Tort - Occupiers - non-visitors Flashcards

1
Q

What can be claimed under OLA 1984 by non-visitors?

A

Personal injury only πŸ‘ΉπŸ€•

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What’s the definition of a trespasser under OLA 1984?

A
  • Someone who goes onto landπŸšΆβ€β™‚οΈ
  • w/o invitation 😐 &
  • presence is either unknown πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈto proprietor or
  • if known, practically objected 🀬to
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

For a trespasser to be owed a DoC, what is required?
πŸ‘Ή

A
  1. D actual knowledge of danger/reasonable grounds to believe it existed πŸ§¨πŸ‘€
  2. D actual knowledge aware/reasonable grounds that C was in vicinity of danger or may come into vicinity, and knew this at time of accident πŸšΆβ€β™‚οΈπŸ‘€
  3. Danger one reasonable to expected D to protect trespasser from βš–οΈπŸ‘ΉπŸ›‘οΈπŸ§¨
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What case shows awareness of danger under OLA 1984 for non-visitors?
πŸ‘€πŸ§¨

A
  • C dived into a lake onto fiberglass container, C wasn’t aware it was there so no duty owed.

πŸ€ΏπŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What case shows knowledge of in the vicinity under OLA 1984 for non-visitors?
πŸ‘€πŸšΆβ€β™‚οΈ

A
  • D aware that people swam in harbour during the summer, but not in the winter.

πŸŠβ€β™‚οΈπŸ›₯️🌞❌πŸ₯Ά

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What cases shows breach under OLA 1984 for non-visitors?
πŸ‘Ή

A
  • Fence around factory, 9 year old fell through roof - no liability
    πŸ‘ΉπŸ°πŸ­πŸ€•πŸ‘
  • no fence around school, knew kids climbed on roof, child fell through roof, liable.
    πŸ‘ΉπŸšΆβ€β™‚οΈπŸ§‘β€πŸ«πŸ‘€πŸ€•πŸ‘Ž
  • Fence around pool, warning sign, drunk teenager jumped in - not liable.
    πŸ‘ΉπŸͺ§πŸŠπŸΊπŸ‘
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the SoC for OLA 1984 for non-visitors?

A

That of a reasonable occupier - court considers normal factors plus:
- Nature of danger
- C is child or adult
- Nature of premises
- Purpose of C
- Whether occupier could/should have foreseen trespassing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is required of a sign to be a defence under 1984?

A

Needs to warn of danger ⚠️

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What defences are there for both OLA 1957 and 1984?

A
  • Consent: must be fully aware of particular risk & shown through conduct
    🀝
  • Contributory negligence (where C is a child, judged against reasonable child of same age)
    πŸ€πŸ•³οΈ
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What’s the difference between the effect of a warning notice vs an exclusion notice?

A

Warning Notice: relevant to breach & whether D discharged DoC βš οΈβœ…

Exclusion Notice: operates as potential defence once claim established 🫡🀺

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What restrictions are there on occupiers who can restrict/modify their liability?

A

a) Occupier can’t, by contract, exclude/restrict common DoC which they owe to a 3rd party i.e strangers to contract who must be allowed to enter πŸ“„πŸ“­
b) Restricts use of clauses for B2B for personal injury/death or is not reasonable πŸ§‘β€πŸ³πŸ‘·β€β™€οΈπŸ“„πŸ€•β˜ οΈ
c) for B2C, trader can’t exclude/restrict liability if term/notice is unfair πŸ§‘β€πŸ³πŸ‘¨β€πŸ¦°πŸ“„πŸ€₯
d) Principle of common humanity🫑

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly