Topic 7 Flashcards

1
Q

Criminal law

A
  • concerned with public wrongs
  • define what society regards as intolerable deviance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Criminal law functions

A
  • deter deviant behaviour, express reprehensible behaviours maintain they social order bring accountability rehabilitation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

A society criminal law says a lot

A
  • society’s criminal law says a lot about the society itself
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Public law

A
  • an area of law concerned with the public intestate. And that regulates collective interests
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

3 categories of crime

A
  1. Offences against persons
  2. Offences against property
  3. Offences deemed wrong in and of themselves
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

criminal law is amongst the most widely debated type of law (True or false)

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Debates on criminal law

A
  • what constitutes a crime
  • the appropriateness of (punitive) criminal law for behaviours
  • the effectiveness of criminal law
  • negative social outcomes of particular laws
  • debates on the operations of law ( too lenient vs too harsh; too intrusive vs not intrusive enough)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Simultaneous principle

A

Crime requires the simultaneous coincidence of acts reus and mens rea

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Actus reus

A
  • an evil (wrongful) act
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Mens rea

A
  • an evil (wrongful) mind (intention)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

2 method for assessing mens rea/intent

A
  1. Objective intention
  2. Subjective intention
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Section 21 of criminal code

A
  • mens rea concerning parties to an offence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Strict liability offences

A
  • onus falls on the accused to prove they had no intent, limited to minor offences, highway offences, speeding
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Absolute liability offences

A
  • where intent is irrelevant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Culpable homicide

A

When someone either intentionally or unintentionally commits murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Criminal negligence

A
  • negligence showing disregard for the lives and safety of others
17
Q

R V Cooper

A

Newfoundland second degree murder of ex wife, blacked out while strangling the victim, intent started before he killed her, he did intend to cause her bodily harm, he did intially attempted to kill her, once the accused formed the intent to cause her bodily harm it doesnt matter if the intent persists through the entiriety of the act, mens rea does not need to be present the whole time

18
Q

R V Hundal

A

supreme court case with subjective/objective standard, runs a yellow light with a illegally heavy load, rainy day,

19
Q

Defences to and mitigations of criminal offences

A
  • capacity
  • self defence: section 34 of the criminal code;R V Lavallee, struggling with mental illness and in a abusive relationship she took the life of her ex where she acted in reaction to her partner about to kill her no penalty was imposed
  • intoxication; Daviault V R (1994); 60 year old bought brandy woke up and SAed someone, intoxicated didn’t change liability
  • Enticement by police
  • forced to commit a crime
  • mistake of fact
  • acting under duress: Person who commits an offence under coercion not voluntary under threat of force and person making threat present when offence committed, threat must be immediate, person threatened not part of the plotting of the crime and must be confident that these crimes would be carried out high standard for crime of duress
20
Q

what cases associated with mistake of fact a defence to criminal offences

A
  • R V Pappajohn Vancouver real estate agent met with a client and considerable alcohol consumed and engaged in sexual activity and at the beginning there wasn’t consent then both engaged and at the end she ran out naked crying for help, he made a mistake of fact that he thought she consented Pappajohn influenced changes the notion consent in law no consent if someone consents for you, if they are incapable
    to consent and if you misuse your authority/trust to make them consent, no, or pushing someone away
  • R V Ewanchuk; Ewanchuk brought a minor to his trailer she had an initial consent but then gave her massage and she told him to stop a few times and it was seen as implied consent, she said stop at one point it should’ve all stopped, continuation of the act despite continued lack of consent SA case,
  • R V Hutchinson: Hutchinson poked holes in condom without telling his partner and she got pregnant and this was seen as SA anything that was not consented during sexual activity is sexual assault
21
Q

Criminal code of conduct defines

A

• The Criminal Code of Canada: defines criminal
offences, establishes the kind and degree of
punishment for certain offences, outlines
procedures for investigation and prosecution,
outlines rules regarding helping/encouraging
crimes and sets out some defenses

22
Q

Criminal code made into law in and T or F there are statutory law based crimes outside the criminal code

A

1982
True

23
Q

What are the offences included in criminal code

A

• Offences include: offences against a person,
offences against property, offences against the
administration of law, sexual offences, terrorism
offences and hate propaganda offences

24
Q

The Criminal Code sets out 3 categories of criminal
offences:

A

i) summary offences, ii) indictable offences
and iii) hybrid offences

25
Q

What is attempted to be accomplished with criminal law

A

• Attempts to accomplish a range of purposes:
-general deterrence
-specific deterrence
-societal denunciation
-accountability
-keeping society safe
-rehabilitation

26
Q

Important factors for consideration in criminal law and sentencing

A

i) degree of
premeditation, ii) surrounding circumstances, iii) gravity
of the crime, iv) attitude of the offender, v) criminal
record of the offender, vi) age/personality of the
offender, vii) any mitigating circumstances,
viii) previously imposed sentences and x) mercy