Torts Flashcards
False Imprisonment elements
(1) Act or omission
(2) Intent
(3) Causation
A defendant confines a plaintiff indirectly through
threats of imminent force that reasonably imply actual use of force against the Plaintiff’s person, property, or immediate family
A defendant does NOT confine a plaintiff indirectly when
Plaintiff responds to the threats of imminent force by walking away or leaving the area
Shopkeeper’s Privilege from False Imprisonment when
(1) the defendant uses reasonable nondeadly force to restrain a person
(2) on a reasonable belief of shoplifting
(3) for a reasonable time and manner
(4) for the purposes of investigation
Assault exists when Defendant intended, acted, and caused
Plaintiff to have a reasonable apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact to their person or extension.
To establish a prima facie case of assault, plaintiff must prove
(1) Act
(2) Intent
(3) Causation
(4) Apprehension
The act for assault is
one that creates a reasonable apprehension of harmful or offensive contact to the person
The intent for assault is
intentionally acting to cause apprehension of such contact.
The cause for assault is
the act did in fact cause a reasonable apprehension.
The apprehension for assault is
a sense of expectation that is reasonable under the circumstances judged by a reasonable person standard.
Irrelevant facts to establishing assault is
(1) plaintiff’s subjective thoughts, fears, or feelings, physical prowess,
(2) the source or identity of the contact,
(3) the actual ability to make contact, apparent ability from a reasonable person is enough.
Privileged False Imprisonment
(1) shopkeeper
(2) citizen’s arrest
Citizen’s Arrest Privilege from False Imprisonment when
(1) a private citizen knows that a felony has actually been committed
(2) and has reasonable belief that the person they are arresting is the one who committed the felony.
Defendant’s intent to cause a tort against one person may be applied, i.e., transferred to
(1) an unintended victim
(2) an unintended tort
(3) an unintended tort on an unintended victim
Plaintiff establishes damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress when she provides evidence of
actual damages, at minimum severe emotional distress
The prima facie elements of trespass to chattel are
(1) Act
(2) Intent
(3) Cause
(4) Damages
The act for trespass to chattel is
one that interferes with a person’s (not necessarily the owner) right of possession in personal property, namely dispossessing or intermeddling.
The intent for trespass to chattel is
one that intends to perform the act that causes the interference, they need not intend to cause or intend the interference
The cause for trespass to chattel is when
Defendant’s act in fact interfered with right of possession
The damages for trespass to chattel is
actual damages, depriving or diminishing the chattel’s value
Intermeddling is
in the context of trespass to chattel, the conduct that directly damages the chattel.
dispossessing is
int the context of trepsass to chattel, the conduct that prevents possession of the chattel.