Torts Flashcards
Three (3) Types Of Essays
1-Negligence;
2-Product Liability; and
3-Defamation
Elements of Negligence?
Duty
Breach
Causation🡪Two Causes
-Actual
-Proximate
(foreseeability)
Intervening vs Superseding Causes
Damages🡪Actual physical harm
What are the defenses for Negligence?
Modified Comparative Negligence→50% or less at fault
**If ℿ is more than
50% at fault
complete bar to
recovery*
*Does NOT apply to “med-mal” case, ℿ
pure comparative still
applies ℿ damages
reduced by % of fault
as determined by
fact-finder
Assumption of risk
-ℿ knew/appreciated the nature of the risk and proceeded anyway🡪can’t sue
Negligence Per Se
Violation of an ordinance or statute
-Part of the protected class that the law was designed to protect
Injury is the kind that the law was trying to prevent (school zone)
Negligence-Other Issues
*Vicarious liability
*Negligence Per Se
*Good Samaritan Rule
*Vicarious Liability
*Negligent hiring
*Joint & Several Liability
*Sovereign Immunity
*Medical Malpractice
*Punitive Damages
*Collateral Source Rule
Product Liability- Causes of Action
- Negligence
- Breach of Warranty
- Express-merchantability
- Implied-fitness for
particular use
- Strict Product Liability (elements)
- Inadequate/Failure to Warn**
Strict Product Liability
Elements
1. Product left manufacturer in defective condition (design or manufacturing)
2. Sold by commercial seller
3. Foreseeable user
4. Used in manner intended- unchanged
Product Liability Defenses
1-Assumption of the risk
2-Intentional misrepresentation – to induce reliance of a material fact
3-Negligent misrepresentation – generally during a business transaction
Strict Product Liability
1 - Product left
manufacturer in
defective condition
(design/manufactured)
2 - Sold by commercial seller
3 - Foreseeable user
4 - Used in manner intended🡪unchanged
Defamation-Elements
False statement of fact
About ℿ which
Hurts their reputation with
Publication △ is at fault and causes
Damages
If it’s a media defendant & ℿ gives notice 5 days before suit requesting retraction and broadcast was in good faith, only actual damages recovereable
- Private person standard of proof 🡪negligent disregard for truth
- Public figure standard of proof
🡪actual malice (knew or should have known) reckless disregard for truth
Slander
Must prove special damages🡪pecuniary loss
Slander Per Se
Statements so bad that damages are presumed:
* -Chastity of women
* -Accused of a loathsome disease
* -Accused of a felony
Libel
- Written in permanent form of defemation
- Special harm not required
Defense
- Truth
- Qualified privilege-made in proper manner in good faith