TORTS Flashcards
What is required for a prima facie case for intentional tort liability?
(Burden of proof => Plaintiff)
1) D’s intent
- Specific (D’s purpose is to bring about these consequences)
- General (D knows with substantial certainty that the consequences will result)
- NO need to intend for injury to occur (as long as D’s intent caused harmful result)
2) Causation
- D’s conduct is ‘substantial factor’ in resulting injury (almost always is)
3) D’s act
- Volitional movement on D’s part (D’s will)
What is the rule for transferred intent?
Allows:
1) Intent as to one tort to qualify as intent for another tort, and;
2) Intent as to one person to qualify as intent as to another person; applies to:
- Battery
- Assault
- False imprisonment
- Trespass to land
- Trespass to chattel
What is required for battery?
1) Intentionally causing
- Direct
- Indirect (D’s act sets in motion a force that brings about harmful/offensive contact)
2) a harmful or offensive
Harmful (actual injury/disfigurement)
- Offensive (NO consent implied from reasonable person based on P’s conduct/circumstances, e.g. saving pedestrian from car accident, whether safe to do so)
- Offensive (embarassment)
- NO P’s awareness required
3) bodily contact with another person
- P’s body
- Anything connected to P’s body
- Create situation likely to harm P
- NOT animals
What is the difference between intentional torts to person and negligence in terms of damages?
Intentional torts to person:
- NO damages required (UNLESS IIED)
- Nominal damages recoverable (UNLESS IIED)
- Punitive damages recoverable (D’s malice)
Negligence:
- Damages required
- NO nominal damages recoverable
- NO punitive damages recoverable
What is the difference between intentional torts to the person and IIED?
Battery/Assault/False imprisonment
- Intent required
- Nominal damages
- Punitive damages
IIED
- Intent/Recklessness required
- Actual damages (for severe emotional distress)
What is required for assault?
1) Intentionally placing a person in
2) reasonable apprehension of an
- NOT exaggerated fears of contact
- Knowledge of assault required (unlike battery)
- NO knowledge of D’s identity required
- D’s apparent ability to commit battery
- Words + Overt act (otherwise words alone can negate assault)
3) imminent
- NOT unloaded gun + awareness of unloaded gun
4) harmful or offensive contact
What is required for false imprisonment?
1) An intentional
2) act of restraint on another person causing that person’s
- D’s physical barriers
- D’s physical force vs P/P’s family/P’s property
- D’s direct/indirect (reasonable) threat of force vs P/P’s family/P’s property
- D’s failure to release P when under legal affirmative duty to do so
- D’s invalid use of legal authority (false arrest)
- NOT moral pressure
3) confinement within bounded area
- P’s freedom of movement is limited in ALL directions
- NO reasonable means of escape + Known to P or harmed by confinement
- OTHERWISE shoplifer’s privilege allowed
Does the length of time of false imprisonment matter?
No
Must Plaintiff resist physical force used in false imprisonment?
No
What is required for intentional infliction of emotional distress?
1) Extreme + Outrageous conduct that
- Transcends all bounds of decency tolerated by society
- NO physical injury
2) intentionally or recklessly causes a person to suffer
3) severe emotional distress
‘Severe’ emotional distress (More outrageous; Less damages required)
- NO physical injury or medical diagnosis required
4) causation
- Actual: Plaintiff
- Proximate: Bystander case
What are examples of extreme and outrageous conduct?
Extreme business conduct
- Continuous methods of bill collection
Misuse of authority
- School threats/bullying
Offensive/Insulting language
- P has special relationship with D
- D knows of P’s sensitivity
Common carrier/inkeeper’s conduct vs P (patron)
Known sensitivites
- Children
- Pregnant women
- Elderly people
What is required for Bystander IIED?
Plaintiff-Bystander must show the D intentionally or recklessly caused severe emotional distress to:
1) A member of the victim’s family who is present at the time, even if such distress does not result in bodily harm; or
2) To any other person who is present at the time, if such distress results in bodily harm
What is the difference between negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress?
