Tort Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What type of injury do you need for a negligence case

A

Actual injury, pure economic loss isn’t going to cut it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Do you need a substantial loss for intentional interference with a contract?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Can you be liable for your guest’s actions?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Are attorney’s fees in a personal injury suit recoverable?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

If your negligence causes harm, are you liable to rescuers?

A

Yes, because “danger invites rescue” (guy in the house falling down the stairs)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

If you think you are hitting a non-person (furniture, alien, etc.) can you be liable for battery?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Pure several jurisdiction

A

each party is only liability for their percent of the damages (can’t collect everything from one party)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What risks do you need to discuss for informed consent?

A

all the risks (even if you don’t think it applies to that patient)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

If a wild animal is properly confined, is the owner liable for injuries from fearful reactions to them?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

If you place a person in peril, are you under a duty to protect them from further injury caused by that peril

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

If an employee is acting within the scope of their employment, do clear instructions shield the employer from vicarious liability?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Elements for slander

A

Slander = written defamation

(i) the defendant’s defamatory language, (ii) is of or concerning the plaintiff, (iii) is published to a third party who understands its defamatory nature, and (iv) it damages the plaintiff’s reputation.

Note: don’t need to
prove the defendant knew the statement was false unless public figure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

For matters of public concern or public figures, what additionally must the plaintiff prove for defamation?

A

the plaintiff is constitutionally required to prove fault on the part of the defendant for matters of public concern. If the plaintiff is either a public official or a public figure, then the plaintiff must prove actual malice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Does assault require you to be aware of the upcoming danger?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the two IIED situations?

A

there is intent to cause severe emotional distress or the D is reckless as to the risk of causing emotional distress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When is the owner strictly liable for wild animal harm

A

The harm must come as a consequence of a dangerous propensity of the animal

17
Q

If a supplier in a supply chain gives the manufacturer instructions that are not followed, can the supplier be successfully sued as a strict liability claim?

A

No

18
Q

What do you need for punitive damages?

A

Willful and wanton conduct

19
Q

Does the scope of consent matter?

A

Yes

20
Q

What is the default of multiple tortfeasor fault?

A

Pure comparative fault

21
Q

For nied must the party be present at the scene of whatever was upsetting?

A

Yes

22
Q

If a child reads a warning but does not appreciate it, does attractive nuisance still apply?

A

Yes

23
Q

Does assumption of the risk fold into comparative negligence?

A

Yes

24
Q

Collateral source rule

A

you can’t bring in the existence of reimbursement for the plaintiff from other sources

25
Q

Is assumption of the risk a defense to a strict liability claim?

A

Yes