topic summaries Flashcards
Agency - ALTER EGO
The agent assumes the legal identity of the principal. Acts as their hand.
Agency - EXPLICIT V IMPLICATION
Agency can be created explicitly or through implication.
No requirement of writing under the RoW 1995. Written document of confirmation must be created if either party requests it
Agency - TYPES
1) Agent discloses existence and name of principal
2) Agent only discloses existence
3) Agent does not disclose existence of a principal
Liability of agent/principal depends on whose credit was relied upon by the third party, when entering the contract. Therefore, agent can assume liability in types 2 and 3.
Agency - IMPLIED AUTHORITY
Agents cannot breach their delegated authority. If they do, their actions are not binding on the principal
Implied authority where…
- necessary to complete given task
- usual in circumstance
Agency - RATIFICATION
d = principal gives retrospective effect to ultra vires actions of agent
Requirements:
- principal existed at time of agent action
- principal had capacity
- there was an assumption of agency in the interaction
- informed decision
Agency - APPARENT AUTHORITY
d = principal represents agent to be properly authorised when they are not. Actions can still be binding on principal.
Does not create binding obligation, but prevents principal from saying agency did not exist
Requirements:
- principal’s conduct or words created impression of agency
- third party believed agency existed
- third party suffered resultant loss
Agency - AGENT’S DUTIES
General:
- skill and care
- follow instruction
- keep accounts
Fiduciary:
- don’t make secret profit
- confidentiality
- disclosure
- don’t enter agreements that detriment principal, but benefit agent
Agency - PRINCIPAL’S DUTIES
reimburse agent for costs incurred
relieve agent of liabilities incurred
remuneration
commercial agents - providing necessary documents and information to the agent
Agency - TERMINATION
Terminates upon…
- death of either
- end of stipulated period
- unilateral revocation
- purpose of contract achieved
(commercial agents must give 1 months notice for 1 year contract, 2 for 2, and 3 for 3+)
Partnership - DEFINITION
two or more individuals carrying on business together with a view for a profit
Partnership Act 1890
Partnership - SEPARATE LEGAL PERSONALITY
Scottish partnerships are their own legality entity. Can sue and be sued, enter into contracts, etc.
English don’t have separate legal personality
Not limited liability, however
Partnership - CONTINUITY
If a partner leaves for whatever reason, a new firm is created. Does not retain liabilities of the old firm.
Unless, same assets, stock and business of old firm
Partners retain liabilities incurred while at the firm
Partnership - PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT + 1890 RULES
Partnership agreement regulates firm interaction
Where agreement is silent or does not exist, s.19-31 of 1890 Act provides regulations:
- duty not to make a secret profit
- duty to account
- duty not to compete within the firm
- requirement of majority partner vote when expelling another
Partnership - DISSOLUTION
occurs due to…
- change in partnership for any reason
- frustration
- expiry of term contained in partnership agreement
Partnership - LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS
Limited Partnerships Act 1907
- general (standard partner) and limited (more like shareholders, don’t actual run firm, limited liability) partners
- need 1 of both
- need LP at end of name
- incorporated through registration at Companies House
Partnership - LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIPS
Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000
- more like a registered company
- LLP at end of name
- features member instead of partners
Companies - DEFINITION
legal personality
owned by members, run by directors
limited liability
Companies - CORPORATE VEIL
Salomon v Salomon - metaphorical barrier between personal and company assets, only latter can be chased by creditors when dealing with the company
Veil can be pierced by statute and common law.
Statute:
- insolvency
- lack of trading certificate
- knowingly receiving unlawful distribution of profits
- inaccurate information on company prospectus
common law - Prest v Petrodel Resources - where individual tries to use corporate veil to avoid personal liabilities
Companies - PUBLIC v PRIVATE
Public
- properly qualified secretary
- minimum 2 directors (1 of whom is natural)
- minimum shared capital of £50,000
Private - much looser as no requirement of public interest/concern. Need at least 1 natural director
Companies - INCORPORATION
Complete memorandum of association - largely irrelevant these days
Articles of Association (IN01 form)
Publish articles at companies house
Can only change articles by means of special resolution
Companies - MEETINGS
AGM - everyone, annually
EGM - any meeting with everyone that isn’t AGM
Class - certain class of shareholder
Board - only directors need to be present
Companies - WINDING UP
Company assets liquidated by liquidator
Liquidator appointed by court
Assets distributed to ranked creditors
Methods:
- voluntary by members
- voluntary by creditors
- court-ordered
Directors - ROLE + REQUIREMENTS
Role:
- make company decisions
- direct administrative matters
- Governing mind of company
Every company needs 1
Appointed by company or law
Paid
Directors - EXCLUSIONS
- expressly prohibited by company constitution
- under 16s
- sequestrated individuals
- company auditor
- disqualified individuals
Directors - TERMINATION
death, stipulated period passed, winding up
Disqualification:
- only court can disqualify
- people can petition court for disqualification
Grounds:
- indictable offence regarding management of company
- fraud
- failure to make proper returns of company documents
- persistent breach of company legislation
Directors - DUTIES
s.171-177 Companies Act 2006
- act within delegate power
- promote company success
- exercise reasonable skill, care and diligence
- don’t accept benefits from third parties
- avoid conflicts of interest
Directors - REMEDIES FOR BREACH
o Reimbursement for company loss
o Repayment of company expenses
o Payment of lost profit
o Asset return
o Dismissal
o Interdict
Shareholders - FOSS V HARBOTTLE
Majority rule - need majority of shareholders tot take action against directors. Court should not interfere with majority consensus
Proper plaintiff - only the company can sue for wrongs done against it
Shareholders - EDWARDS V HALLIWELL
Exceptions to Foss, where minority shareholders can take action:
- ultra vires transactions
- failure to follow proper procedure
- infringement of personal rights of members
- fraud by majority