Tort Class defense to Intentional tort Flashcards
self defense
the exercise of REASONABLE force to repel an attack upon one’s person or to avoid confinement
- use of reasonable force
- to counter an attacking or offensive force
- necessary to prevent bodily injury, offensive contact, or confinement
reasonable force
- force cannot be greater than what is reasonably necessary to dispel the attacking force
- the victim of an assault or battery may not turn aggressive once the assailant is incapacitated
necessary force
reasonably perceived as required to rebuff an attack or confinement
defense of persons or property
action taken to protect another individual or property from harm (including freeing someone subject to false imprisonment)
- use of REASONABLE force
- to defend or protect a 3rd party from injury
- when the 3rd party is threatened by an attacking force
defense of property
a property owner has the right to possess and safe guard his or her property from damage or dispossession
- use of REASONABLE force
- to protect property from damage or dispossession
- when another person, the invader, attempts to injure or wrongfully take possession of the property
Ejectment
the use of reasonable force to expel a trespasser to land
Castle doctrin
a person is not required to flee his or her home if threatened by an intruder and may use any amount of force including deadly force to resist an intruder
rightfull repossession
an owner of personal property generally has the right to repossess, by force if necessary, a chattel that has been wrongfully taken or withheld
- use of reasonable force
- to retake possession of personal property
- of which the owner has been wrongfully dispossessed
- provided the efforts to retake the chattel are made PROMPTLY after the original dispossession or denial of possession occurs
wrongful denial of possession
most cases deal with bailments
“the owners chattel have been unlawfully denied”
consent
- voluntary acceptance of an intentionally tortuous act
2. with full knowledge or understanding of the consequences
informed consent
a victim’s mental capacity; coercing is not acceptable meaning one only consented because of duress
implied consent
expressed either orally or in writing, or may be implied by conduct or circumstances
mistake
the good faith belief, based upon incorrect information that one is justified in committing an intentional tort under the circumstances
- good faith conviction that one’s actions are justified
- with the belief based up on faulty information
- the conduct would otherwise be considered tortuous but for the erroneous belief
privilege
a legal justification to engage in otherwise tortuous conduct in order to accomplish a compelling social goal
- privilege presumes that the intentional fort is legally justified because of the higher purpose to to be achieived
necessity
the tortfeasor is justified in engaging in an intentional tort to prevent more serious injury from external force
- committing an intentional tort
- to avert more serious injury
- caused by a force other than the tortfeasor
- and the torfeasor’s actions were REASONABLY necessary to avert the greater harm