NIED
- Was in the zone of danger (risk of physical harm) and suffered physical symptoms of distress
- Observed a close relative suffering physical harm
- D damaged the dead body of the plaintiff’s close relative; or
- D misinformed the plaintiff that a relative died or was seriously injured
IIED
- D’s knowledge of P’s presence + close relation
- Severe emotional distress
- Extreme + Outrageous conduct
What is required for trespass to land?
1) Intentionally entering or remaining on (or causing another person or object to enter or remain on)
- Knowledge with substantial certainty of objects entering the land (NOT intent to trespass)
- D’s mental state NOT relevant
2) another’s person’s real property
3) without permission (damage to land is not required and includes the space above/below the ground)
What is the difference between the intentional torts to property?
Trespass to land
- NO damage required
Trespass to chattel/Conversion
- Damage required
What is the difference between intentional and negligent trespass over property in terms of damage?
Intentional trespass
- NO damage required
Negligent trespass
- Damage required
What is required for trespass to chattel?
1) An act that
2) intentionally
- Cause interference (NOT trespass)
- D’s mistake of chattel NOT relevant
3) interferes with (less serious than conversion)
- Intermeddling (direct damage)
- Dispossession (deprive P’s right)
4) another’s personal property (interference must cause dispossession of, cause harm to, or reduce the value of the chattel)
What remedies are available for trespass to chattel?
Direct damage/Loss of use
- Actual damages
Dispossession
- Damages (rental value)
What is required for conversion?
1) An act causing
- Cause interference (NOT trespass)
- Includes BFP
- D’s mistake of chattel NOT relevant
2) serious and substantial interference with or destruction of
- Wrongful acquisition (theft/embezzlement)
- Wrongful transfer (sale/misdelivery)
- Wrongful detention (refuse to return)
- Substantial change
- Severe damage/destruction
- Misuse of chattel
3) another’s personal property (substantial interference justifies the defendant pay the full value of the personal property)
What remedies are available for conversion?
Damages
- Fair market value (at time of conversion)
Replevin
- Return of chattel
What is the difference between trespass to chattel and conversion?
Trespass to chattel
- Less serious interference (damages < 50% of fair market value)
- Remedies: Actual damages/Rental value for dispossession
Conversion
- More serious interference (damages > 50% of fair market value)
- Remedies: Replevin/Fair market value at time of conversion
What is required for consent?
1) Valid consent (capacity)
- Express (NO known mistake by D/NO fraudulent inducement NOT re collateral matter/NO immediate duress)
- Implied (Apparent consent that reasonable person would infer from P’s conduct or custom/Consent implied by law like emergencies)
2) Not exceed scope of consent
- Not to do something substantially different
3) NOT criminal act
- Consent NOT applicable to crimes (majority view)
What is required for self-defense?
1) D reasonably believes/mistaken that he will be attacked
- UNLESS duty to retreat ‘safely’ (NOT from D’s own dwelling)
- UNLESS D is initial aggressor (NOT D using non-deadly force then P using deadly force)
- UNLESS injures TP bystander ‘intentionally’ (liable to TP)
2) D may use force as ‘reasonably necessary’ as it appears to prevent harm
- If serious injury likely => Can commit death/serious bodily injury
3) To prevent commission of tort
- NOT already committed tort (NO retaliation allowed)
What is required for defense of others?
1) D reasonably believes/mistaken that aided person had right to self-defense
- Even if aided person was initial aggressor
2) D may use ‘as much force’ as he could have in self-defense
What is required for defense of property?
Request P to desist/leave first
- NOT clearly futile/dangerous to D
Use force vs P
1) Clearly futile/dangerous to D
2) Either;
- Reasonable force
- Deadly force (if invasion of property involves serious threat of bodily harm)
3) To prevent tort commission (NOT already committed)
4) D’s real/personal property
5) ) Reasonable mistake as to;
- Intrusion
- Request to desist/leave
- Privilege (right of re-entry/necessity) > Supersedes defense of property
What is required for re-entry onto land?
Ejectment (modern view) => Recover possession of land
- NOT self-help (common law) => Rejected
What is required for recapture of chattels?
