Torts Flashcards
Trespass requires
1) An act of physical invasion on Plaintiffs real property
2) Intent to enter the piece of land
3) Causation
Defendant does not personally enter the land but sets something in motion to cause a physical invasion
Trespass bc trespass does not require personal entry if D’s act causes the entry
D accidental destroys Ps computer, but she can repair it, how much is owed?
The conversion damages =
The fair market value, which is how much the computer was worth before destroyed
Conversion elements
1) act interfering with plaintiffs right to possession in the Chattel
2) intent to perform act that interferes with P’s right to possession
3) Causation
4) Damages are serious enough to warrant D pay Full Value of Chattel
Conversion damages
Fair market value (the full value before damage)
Self defense requires
The right to use deadly force:
There was 1) real danger or reasonable appearance of danger,
And
2) a reasonable person would have acted similarly under the circumstances
Traditional duty of an owner or occupier of land
Depends on the legal status of P as either an invitee, licensee, or trespasser
Invitee
Enters premises in response to express or implied invitation of landowner
Ex: if held open to the public for
• public areas
•businesses
Licensee
Enters onto land with the possessors permission for his own purpose
Ex: social guests
How to lose invitee status
If exceeds scope of the invitation
Landowner does not owe a duty for areas outside of invitee’s scope of invitation
Violation of a statute may be excused by the trier of fact if
Compliance was beyond their control
(Look for the cause in fact)
Amusement park ride malfunctions, Childs seatbelt wasn’t secure and is injured
Child will win bc ride operator failed to use reasonable care in securing seat belt
Doctrine of vicarious liability
Imposes liability on an employer for the tortious conduct of its employer occurring within the scope of the employment relationship
Is manufacturer liable if someone mounts TV on ceiling and it falls?
Yes if knew that sometimes was mounted in that way, then need to warn
Courts in strict liability cases require a commercial supplier to anticipate:
Reasonable foreseeable use and misuse and must provide warnings for both
Manufacturer is liable for supplying a defective product