Topic 8 - Globalisation, Green Crime, and State Crime Flashcards
Globalisation
- HELD
- The widening, deepening, and speeding up of worldwide inter connectedness in all aspects of life, cultural to the criminal, the financial to the spiritual
Causes of globalisation
- Spread of ICT
- Influence of global mass media
- Cheap air travel
- Deregulation of financial markets and opening up competition
- Easier movement so businesses can easily relocate
The global criminal economy
- HELD = globalisation of crime which is the interconnectedness of crime against national borders (transnational organised crime)
- CASTELLS crime operates on the same basis as any legitimate business e.g., cyber crime, money laundering, and trafficking in body parts
- Supply and demand with demand from rich western countries
Transnational corporations
- Switch their manufacturing to low wage countries
- Produces job insecurities
- Unemployment
- Poverty
Marketisation
- Led to individual consumers which has undermined social cohesion - less concerned with outlook of others
- Increasing materialistic culture promoted by the global media portrayed success in terms of lifestyle consumption (LEFT REALISTS)
- Leads poorer people to turn to crime e.g., LA de-industrialisation has led to drug gangs increasing
Criminal opportunities
- Globalisation has created criminal opportunities for more elite groups in society who manipulate the deregulation of financial markets = movement of money around the globe = avoid paying tax
- Enables criminal organisations to launder money easily through overseas banks and businesses
- Led to new patterns of opportunity
- Recruiting flexible workers has allowed for illegal workers to be recruited (breaches of health and safety and paid below minimum wage )
A03 Patterns in crime
- Does not adequately explain how the changes make people turn to crime e.g., not all poor people commit crime
Crimes of globalisation
- ROTHE and FRIEDRICHS = International Monetary Fund and World Bank
- These organisations are dominated by major capitalist states such as the USA
- RWANDA = caused unemployment in the 1980s and created an economic base for the 1994 genocide
- CAIN = cause widespread both directly and indirectly
Patterns of criminal organisations
- HOBBS and DUNNIGHAM argues crime is a ‘glocal’ system which involves networks of both legitimate and illegitimate opportunity structures across the globe
- Crime involves individuals with contacts acting as a ‘hub’ around by a loose network forms
- The changes associated with globalisation have led to a move away from the old hierarchal gang structure to loose networks
Drug trafficking
- Locally based with global connections
1 Zone of production = Asia and South America
2 Zone of distribution = Africa and the Eastern world
3 Zone of consumption - Western world
A03 HOBBS and DUNNINGHAM
- It is not clear that these patterns are new or that the old structure has disappeared
- It may be that they both co-exist and always have done
- This is symbolic of post-modernism = crime becomes a highly non-generalisable concept
McMafia
- GLENNY = organisations that emerged in Russia and Eastern Europe after the fall of communism and refers to transnational organised crime
Russian mafia
- The state regulated the price of everything = when communism collapsed the government deregulated most sectors of their economy (except from oil)
- Bought oil pipelines and sold for a profit - new capitalist class = OLIGARCHS
- Russian mafia used as protection rackets and made violent threats
Global risk consciousness
- Knowledge about risk comes from the media = distort the dangers we Dave and as a result cause moral panics
Green crime
- Crimes against the environment
- The planet is a single-ecosystem and harming one place of the world effects another e.g., pollution in one country can turn into acid rain in another
Global risk society and the environment
- BECK argues in late modernity we can now provide adequate resources for all
- Created ‘manufactured risks’ (dangers we have never failed before)
e.g., Mozambique 2010 - global warming caused hottest heatwave in 100 years = wildfires = 30% cost increase in bread = increase in crime
Traditional criminologists
- SITU and EMMONS ‘an unauthorised act or omission that violates the law’
- Focuses on the patterns and causes of law breaking
- Clearly defined subject
A03 Traditional criminologists
- Accepting the official definitions of environmental problems and crimes which are often shaped by powerful groups
- Subjective
Green criminology
- Takes a radical approach starting from the notion of harm rather harm criminal law
- WHITE argues the attention of criminology should be any action that harms the physical environment and or human or non-human animals with it, even if the law has not been broken
- A from of transgressive criminology = oversteps the boundaries of traditional criminology to include new issues = zemiology (the study of harms)
- Similar to Marxism = crimes of the powerful
Types of harm
- WHITE
1 Anthropocentric harm - human centred view of environmental harm, generally adopted by nation states and transnational corporations who assume humans have the right to dominate the natural environment - it puts economic growth before environmental harm
2 Ecocentric harm - sees humans and their environment as inter-dependent and that environmental harm hurts humans as well - green criminologists adopt this view
Types of green crime
- SOUTH (primary crimes)
1 Crimes of air pollution
2 Crimes of deforestation
3 Crimes of species decline and animal rights
4 Crimes of water pollution
Crimes of air pollution
- Burning fossil fuels from industry and transport adds 6 million tons of carbon to the atmosphere every year
Crimes of deforestation
- In the Amazon, forest has been cleared to rear beef cattle for export
Crimes of species decline and animal rights
- Crimes such as dog-fighting are increasing
Crimes of water pollution
- Criminals include businesses that dump toxic waste and governments who discharge untreated sewage into rivers and seas
Secondary crime
- SOUTH rose that arise out of the flouting if the rules aimed at preventing or regulating emotional disasters