1) ‘Timely’ deemed
- UNLESS clearly futile/dangerous
2) Recovery from wrongdoer
- Tortfeasor
- TP with knowledge of tort
- NOT innocent party
3) Entry on land to remove chattel
- Wrongdoer’s land
- Innocent party’s land ((1) Refuses to return; (2) Reasonable time; and (3) Peaceful manner)
4) Reasonable force to recapture chattels
- NOT cause death/serious bodily harm
What is required for shoplifting detention/privilege to detain shoplifters?
1) Reasonable belief as to theft
2) Reasonable manner
- Non-deadly force
3) Reasonable period of time
4) Investigative purposes
- OTHERWISE false imprisonment
What is required for privilege of arrest?
Felony arrest (by police)
1) Felony committed (reasonable belief)
2) Arrestee committed felony (reasonable belief)
3) Reasonably necessary force/Deadly force (potential serious harm)
Felony arrest (by citizen)
1) Felony committed (NO reasonable belief)
2) Arrestee committed felony (reasonable belief)
3) Reasonably necessary force/Deadly force (potential serious harm)
Misdemeanor arrest (by police/citizen)
1) Breach of the peace
2) Misdemeanor takes place in presence of D
3) Reasonable necessary force (NO deadly force)
What is required for necessity?
1) Trespass/Conversion
2) Reasonably + apparently necessary to avoid threatened injury from ‘natural’ force
3) Threatened injury is substantially more serious than necessity
4) Either;
- Public necessity (Protect public good)
- Private necessity (Protect limited number of people)
What is required for discipline?
1) Reasonable force
2) By Parent/Teacher
3) On Children
- Age + sex
- Seriousness of their behaviour
What is the difference between private nuisance and trespass to land?
Private nuisance
- Possession (Tenant)
Trespass to land
- Ownership (Landlord)
Can landowner use force if trespasser enters land by necessity?
NO
- Trespasser’s privilege (Necessity) > Landowner’s defense of property
When may defendant be liable for damages caused by necessity?
Qualified privilege (liability) - Protecting D (himself)
NOT absolute privilege (NO liability)
- Protecting P (landowner)
Are children/mentally incompetent persons liable for intentional torts?
Yes
- Knowledge of harmful result required
What is the duty of care?
Defendant has legal duty to act as ordinary, prudent, reasonable person would when engaging in an activity
- Take precautions against creating unreasonable risks of injury
- To foreseeable persons
What is required for Defendant to be liable for injuries to rescuers?
1) D negligently placed P/TP in peril
2) P was injured in attempting a rescue
- NOT reckless rescue
=> P is foreseeable plaintiff
Does Defendant owe duty to police officers/firefighters?
Unlikely (Firefighters’ rule)
- Public policy
- Assumption of risk
What is required for Defendant to be liable for wrongful birth?
1) Viable fetus (at time of injury)
2) Parent sues for;
- Wrongful birth (failure to diagnose defect)
- Wrongful pregnancy (failure to properly perform contraceptive procedure)
=> Parent can recover damages for;
- Unwanted labour (medical expenses, pain and suffering)
- Child’s defect (additional medical expenses, emotional distress)
- NOT health child (NOT child-rearing expenses)
What is the applicable basic standard of care?
D’s conduct is measured against the reasonable, ordinary, prudent person (objective standard) (Reasonable Prudent Person standard)
- Same physical characteristics
- Same knowledge/experience as average member of community (or must exercise with superior knowledge as superior person would)
What is required for professionals to exercise particular standard of care?
1) Must use superior judgment/skill/knowledge as he actually possesses
2) In good standing in similar community
- National standard
When are doctors liable for failure to disclose risks of treatment?
1) Serious risk
2) If disclosure was made => Reasonable person would have withheld consent to treatment
What is required for children to exercise particular standard of care?
Normal activities (subjective)
- Act as child of like age/experience/education/intelligence
- NOT 5 year old child (NOT likely to be negligent)
Potentially dangerous adult activity
- Adult standard
- E.g. Driving vehicles
What is required for common carriers to exercise particular standard of care?
1) Plaintiff is Passenger
2) Slight negligence (very high standard of care)
What is required for innkeepers to exercise particular standard of care?
1) Plaintiff is Guest
2) Slight negligence (very high standard of care)
What is required for automobile drivers to exercise particular standard of care?
