Tort Flashcards

1
Q

What must a claimant show for trespass of land?

A

Exclusive possession of land
- Land: including buildings, subsoil or airspace (up to hight necessary for ordinary use)

Direct Interference
- stepping foot on it, taking possession of it, placing something on it, throwing something on it, allowing animals to stray on it,encroachement of buildings

Intention
- D must only intend to enter land / do act of direct interference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the elements of trespass to goods?

A

Intentional and direct interference with C’s possession of goods

Interference
- taking goods, damaging goods, moving goods

Intention
- defendant must intend to interfere with goods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the tort of conversion (and elements)?

A

Deal with goods in what which is seriously inconsistent with the rights of the owner.

Intention
- must intend to do the act which interferes with goods But not to infringe C’s rights

Acts of Conversion
- theft, wrongful transfer, wrongful detention, substantially changing, securely damaging or misusing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How is a novel duty of care established (elements)?

A

Foreseeability
- C must be a foresee victim
- D’s negligence must have created a foreseeable risk of harm to C

Proximity
- must be a relationship of sufficient proximity between C and D

Just Fair and Reasonable
- court will consider if it just fair and reasonable in all circumstances to impose a duty of care
- includes policy factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Can you breach duty of care through omission

A

No unless:

Special relationship between parties
- parent/child
- assumed responsibility towards claimant

Control
- if D exercises control over C

Effect
-controler is liable due to own negligence not to supervise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What will the court take into account in assessing if D’s conduct fell below the reasonable standard of care?

A

Magnitude of risk involved in the activity undertaken by the defendant
- likelihood of harm
- seriousness of potential harm

The practicality of taking precautions to avoid the risk
- court will balance the practicability of taking precautions against risk in question
- will also consider social utility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the test for causation in fact? (different situations)

A

But for test

If multiple possible causes:
- still but for test
- on balance of probabilities

If multiple causes working together
- material contribution test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

If multiple defendants contribute to the same damage of the claimant how is this dealt with?(diviable or not, successive)

A

Divisable
- some injuries (deafness) are divisible so C can only recover proportionate damages from each defendant

Not Divisible
- can recover from either defendant
- that defendant can recover contribution from the other(s) in amount court considers just and equitable

Successive Injuries
- second defendant only liable to extent that their negligence made Cs damage worse than it already was
- so nothing recoverable if they did not make it worse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What might be considered as part of negligent misstatement?

A

Professional negligence claims for not properly executing will
- by beneficiaries

As special relationship exists between solicitors and and beneficiaries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Can vicarious liability exist even if the person is not an Employee?

A

Yes if it is a relationship making to employment.

Factors:
- the tort was committed as a result of an activity undertaken by the tortfeasor on behalf of the defendant
- tortfeasor’s activity is an integral part of the defendants business activity (rather than own business); and
- defendant created the risk of the tort by assigning the activity to tortfeasor.

Then must show
- the tort so closely connected with the task the employee was employed to do that it would be fair and just to hold the employer liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What damages are available if only if claimant dies as a result of the tort? What are the requirements?

A

Bereavement only to:
- spouse/civil partner;
- cohabiting as spouse for 2+ year immediately before death; or
- parents (if deceased was a minor and never married)

Loss of Dependancy if:

Funeral expenses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What defences can an occupier use against claims of occupiers liability?

A

Exclusion of Liability
- statutory rules apply

Voluntary Assumption of Risk

Contributory Negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How can occupiers exclude liability for lawful visitors?

A

Must give effective notice. Must be:

clear that wording of the exclusion covers damage in question; and
exclusion must have been adequately brought to attention of claimant.
Contractual Exclusion
- must be incorporated into contract by being brought to attention before contract was made

Non-contractual Exclusion
- must take adequate steps to bring to the attention of visitors before the encounter risk for which liability is excluded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When does an occupier owe a duty to a trespasser?

