Tort Law - Negligence and Psychiatric Injury Flashcards
Reasonable person test
Blyth
Standard of learners
Nettleship v Weston
Standard of professionals
Bolam
Standard of children
Mullin v Richards
Size of risk
Bolton v Stone
Magnitude of likely harm
Paris v Stepney Borough Council
Cost and effort of preventing
Latimer
Social benefit
Watt v Hertfordshire CC
Factual Cause
Barnett
Legal Cause
Wagon Mound
Physical symptoms of fear and panic do not amount to psychiatric injury
Reilly v Merseyside
Grief and sorrow do not account for psychiatric injury
Hinz v Berry
Directly involved in the zone of danger
Dulieu v White
Rescuers
Hale v London Underground
Criteria for secondary victims
Alcock
Close ties of love and affection
Mcloughlin v O’Brian
Bystanders
Bourhill v Young
Not immediate aftermath
Taylorson
Was the immediate aftermath
Atkinson
Duty of care
Robinson
Reasonably forseeable
Kent v Griffiths
Ambulance staff
Kent v Griffiths
Children
Mullin v Richards
Doctors
Bolam
Drivers
Nettleship v Weston
Employers
Paris v Stepney borough council
Fireman
Watt v Hertfordshire
Manufacturers
Donoghue v Stevenson
Police officers
Robinson
Property owners
Miller
Transportation
The Wagon Mound
Workmen
Hale v London Underground