Paying guests
- Ordinary care
Non-paying guests
- Ordinary care (most states)
- Recklessness (avoid wilful and wanton misconduct) (few states - Guest statutes)
What is required for bailor/bailee to exercise particular standard of care?
Bailee’s duty to Bailor
- Modern view: Ordinary standard
- Common law: High standard (sole benefit to Bailee); Low standard (sole benefit to Bailor)
Bailor’s duty to Bailee
- Must inform known defect (sole benefit to Bailee)
- Must inform known/should have known defect (mutual benefit)
What is required for Defendant to exercise particular standard of care in emergencies?
D created emergency
- Act as reasonable person would
- Emergency NOT considered
D did NOT create emergency
- Act as reasonable person would in emergency
(Negligence Per Se) What is the standard of care required for statutory standard of care to replace common law standard of care?
Negligence Per Se:
- Criminal law or regulatory statute imposes particular duty for the protection or benefit of others
- Defendant violated the statute
- Plaintiff must be in the class of people intended to be protected by the statute
- Accident must be the type of harm that the statute was intended to protect against; and
- Harm was caused by a violation of the statute
=> Negligence per se;
- Conclusive presumption of duty + breach (must prove causation + damages) (majority view)
- Rebuttable presumption of duty + breach (minority view)
When may compliance with statute excuse violation?
Compliance creates more danger than violation
Compliance is beyond D’s control
When does an owner/occupier of land owe duty to those off his premises?
Artificial conditions
- Unreasonably dangerous
Conduct of persons on premises
- Avoid unreasonable risk of harm to others
NOT natural conditions
When does an owner/occupier of land owe duty to those on his premises?
Trespassers (NO consent)
1) Discovered/Anticipated (NOT undiscovered/’no trespassing’ signs)
2) Warn/Securitize P of concealed, unsafe artificial condition (NOT natural condition)
3) Owner’s knowledge (includes Easement/License holders)
4) Risk of death/serious bodily harm
5) Reasonable care (active operations)
Attractive nuisance (duty owed to children)
1) Owner knew/should know dangerous condition (artificial/natural)
2) OWNER knew/should know children frequent in vicinity of condition
3) CHILD did NOT know dangerous condition
4) Likely to cause injury
5) Risk magnitude > Remedy expense (even slight cost)
Licensee (entered premises for P’s benefit)
1) Warn/Securitize P of concealed, unsafe artificial + natural condition (NOT discoverable)
2) Owner’s knowledge
3) Risk of death/serious bodily harm
4) Reasonable care (active operations)
- NO duty to repair/inspect known defects
Invitee (entered premises for D’s benefit (customer)/open to public)
1) Warn/Securitize P of concealed, unsafe artificial + natural condition (NOT discoverable)
2) Owner’s knowledge
3) Risk of death/serious bodily harm
4) Reasonable care (active operations)
5) Duty to reasonably inspect defects (even if not obvious)
Users of recreational land (general public)
1) NO fee
2) Dangerous condition/activity
3) Owner’s failure to warn/guard against condition was ‘wilful + malicious’
When does a lessor of land owe duty to those renting his premises?
Landlord must:
1) Warn of existing defects
- Lessor owes duty to Tenant + Guest
- Tenant owes duty to Guest
2) Lessor/Tenant knew/should know of defect
3) Lessor/Tenant knows Tenant/Guest will NOT likely discover defect by reasonable inspection
When does a sellor/vendor of land owe duty to those purchasing his premises?
1) Disclose existing defects
2) Seller knew/should know of defect
3) Seller knows Buyer will NOT likely discover defect by reasonable inspection
What is required for negligent infliction of emotional distress?
1) Negligence
2) Either;
Zone of danger
1) P was within zone of danger
2) P’s physical symptoms
Bystander case
1) P was closely related to TP victim
2) P was present at scene of injury
3) P personally observed/perceived event
4) P’s emotional distress
Special relationship
1) P + D had special relationship (doctor-patient, lawyer-client)
2) D’s negligence had great potential to cause emotional distress
Egregious conduct
1) Mishandling/Erroneous reporting of relative’s corpse/death
2) Emotional distress (NO need for physical harm)
What is required for Defendant to have affirmative duty to act?
