Tort - Occupiers - non-visitors Flashcards
What can be claimed under OLA 1984 by non-visitors?
Personal injury only πΉπ€
Whatβs the definition of a trespasser under OLA 1984?
- Someone who goes onto landπΆββοΈ
- w/o invitation π &
- presence is either unknown π€·ββοΈto proprietor or
- if known, practically objected π€¬to
For a trespasser to be owed a DoC, what is required?
πΉ
- D actual knowledge of danger/reasonable grounds to believe it existed π§¨π
- D actual knowledge aware/reasonable grounds that C was in vicinity of danger or may come into vicinity, and knew this at time of accident πΆββοΈπ
- Danger one reasonable to expected D to protect trespasser from βοΈπΉπ‘οΈπ§¨
What case shows awareness of danger under OLA 1984 for non-visitors?
ππ§¨
- C dived into a lake onto fiberglass container, C wasnβt aware it was there so no duty owed.
π€Ώπ€·ββοΈ
What case shows knowledge of in the vicinity under OLA 1984 for non-visitors?
ππΆββοΈ
- D aware that people swam in harbour during the summer, but not in the winter.
πββοΈπ₯οΈπβπ₯Ά
What cases shows breach under OLA 1984 for non-visitors?
πΉ
- Fence around factory, 9 year old fell through roof - no liability
πΉπ°ππ€π - no fence around school, knew kids climbed on roof, child fell through roof, liable.
πΉπΆββοΈπ§βπ«ππ€π - Fence around pool, warning sign, drunk teenager jumped in - not liable.
πΉπͺ§ππΊπ
What is the SoC for OLA 1984 for non-visitors?
That of a reasonable occupier - court considers normal factors plus:
- Nature of danger
- C is child or adult
- Nature of premises
- Purpose of C
- Whether occupier could/should have foreseen trespassing
What is required of a sign to be a defence under 1984?
Needs to warn of danger β οΈ
What defences are there for both OLA 1957 and 1984?
- Consent: must be fully aware of particular risk & shown through conduct
π€ - Contributory negligence (where C is a child, judged against reasonable child of same age)
π€π³οΈ
Whatβs the difference between the effect of a warning notice vs an exclusion notice?
Warning Notice: relevant to breach & whether D discharged DoC β οΈβ
Exclusion Notice: operates as potential defence once claim established π«΅π€Ί
What restrictions are there on occupiers who can restrict/modify their liability?
a) Occupier canβt, by contract, exclude/restrict common DoC which they owe to a 3rd party i.e strangers to contract who must be allowed to enter ππ
b) Restricts use of clauses for B2B for personal injury/death or is not reasonable π§βπ³π·ββοΈππ€β οΈ
c) for B2C, trader canβt exclude/restrict liability if term/notice is unfair π§βπ³π¨βπ¦°ππ€₯
d) Principle of common humanityπ«‘