducted from the damages awarded to the plaintiff regardless of actual payment made by the settling defendant.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Remember: A shopkeeper is generally not liable for the intentional tortious acts of third persons.

A

.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What are Unforseeable/Superseding Causes?

A

1) Acts of God (lightening, floods);
2) Intentional torts of third parties;
3) Intentional crimes of third parties.

If unforeseeable - Defendant not liable (superseding)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What are examples of foreseeable intervening causes?

A

1) subsequent medical malpractice;
2) negligence of rescuers;
3) subsequent disease;
4) subsequent accident.

Where the defendant suffers a subsequent injury following her original injury, and the original injury was a substantial factor in causing the second accident, the original tortfeasor is usually held liable for damages arising from the second accident.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Abnormally dangerous activities are?

A

1) A category of activity subject to strict liability.
2) If the activity creates a risk of serious injury to the land or chattels of the P or to the P himself and this risk cannot be eliminated through the exercise of due care, and that particular activity is not generally performed in that particular physical area.

Examples - stores of explosives, fumigation, crop dusting, the storage of flammable liquids, pile driving, and maintenance of a hazardous waste site.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Wild animals?

A

An owner of a wild animal is strictly liable to persons who are injured by the animal.

Examples - lions, tigers, bears, elephants, wolves, monkeys, and sharks, snakes, spider.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Strict Product Liability

A

One who sells a product in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user or consumer is held STRICTLY LIABLE for the harm or injury that is caused.

DEFECTIVE and DANGEROUS are the words that trigger strict liability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Products Liability Defendants when dealing with strict products liability.

A
  • One who sells a product in a defective condition unreasonable dangerous to the user or consumer.

Defendant must be a commercial seller of such products. A SELLER IN THE ORDINARY CONDITION.

Be careful not to confuse with NEGLIGENCE. Need only prove in the business of selling.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Define Misrepresentation.

A

1) False Statement
2) Scienter (guilty knowledge)
3) Intent to induce the plaintiff to act
4) Justifiable reliance
5) Damages

My Fat Mother is Jewish.

** Honest belief is a valid defense **

33
Q

Define Private Nuisance

A

A disturbance that creates a SUBSTANTIAL and UNREASONABLE interference with the use and enjoyment of ones property.

The disturbance must be annoying, offensive, or inconvenient to NORMAL person in the particular locality.

Don’t get trapped by the “hypersensitive” plaintiff.

34
Q

Defamation

A

Defamatory - statement of fact, NOT OPINION

Publication - to any 3rd party who reasonably understands (this is important - think foreign language person doesn’t understand).

Damages -General damages presumed, special damages required (except liable & slander per se)

P’s Standard of Proof - Fault & Falsity: public official, public figure - malice

Private person

1) matter of public concern (published in newspaper) - negligence
2) matter of private concern (letter to another person)- publication only.

*** ONLY STATEMENTS OF FACT ARE ACTIONABLE FOR DEFAMATION **

35
Q

Define Slander Per Se.

A

Defamatory statement imputes:

  • Loathsome diseases
  • Unchastity to a woman
  • Improper conduct in one’s trade, business or profession (the BIG one).
  • False accusation of a crime.

In all of these, SPECIAL damages are PRESUMED!

36
Q

Invasion of Right to Privacy

A

4 subcategories to this Tort:

1) Appropriation
2) False light
3) Intrusion upon seclusion
4) Public disclosure of private facts.

37
Q

Define False Light.

A

.

38
Q

Define Public Disclosure of Private Facts.

A

.

39
Q

Define Intrusion on One’s Seclusion and Solitude.

A

.

40
Q

Define Battery

A

1) Intent
2) Harmful or Offensive Contact
3) With Plaintiff or something closely connected to Plaintiff.

41
Q

What is sufficient intent for batter?

A

1) desired contact (just touching) even if motive was pure (the purpose need only to be contact);
2) knew or substantially certain to result.

42
Q

What is harmful in battery?

A

Any amount of physical comfort is enough.

43
Q

What is offensive in battery?

A

offensive to reasonable person unless the Defendant knows of the person’s susceptibility.

44
Q

What else can constitute battery?

A

Touching someone’s glasses, purse, etc….

45
Q

Define Assault

A

1) Apprehension
2) Intent
3) Harmful or Offensive
4) Bodily contact

46
Q

What is enough apprehension for assault?

A

1) the purpose to create apprehension; or
2) knew apprehension would result.

  • ** The plaintiff has to be aware it’s about to occur ***
    • Must be reasonable unless knows of particular susceptibility **
47
Q

REMEMBER: Assault and Battery DO NOT MERGE.

A

.

48
Q

What is imminence?

A

Almost immediate (no real delay of time).

49
Q

Define False Inprisionment

A

1) Intent
2) Confinement
3) Against P’s will; and
4) P knows of confinement or is injured thereby.

50
Q

What constitutes confinement for F/I?

A

Actually must be confinement of the P in a BOUNDED area. The legnth of confinement DOES NOT MATTER!!

51
Q

REMEMBER: If the P knows of a reasonable means of escape, there is no confinement.

A

.

52
Q

HINT: Whenever you use the word reasonable, you should talk about it in an ESSAY.

A

.

53
Q

What is enough for “against the P’s will?”

A

If they consent to confinement, it’s not enough. (i.e. come with me - we are going to call the police, when she came with them it’s consent).

54
Q

Define IIED

A

1) Intent/Reckless
2) Extreme or outrageous conduct
3) Causation
4) Sever emotional distress.

55
Q

What is the mental state for IIED

A

In addition to intent, defendant can show reckless conduct. (Calling someone to say their child has been rushed to the ER when they haven’t).

56
Q

REMEMBER: NO transferred intent for IIED.

A

HOWEVER, 3rd parties can recover if they can show recklessness (example - conduct done in front of someone where the actor KNOWS the third person is there).

57
Q

What constitutes EXTREME and OUTRAGEOUS?

A

Excedes conduct tolerated by all civilized society. This is a high bar!

58
Q

Exceptions where lesser conduct will be enough for IIED:

A

1) Inn keeper or common carrier;
2) The D knows of the P’s susceptibility; and
3) Someone in a position of authority uses racial or ethnic insults.

59
Q

What is severe emotional distress?

A

Not injury! The P must put on PROOF that the injury is not trivial.

60
Q

Define trespass to land.

A

1) Intent
2) Entry
3) P’s land.

61
Q

What is intent for trespass to land?

A

This is not intuitive. The P has to show the D desired to enter,or that entry is virtually certain to result. (Mistake doesn’t matter - not trespass, intent to ENTER).

62
Q

What constitutes entry for trespass to land?

A

Anything - even a pesticide to land. (smells = nuisance).

63
Q

Who can bring an action in trespass to land?

A

Anyone in POSSESSION of the land - landowner, tenant, adverse possessor.

64
Q

What are the categories of tort remedies?

A

1) Legal Damages
2) Restitutionary remedies
3) Equitable remedies (injunction)

65
Q

Special things for T2L:

A

1) nominal damages are recoverable -
2) ejectment - an action brought by a P to recover possession of REAL property;
3)

66
Q

Define trespass to chattels

A

1) interference or meddling
2) intent
3) P’s property (chattel)
4) harm

67
Q

What is intent in trespass to chattel?

A

Even reasonable mistake doesn’t relieve liability.

68
Q

What type of harm is required for trespass to chattels?

A

It has to be measurable.

69
Q

Checklist for Torts question?

A

1) Who is the Plaintiff
2) Who is the Defendant/responsible parties?
3) What is the nature of the plaintiff’s injury?
4) What legal theory or theories can the Plaintiff pursue? (Negligence is always the default)

70
Q

When is there a duty to warn?

A

Usually there isn’t unless an exception applies.

Exceptions - Special Relationship
1)

71
Q

What is negligent entrustment?

A

Where the D gives something to someone and the D should know the person is not capable of handling it.

72
Q

Is there a duty to protect from 3rd party criminal acts?

A
Usually no, unless special relationship
1) LL/T
2) Business/ Patron
PLUS
A high level of forseeability in order to find there is a duty. (Usually a prior similar  instance)
73
Q

What are the elements of negligent infliction of emotional distress?

A

1) P is within the “zone of danger.”

2) P suffers some PHYSICAL MANIFESTATION of the emotional distress.

74
Q

What are the elements for bystander recovery for NIED?

A

1) 3rd party is a CLOSE personal relative; and
2) 3rd party is present and suffers emotional distress due to wittiness event.

** Only under IIED does the D need to KNOW the 3rd party is there. **

75
Q

What is the liability for a land possessor?

A

1) Activities - the injury to plaintiff derived from the conduct of persons on the land.
2) Artificial conditions - injury derived from circumstances created by persons on the land (buildings, excavations, cultivation).
3) Natural conditions - injury derived from natural conditions.

76
Q

What is the duty to a trespasser, licensee and invitee?

A

1) Trespasser - unknown, no duty.
2) Licensee - friend, warn of KNOWN dangers (on land with consent but not held open to public or potential economic benefit)
3) Invitee - customer, inspect and make safe (open to public and potential economic benefit).

77
Q

Define Alternative Liability Doctrine (Joint Tortfeasors)

A

The jury may infer negligence if it finds 2 individuals liable when each is liable and EITHER individual could have caused the plaintiff’s injuries.

78
Q

Define Joint Enterprise Doctrine

A

A jury can find negligence on 1 defendant when 2 or more people embark on a project with a common purpose resulting in negligence. (1 must be a commercial seller for strict liability to apply).