(Generally NO duty to act)
Assumption of duty by acting
- D places P in peril => D must undertake to aid P (Reasonable care required)
- Doctor/Nurse must act with ordinary care (NOT gross care) (Good Samaritan statutes)
Placed in peril
- Innocently/Negligently
Special relationship
- Parent to protect Child
- Common carrier/Innkeeper/Shopkeeper to aid or assist patrons
- Places of accommodation to prevent TP harm to guests
TP harm prevention (parent-child/bailor-bailee)
1) D has ability to control TP’s actions
2) D has authority to control TP’s actions
3) D knew/should know TP could cause harm
What is the difference between negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress?
NIED
- P’s personal observation
- Emotional distress
- Negligence
IIED
- D’s knowledge of P’s presence + close relation
- Severe emotional distress
- Intent/Recklessness
What is required for Defendant to be liable for wrongful life?
1) Viable fetus (at time of injury)
2) Parent sues on behalf of Child for;
- Wrongful birth defect
What is the difference between wrongful birth and wrongful life lawsuits?
Wrongful birth
- Parent sues D
Wrongful life
- Parent sues D on behalf of child
What is the standard of care for doctors?
Average doctor in good standing
- National standard (some states)
- State standard (some states)
What is breach?
D’s conduct falls short of level required by applicable standard of care owed to P
- Trier of fact
By preponderance of evidence
How may custom/usage determine negligence?
Establishes standard of care
NOT establish breach (NOT conclusive)
How may statutory law determine standard of care?
1) P is in protected class of persons
2) Particular harm to be avoided
3) Statute provides criminal penalties
=> Negligence per se;
- Conclusive presumption of duty + breach (must prove causation + damages) (majority view)
- Rebuttable presumption of duty + breach (minority view)
What is res ipsa loquitor?
Very occurrence of event may tend to establish breach of duty
What is required for res ipsa loquitor to determine breach?
1) Inference of negligence: P must establish that accident causing his injury is of type that would not normally occur unless someone was negligent
2) Negligence is attributable to D based on ‘lack’ of direct evidence of D’s action causing injury
- Modern law: D is more likely than not to be negligent
- Common law: D had exclusive control of instrument causing P’s injury
3) P’s lack of ‘voluntary’ contribution towards P’s injury
=> Establishes prima facie case => Directed verdict for Plaintiff/Defendant
How may motion for directed verdict on res ipsa loquitor be determined?
By Plaintiff
- Granted: Negligence per se proven (violation of statute) + NO proximate causation issues
- Denied: Generally
By Defendant
- Granted: NO res ipsa loquitor proven + NO evidence of breach
- Denied: Res ipsa loquitor/other evidence of breach shown
What is required for causation?
1) Actual causation (causation in fact)
- ‘But for’ test
- ‘Substantial factor’ test
- Alternatives causes approach (Summers v Tice)
2) Proximate causation (legal causation)
- Direct cause (NO interruption in chain of events)
- Indirect cause (Interruption in chain of events; Intervening force comes into motion and combines with D’s act)
3) By preponderance of evidence
=> Conduct was cause of injury
What is the ‘but for’ test?
Single cause
- Act/Omission to act is cause in fact of injury
- Injury would not have occurred ‘but for’ the act
Joint causes
- Several acts combine to cause injury BUT none of the act standing alone would have been sufficient
- Injury would not have occurred ‘but for’ the acts
What is the ‘substantial factor’ test?
1) Several acts combine to cause injury
2) Either act standing alone would have been sufficient (substantial factor in causing injury)
3) Liable act is known
What is the alternative causes approach (Summers v Tice)?
1) Several acts combine to cause injury
2) Either act standing alone would have been sufficient
3) Liable act is NOT known
4) Each D must prove he is NOT negligent (burden of proof => Defendants)
- Otherwise ALL Ds are liable
What is proximate causation?
Defendant is liable for all harmful results;
- Normal incidents of D’s acts
- Within increased risk caused by D’s acts
How may Defendant be liable for direct proximate cause?
Foreseeable harmful result
- Even if occurred in unusual timing/manner
- NO uninterrupted chain of events
NOT unforeseeable harmful result
- NO summary judgment (material fact in dispute - foreseeability)