Torts Flashcards

1
Q

Elements of Negligence

A

Duty, breach, causation, damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Duty

A

You owe a duty of care to foreseeable plaintiffs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Standard of care (generally)

A

Reasonable person standard – Reasonably prudent person under the circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Standard of care (professional)

A

A professional owes a duty of reasonable care comparable to ghat of similar professionals in the community

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Standard of care (children)

A

Children must act like other children their age

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Standard of care (parents)

A

Parents have a duty of care if they knew or should have known the child would commit the tort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Duty to aid

A

Generally, there is no duty to render aid or to rescue someone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

No duty to aid or rescue, but

A

if you begin to render aid, you owe reasonable care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Special relationships, generally

A

there are certain relationships under which you always owe a duty to aid or rescue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Types of special relationships under which you must always render aid include:

A

Parent/child
Innkeeper/guest
Airline/flyer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Three categories of person entering another’s land

A

Unknown Trespasser, Known Trespasser/Licensee, and Invitee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Duty owed to Unknown Trespassers

A

No duty owed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Duty owed to Known Trespassers/Licensees + example of licensee

A

Duty to warn of known dangers

Licensees are people coming to your house, usually socially

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Duty owed to Invitees + example of invitee

A

Duty to warn, clean up, and make safe

Invitees are usually in a business situation, such as a supermarket

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Breach

A

Failure to comply with level of care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Causation (4)

A

Actual cause, proximate cause, intervening cause, and superseding. cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Actual cause

A

But for the ∆’s actions, no damage would have occurred

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Proximate cause

A

Foreseeable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Intervening cause

A

Separate act which does not cut off liability (foreseeable)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

If foreseeable:

A

it was likely to occur and defendant pays no matter what

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Superseding cause

A

Separate act that is so unforeseeable that it cuts off liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Types of superseding causes

A

1) Acts of God
2) Intentional Torts
3) Criminal Acts

23
Q

Criminal Acts exception

A

A defendant will be liable for the criminal actions of a third party if they were a reasonably foreseeable result at the time of the defendant’s negligence

24
Q

Damages

A

Actual physical harm is required, economic damage alone is not enough

25
Q

Defenses to Negligence (from one party to the other)

A

Contributory Negligence, Pure Comparative Negligence, Modified/Modern Comparative Negligence, and Assumption of Risk

26
Q

Contributory Negligence

A

If plaintiff was even 1% liable, recovery is barred

27
Q

Exception to contributory negligence

A

Last Clear Chance: defendant had the last clear chance to avoid accident and failed to do so. Plaintiff can then recover full damages.

28
Q

Pure comparative negligence

A

Plaintiff will recover, but recovery is reduced by the percentage they were negligent

29
Q

Modified/Modern Comparative Negligence

A

If plaintiff is liable for up to 50%, then they recover reduced damages. If more than 50%, they recover nothing

30
Q

Assumption of risk

A

Plaintiff understands and appreciates the risk, but goes ahead anyway

31
Q

Joint and Several liability

A

2+ people cause a single accident and liability is unknown. Plaintiff elects one ∆ to pursue and collects all damages

32
Q

After π collects in J+S liability, pursues ∆ can claim

A

Contribution: may seek contribution from co-defendant to get money back that they are not liable for

33
Q

Vicarious liability

A

Employer will be liable for the negligent actions of his employees as long as the employee was acting in the scope of their employment

34
Q

Independent contractor

A

IC are not employees, therefore the person who hired them is not responsible for their negligence

35
Q

Independent Contractor exception

A

If the job the independent contractor is doing is abnormally dangerous, or the job is a non-delegable duty (job done for the good of the public)

36
Q

Negligence Per Se Elements

A

Violation of a statute or ordinance, plaintiff was in the class protected by the statute, and the harm caused is the type that the statute was designed to protect from

37
Q

Res Ipsa Equation

A

(1)Whatever occurred does not normally occur absent negligence + (2) exclusive control by defendant = inference of negligence

38
Q

What does res ipsa question?

A

Is there even a chance that the defendant could be responsible for the injury

39
Q

Strict liability

A

Wild animals or abnormally dangerous activities

40
Q

Wild animals

A

Lions, tigers, bears. Domesticated animals possible only if they have dangerous propensities.

41
Q

Note on domesticated animals

A

Only a possessor who knows that the domesticated animal has a dangerous propensity is liable.

42
Q

FEAR in Strict Liability

A

any kind of injury that is the type of injury that you suffer when running away in fear of a wild animal is also covered under SL

43
Q

Abnormally dangerous activites

A

Blasting, explosives, hazardous chemicals,

44
Q

Defense to Strict Liability

A

Assumption of risk: the plaintiff understood and appreciated the risk and proceeded anyway

45
Q

Products liability situation

A

Plaintiff bought something, it is broken.

46
Q

Products liability theories

A

Strict Product Liability, Negligence, and Warranty

47
Q

Strict Product Liability

A

Product was defective when it left the factory, sold by seller engaged in business of selling the product, sold to a foreseeable user who used it in a manner it was intended

48
Q

Who can you sue under SPL

A

Anyone in chain who handled the product

49
Q

Negligence

A

Someone in the chain of selling failed to do something they were supposed to do

50
Q

Warranty

A

There was a label, sticker, or something in writing promising how product would work

51
Q

Nuisance types

A

Private nuisance and public nuisance

52
Q

Private nuisance

A

Unreasonable interference of an objective person’s use and enjoyment of their property (no economic loss)

53
Q

Public nuisance

A

Nuisance to the entire community brought by public official. Plaintiffs must prove special or unique harm