Torts Flashcards
False Imprisonment
- intending to confine or restrain within boundaries fixed by D
- those actions indirectly/directly result in such confinement
- P is conscious of confinement or is harmed by it
Battery
- D causes harmful or offensive contact
2. Acts with intent to cause such contact, or apprehension of contact
Assault
D acts with intent to cause harmful or offensive contact (or imminent apprehension) and an imminent apprehension directly or indirectly results
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
- D is liable for intentionally or recklessly acting
- with extreme and outrageous conduct
- that causes P severe emotional distress
Conversion
- D intentionally commits an act
- Depriving the P of possession of her chattel or interfering (dominion or control) with P’s chattel
- in a manner so serious as to deprive P of the use for chattel
* damages are chattel’s full value at time of conversion
Trespass to land
- D’s intentional act
- causes a physical invasion of P’s land
- *need only intent to enter
- *D does not need to know that the land belongs to another
Private nuisance
- a thing or activity that substantially and unreasonably interferes with another’s individual use and enjoyment of their land
Substantial Interference (Private Nuisance)
offensive, inconvenient, or annoying to a normal, reasonable person in the community
Public nuisance
An unreasonable interference with a right common to the general public
ex. air pollution, interference with use of public highways
Does a private citizen have a claim for public nuisance?
Yes, but only if they suffer harm that is different in kind from that suffered by the general public
Trespasser
Someone who enters or remains upon the land of another w/out consent or privilege to do so
Attractive Nuisance
Land possessor may be liable for injuries to children trespassing on the land if
- An artificial condition exists in a place where the land possessor knows or has reason to know children are likely to trespass
- land possessor knows or has reason to know that the condition poses an unreasonable risk of death or seriously bodily injury to children
- children do not discover or cannot appreciate the danger presented by the condition
- burden of maintaining the condition and burden of eliminating the danger are slight compare to the risk of harm
- land possessor fails to exercise reasonable care to protect children
Res Ipsa Loquitur
Circumstantial evidence of negligence that does not change the standard of care (does not apply if there is direct evidence of the cause of the injury)
- accident was of a kind that ordinarily does not occur in the absence of negligence
- it was caused by an agent or instrumentality within the exclusive control of the D; and
- it was not due to any action on the part of P
Bystander Recovery (negligent infliction of emotional distress)
Most states allow a bystander P outside the zone of danger to recover for emotional distress if that P
- is closely related to the person injured by the D
- was present at the scene of the injury; and
- personally observed the injury
*emotional distress must be manifested by physical symptoms
Detour
Minor and permissible deviation from the scope of employment