Torts Flashcards

1
Q

Julie has a cat named Brooke

A
  • tortoiseshell cat
  • has “tortitude”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

torts

A
  • torts are wrongful actions
  • civil offenses, not part of criminal law at all
  • Some torts have the same name as criminal offenses
    • If someone punches you in the face, they can
      • be charged with the crime of assault
      • also be sued in civil court for the tort of assault
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

tortfeasor

A
  • person who commits a tort is called a tortfeasor
  • usually the defendant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

9/11 death benefits distribution

A
  • Judge Feinberg developed a formula for determining future wages
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
  • McDonald’s Case - basic *
A
  • Stella Liebeck
  • 79 years old
  • Albuquerque
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

McDonald’s case - details

A
  • Facts
    • 49 cent cup of coffee
    • Passenger in car that went through drive-thru at McDonalds
    • Spilled entire cup of coffee on lap, stayed there for 90 seconds
    • 3rd degree burns on 6% of her skin, lesser burns on 16%
    • 8 days in the hospital, skin grafts; lost 20 pounds (down to 83 pounds)
    • Two years of medical treatment
  • Damages
    • Stella sought for medical costs of $20,000
    • McDonalds offered $800
  • Lawsuit
    • Retained Texas attorney named Reed Morgan
    • Filed a suit for gross negligence in New Mexico second judicial district court
    • • Gross negligence for selling coffee that was “unreasonably dangerous and defectively manufactured”
    • $90,000; $225,000
    • McDonalds franchises required coffee to be served at 180-190 degrees
      • In two seconds it would cause 3rd degree burns
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

McDonalds case - ruling

A
  • • Comparative negligence
  • o Jury found McDonalds was 80% negligent
  • o And Stella Liebeck was 20% negligent
  • • Jury awarded
  • o $200,000 in compensatory damages (then reduced by 20%)
  • o $2.7 million in punitive damages (2 days of coffee revenues)
  • o Judge reduced damages to $480,000 (three times compensatory damages)
  • • Finally settled out of court for less than $600,000
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Starbucks case

A
  • Man burned by hot tea from an “improperly lidded cup”
  • 3rd degree burns to hand
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Green v. Boddie Noel Enterprises (Hardees)

A
  • 1997
  • Case filed in US District Court Western District
  • Diversity of citizenship applied
  • Virginia law
  • Products liability
  • Summary judgement motion
    • Ruled Green cannot make a prima facie case
    • Green lost; Hardees won
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

classification of torts

A
  • Intentional torts
    • against persons
    • against property
  • Unintentional torts (negligence torts)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

intentional torts against persons

A

Focus on these three

  • Assault and battery
  • False imprisonment
  • Defamation (libel and slander)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

tort of Assault and battery

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

tort of False imprisonment

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

tort of Intentional infliction of emotional distress

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Intentional torts against property

A
  • Focus on conversion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

conversion

A
  • Similar to crime of larceny
  • intentional tort against property
17
Q

appropriation

A
  • The use by one person of another person’s name, likeness, or other identifying characteristic, without permission and for the benefit of the user
  • Right to privacy includes right to exclusive use of his or her identity
  • States have statutes preventing appropriation
  • In general, courts have ruled that names can be used if they are reverencing an idea, but not for exploitation
18
Q

trespass to personal property

A
  • intentional tort against property
19
Q

Celebrity appropriation:

Rosa Parks and OutKast

A
  • Outkast amed a song “Rosa Parks”
  • Rosa Parks family did not like the use of her name
  • Family sued the record label in federal court
  • Settled out of court—charity and education
20
Q

Celebrity appropriation:

Naked Cowboy

A
  • Robert Burke
  • Street performer in NYC
  • Appears in ads for Chevy, licensed his name and likeness to companies
  • M&Ms decided to use his likeness in the form of a naked cowboy M&M on billboards in Times Square
  • Burke sued in federal court for appropriation, but eventually focused on trademark
  • Court ruled that …
21
Q

proximate cause

A
22
Q

defamation

A
  • Libel – written defamation
  • Slander – spoken defamation
  • Defamation must be made public, published
  • Public figures have a higher burden to prove defamation: must prove “actual malice” (the knowledge of falsity or the reckless disregard for the truth)
23
Q

assault and battery

A
24
Q

false imprisonment

A
25
Q

defenses to negligence torts

A
  • Contributory negligence
    • few jurisdictions
    • Plaintiff recovers nothing if he is at fault
  • Comparative negligence
    • more common
    • As long as plaintiff is less than 50% at fault, he can recover pro rata share of verdict
26
Q

Harris Teeter v. Burroughs - details

A
  • Supreme Court of Virginia, 1991
  • Product liability case
  • Burroughs ate the cake
  • Ordered a sheet cake from the store for birthday party with rainbow icing only
  • Found that cake had two plastic birds on it
  • White birds were resting on white clouds
  • She added candles and added plastic carebear ornaments
  • Kids did not eat birds
  • Plaintiff swallowed a piece of cake whole without chewing
  • Plaintiff had plastic bird removed from colon a few weeks later
  • Main issue was whether placing white birds on white clouds was negligent
27
Q

Harris Teeter v. Burroughs - ruling

A
  • Birds were not “deleterious substance” (foreign matter) in food
  • Court ruled that Harris Teeter was not negligent because cake was free from foreign matter and was fit for human consumption