Tort of Rylands v Fletcher Flashcards

1
Q

What is the tort of Rylands v Fletcher?

A

Where the defendant brings/stores something on land which could cause mischief if it escapes, the thing is non-natural and escapes onto adjoining property, causing damage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is required for the tort of Rylands v Fletcher to apply?

A

The thing itself must escape from one property to another property, meaning the thing must escape from D’s land to C’s land.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What must be established for a party to be a claimant?

A

C must have proprietary interest in the land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What must be established for a party to be a defendant?

A

D has to have control over land being an owner/occupier of the land where accumulation is stored

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the first element?

A

D must have brought a substance onto the land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Give a case where thing was brought onto land

A

Giles v Walker

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Why was there no liability in Giles v Walker?

A

No liability when weed spread onto neighbouring land as they were growing there naturally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Name the case for mischief

A

Hale v Jenning Bros

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Name the case for non natural use of land by storing thing

A

Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Name the case that defined ‘where there is an increased risk of dangers to others due to it’s accumulation

A

Rickard v Lothian

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Name the case where thing must escape from one property to another property

A

Read v Lyons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Name the case where unnatural storage became natural due to the social benefit

A

British Celanese v Hunt Ltd.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

name the case that included escape of fire

A

Stannard v Gore

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What were the main facts and outcome of Stannard v Gore

A

Fire broke out on D’s property and spread to their tyres which travelled to C’s land.

OUTCOME: as the fire escaped and not ‘thing’, the claim failed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Main facts of Hale v Jennings Bros

A

D was liable as the risk of injury was foreseeable if the car on a fairground ride came loose.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Main facts for Giles v Walker

A

There was no liability for weeds spreading onto neighbouring land as they were growing there naturally

17
Q

The thing must be likely to do _____ if it escapes

A

mischief

18
Q

List 5 potentially dangerous properties that can show ‘thing’ is likely to do mischief

A

sticky, liquid, flammable, large, heavy

19
Q

What is the case for proprietary interest?

A

Transco v Stockport MBC

20
Q

Name the 4 defences that leads to no liability for D

A
  • An act of God
  • An act of a stranger
  • Statutory authority
  • Consent
21
Q

Name the defence where only damages may be reduced

A

Contributory negligence (C contribute to their own losses)

22
Q

What is an act of God?

A

extreme weather conditions

23
Q

What is the case name for act of God defence?

A

Nichols v Marsland

24
Q

Main facts and outcome of Nichols v Marsland?

A

thunderstorms + rain broke the banks of D’s artificial lakes -> caused destruction of C’s bridge - No liability

25
Q

What can an act of a stranger do?

A

absolve the D of liability

26
Q

What is the case for an act of stranger defence?

A

Perry v Kendrick Transport

27
Q

Main facts and outcome of Perry v Kendrick Transport

A

stranger removed petrol cap + child was injured when another child threw a match into the tank - No liability

28
Q

What is statutory authority?

A

An act of Parliament authorises D’s action

29
Q

What is the case for statutory authority defence?

A

Marcic v Thames Water PLC

30
Q

What is consent? (non fit injuria)

A

C has consented to the accumulation of the ‘thing’ by the D

31
Q

What does it mean if C can contribute to their own losses?

A

C is partly responsible for the escape of ‘thing’

32
Q

Name the case for the defence of consent

A

Haynes v Harwood

33
Q

Name the case for the defence of c’s own losses

A

Stayers v Harlow

34
Q

Main facts of Haynes v Harwood?

A

D was liable as C did not consent to the risk of injury from their runaway horse

35
Q

What 3 parts is Transco a key case for?

A
  • proprietary interest
  • Extraordinary & unusual use of land
  • R v F does not cover personal injury
36
Q

Name the case for remoteness test

A

Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather

37
Q

Name the case for inherent risk

A

Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather plc.

38
Q

What is the potential defence for social utility

A

There may defence against the remedy of an injunction & instead may award damages