Tort Exam - Revision Flashcards

1
Q

What claim am I advising Henry on

A

If the manufacturer owes duty of care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

1) What did the manufacturer in question make?

2) How was this shipped

3) What happened when Henry took the plates out of the box

4) what injury did this lead to

A

1) Dinners sets

2) in a cardboard box and bubble wrap

3) they shattered

4) cuts to Henry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

A) What is the 3 part test for duty of care?

B) What case set this out?

A

A)

  1. Was it reasonably foreseeable
  2. Was there a relationship of proximity
  3. Is it fair and reasonable to recognise duty

B) Caparo Industries v Dickman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

1) What is Mr West looking to sue Henry for?

2) What route is he potentially going down?

A

1) Loud Noise

2) Private Nuisance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

A) What are the two kinds of damage which can lead to action in private nuisance

B) Which will Mr West claim under

A

1) Actual Damage
2) Interference with amenity

B) Interference with amenity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

1) Who can sue under private nuisance

2) Does Mr West fit into this criteria

3) which case solidified this

A

1) Anyone with an “interest in the land”

2) Yes

3) Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd [1996]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define Private Nuisance

A

“Any unlawful interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of land or some right over it”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

1) What is the question to determine private nuisance?

2) what quote from Southwark LBC v Mills [2001] solidifies the courts view on the flexibility of a neighbour

A

If it is a “reasonable use of the land”

2) “Some interference must be expected”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is always considered in determining if a use of land was reasonable

A

Intensity, Intention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is sometimes considered in determining if a use of land was reasonable

A

Sensitivity of claimant, Locality rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What kind of claim is Greg looking to make following his car crash

A

Vicarious Liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What makes an employer liable for an employees negligence

A

If they are negligent “while acting in the course of his employment”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Who does the claimant have to prove is liable in vicarious liability cases

A

ONLY the employee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the 5 stages of the economic reality test for employment

A

1) Does the person use their own premises or equipment
2) does the person hire their own helper
3) The degree of financial risk they take
4) The degree of responsibility they have for investment and management
5) how far the person has the opportunity of profiting from sound management in the performance of their task

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Test of Negligence

A
  1. Resonable forseeability
  2. Relationship of proximity
  3. fair and resonable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the latin for “the thing speaks for itself”

A

Res Ipsa Loquitur

16
Q

What does the bolam test say

A

that a professional will be assumed to have the skills they claim to have

17
Q

What test aims to prove if the defendant was the cause of the damage

A

The “but for” test

18
Q

What is the standard for a negligence claim?

A

The “but for” test

19
Q

What case holds that when the probability of harm is higher then the court is more likely to rule in favour of them

A

Bolton v Stone [1951]

20
Q

Who does the Occupiers Liability Act 1957 cover

A

Lawful visitors

21
Q

What is the definition of occupier

A

“Control of the premises with a sufficient degree of control”

22
Q

Is it the visitor or the premises that needs to be safe