1 State violence against oppositional groups
2 Hazardous waste and organised crime
State violence against oppositional groups
- States have been known to resort to illegal methods to deal with environmental protestors
- 1985: French secret service blew up Greenpeace ship and killed a crew member
Hazardous waste and organised crime
- Disposal of chemical and nuclear waste is highly profitable
- Eco-mafias profit from dumping toxic waste illegally at sea
- WALTERS “the ocean floor has been a radioactive rubbish dump for decades”
- Waste dumping = globalised character
Environmental discrimination
- SOUTH
- When it comes to poorer groups being worse affected by pollution
A03 Green criminology
- Strengths: it recognises the growing importance of environmental issues and the need to address harms and risks to both humans and non-humans
- Weaknesses: because it focuses on the broader concept of harm rather than legal it becomes very difficult to define. Critics also argue that it is a matter of values and these cannot be established objectively
State crime
- GREEN and WARD “Illegal or deviant activities perpetrated by, or with the compliancy, of state agencies”
What forms do state crimes take
- Genocide
- War crimes
- Torture
- Imprisonment without trial
- Assassination
Four categories of state crime
McGLAUGHLIN
1. Political crimes
2. Crimes by the police or security forces
3. Economic crimes
4. Social and cultural norms
The scale of state crime
- The power of the state means it can commit crimes on a vast scale with widespread victimisation
- GREEN and WARD estimate 262 million people have been murdered by governments in the 20th century
- MICHALOWSKI and KRAMER “the great power and great crimes are inseparable”
The state is the source of law
- The role of the state is to define what is criminal and to manage the criminal justice system
- The power it holds means it can avoid having its own actions defined as criminal
- “Principle of national sovereignty” means states have supreme authority within their own boundaries which makes it difficult for the UN and other bodies for indefinite periods of time
Genocide in Rwanda
- Genocide “acts committed with intent to destroy any group”
- 1994 Rwanda: (Tutsis - 800,000 killed over 100 days - rats and cockroaches) and Hutus
State/corporate crime - Challenger space shuttle disaster
- Risky, negligent, and cost cutting decisions by state agency NASA = 7 killed astronauts 73 seconds after blast off
War crimes
- Invasion of Iraq in 2003
Domestic law (defining state crime)
- CHAMBLISS “acts defined by law as criminal and committed by state officials in pursuit of their jobs representatives of the state”
A03 Domestic law
- Subjective as states have the power to make and enforce their own laws
Social harms and zemiology (defining state crime)
- MICHALOWSKI “not just illegal but legally permissible acts whose consequences are similar to those of illegal acts” in terms of harm
- Zemiology = the study of harms
A03 Social harms and zemiology
- The issue of harm can be vague, who decides what counts as harm?
Labelling and societal reaction (defining state crime)
- A criminal act depends on whether the social audience sees it as a crime or not
- Crimes are socially constructed
A03 Labelling and societal reaction
- Vague
- Unclear
- Ignores other factors such as the media
International laws (defining state crime)
- ROTHE and MULLINS “any action by or on behalf of a state that violates international law/or a state’s own domestic law”
A03 International law
- Defined by those in power and is therefore a social construct
- Focuses on war crimes/crimes against humanity rather than state crimes such as corruption
Human rights
1 Natural rights - right to live, free speech etc
2 Civil rights - right to vote, privacy etc
Crime as the violation of human rights
- SCHWENDINGER argues we should define crime in terms of violation of human rights rather than the breaking of legal rules
- The role of the sociologist should be to defend human rights (transgressive criminology)
A03 SCHWENDINGER
- COHEN = little argument to what constitutes a human right e.g., torture, genocide etc
The social conditions of state crime
- An authoritarian personality
- Crimes of obedience
An authoritarian personality (social conditions of state crime)
- ADORNO ET AL someone who is willing to obey orders without question
- Individuals commit the actions they are socialised into and takes place in conditions where such behaviour becomes acceptable/required
Crimes of obedience (social conditions of state crime)
KELMAN and HAMILTON studied 400 civilians by a platoon of American soldiers and found 3 key features the produce crimes:
1. Authorisation
2. Routinisation
3. Dehumanisation
BAUMAN = features of modernity are essential to enabling the state to commit crimes - dehumanise victims and turn mass murder into routine activity
A03 Social conditions of state crime
- Not all genocide occurs through highly organised divisions of labour, e.g., Rwandan genocide conducted by large marauding groups
- Ideological factors are also important in the role of state crimes, e.g., Nazi ideology stressed a single German racial identity
State crime and the culture of denial
COHEN
1. The growing impact of human rights movement
2. The increased focus in criminology Upton victims
- Spiral of denial
- Neutralisation theory
- Denial of the victim
- Denial of injury
- Denial of responsibility
- Condemning the condemners
- Appeal to higher loyalty
Spiral of denial
- Flatly deny human rights and COHEN identified 3 stages:
1. It didn’t happen
2. If it did happen it’s not what it seems
3. It is justified
Neutralisation theory
- Examination of the way that states will deny or justify their crimes, using the same technique when justifying torture/massacre etc
Denial of the victim
- “They exaggerate; they are terrorists, look at what they do to each other”
Denial of injury
- “We are the real victims not them”
Denial of responsibility
- “I was only obeying my orders” (death camp guards)
Condemning the condemners
- “Everyone is picking on us” (anti-semitism)
Appeal to higher loyalty
- Self-righteous justification “it’s a free world”