A

Only if all below are satisfied:

  1. occupier is (or ought reasonably to be) aware of danger;
  2. Occupier is (or ought reasonably to be) aware that trespasser may come into the vicinity of the danger; and
  3. The danger is one against which it would, in all circumstances, be reasonable to expect the occupier to offer protection.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

When does manufactureer owe duty of care?

A

Manufacturer of product owes duty of care to end consumer if:

  1. the manufacturer puts the product into circulation in the form in which it is intended to reach end consumer; and
  2. there is no reasonable expectation of an intermediate examination of product between leaving manufacturer and reaching consumer.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What constitutes a defect under strict liability regime?

A

If products safety is not such as persons generally are entitled to expect

All circumstances taken into account including:
- instructions and warnings provided;
- product packaging and purpose for which it is marketed;
- what might reasonably be expected to be done with product; and
- time when the product was supplied.

17
Q

What types of damage cannot be recovered under strict liability regime?

A

damage to defective product itself

damage to business property

property damage that does not exceed £275

18
Q

What defences are available under strict liability regime?

A

No defect when the product was first put into circulation

D to show there was no defect when product was supplied to consumer, importer or own brander

Defendant did not supply the product in the course of business.

State of the arm defence

Contributory negligence

19
Q

What must a defendant show to prove a product was not supplied in the course of business

A

Defence to Strict Liability Regime

Defendant must show:
- D were not acting in the course of a business when they supplied the product; and

Either
- D either was not the producer (or own brander / importer) of product
- D was not acting with a view to profit

20
Q

What are examples of damage suitable for private nuisance?

A

physical damage to land (eg. flooding, damage caused by vibrations)

amenity damage (eg. noise, dust and smells)

encroachment onto land (eg. overhanging tree branches)

21
Q

Can an occupier of land be liable for private nuisance if this is created by trespassers or natural events?

A

Yes if the adopt or continue the nuisance

Adopt
- if occupier make use of the thing that constitutes the nuisance for there own use

Continue
- if once they know or ought to have know =n about it, they fail to take reasonable steps to deal with it

22
Q

How is the reasonableness of interference with land assessed in private nuisance?

A

Factors taken into account:

  1. Intensity and duration
    - including time of day or night
  2. Character of Neighbourhood
  3. Malice
    - something may become unreasonable if motived by malice

Not Taken into account
1. Abnormal Sensitivity
- does not play a factor

  • OR reasonable care by d
23
Q

What defences are available for nuisance

A
  1. Prescription
    - if D has carried on the nuisance for at least 20 years (as actionable private nuisance) and no action taken
    - requires that there was someone in occupation of nearby land who was effected
  2. statutory aurhority
    - courts to decided if nuisance itself is authorised by statute
24
Q

When should you bring action for private nuisance vs public nuisance

A

Private
- if injury to person or persons property

Public
- no need to show legal interest in land

25
Q

If an employee breaches a company rule not allowing non-employees to help them with job and the person is injured will the company be liable?

A

Yes

26
Q

When can claim for dependance and for what?

A

Who
- spouse, former spouse or person living as spouse for 2 years
- partner or treated as parent
- child or treated as child in relation to any marriage
- any brother, sister, uncle or aunt (and their issue)

When
- financial support
- services

27
Q

Buyers of company relied on accounts that turn out to be false. Can negligent misstatement claim be made by buyer of company against the target companies accounts?

A

No
- cannot bring claim against accountants for who negligently audited annual financial statement
- as accountants only owe duty of care to company not general public

28
Q

A negligently damages power line to B’s factory.

B’s furnace shuts down. £100 of metal currency smelting is lost. B expected to make a £100 profit from the metal destroyed. B also loses profits (£400) from 4 subsequent melts they are unable to do whilst power is down.

What can be recovered?

A

Only
- £100 for metal destroyed
- £100 for profit on destroyed metal
(as the profit is consequential loss to damage of the metal)

The opportunity cost of subsequent melts is pure economic loss

NOTE
- may have been able to recover all if B had owned the electric cable