Topic 5 Tariffs + FiTs Flashcards

1
Q

Tariffs and Electricity Prices - Retail Tariffs

A
  • Standing Offer: mainly archaic from pre-privatisation phase (comply with specific laws)
  • Market Offer: usually include discounts (also comply with specific laws)
  • Both deregulated (NSW, VIC, SA) and regulated (everywhere else)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Tariffs and Electricity Prices - Components of electricity bill

A
  • Wholesale: spot market costs (purchase, hedging contracts, FCAS etc.)
  • Network: dist and trans costs (based on regulated return on asset base (RAB))
  • Retail: retailing and marketing costs (managing risk, business overheads etc.)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Tariffs and Electricity Prices - Tariff Objectives (theoretical)

A
  • Recover cost of supply elec efficiently and equitably (conflict between 2)
  • Provide price signal to incentivise efficient demand-side behaviour in short-term (use) and long-term (investment)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

FiTs and Metering Schemes

A

Sets a fixed price over over a stated period for electricity export (and usually guarantees grid access to RE generators). Aims to encourage deployment by bridging price gap

  • Metering: gross (all export) and net
  • Challenges
    • Setting correct price (tech price can change quicker than expected eg NSW)
    • Boom-bust cycle
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

FiTs and Metering Schemes - Design considerations

A
  • Net or gross FiT
  • Fixed premium (on top of elec rate) or fixed price
  • Capped or uncapped - no cap better
  • Who pays (retailer, NSP or gov)
  • Regional price variation to support tech deployment where needed
  • Stepped FiT (reduced over time) - very important
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

FIT: Pros and Cons

A

Pros:

  • Provides market signal based on output/generation (rewards efficiency)
  • Flexible (depending on uptake and cost)
  • Encourages steady growth and certainty (when well designed)
  • Can target specific technologies and locations
  • Low transactions costs (good for small scale)

Cons:

  • Costly
  • Can disincentivise innovation (as price is fixed)
  • Hard to represent temporal and locational value of electricity accurately
  • Can have distributional/equity issues
  • Can increase network barriers to RE (no incentive for networks)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

FIT - Good Design

A
  • Flexible stepped tariffs, uncapped
  • Differentiated tariffs for diff techs and resource areas
  • Need for complementary policies (standards and grid access)
  • Optimal/correct price to attract investment but not overly costly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Tariff Cross-Subsidies

A

Households with PV receive a greater saving on the network component of their bills than the value of the PV provided to the network, hence households without PV are forced to pay (cross-subsidise) for them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Tariff Cross-Subsidies - Value of PV to network (see DE topic)

A
  • Reduce long-term network investment/augmentation
  • Voltage and reactive power support possible
  • Improve resilience
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Tariff Cross-Subsidies -Cost of PV on network

A
  • Managing a wider range of voltages
  • Related issues of potential reverse power flow, flicker, phase imbalance
  • Protection complexity
  • Residual harmonics and power factor caused by loads
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Tariff Cross-Subsidies - Locational and Temporal Aspects

A
  • Large variations between different substation, feeder and customer load profiles
  • Subsidisation to regional consumers and consumers using large loads (eg aircon) during peak times
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Cost Reflective Network Tariffs - Network Tariffs

A

Challenges

  • Overspending/gold plating by networks in capacity (sunk costs)
  • Price signals are not efficient

Components/Costs

  • Fixed (daily charge)
  • Variable (volumetric charge) - very small
  • Marginal (peak demand charge) - to meet an incremental increase in demand
  • Sunk (how to recover?) - already incurred and not recoverable

Tariff design principles
- Efficient, equitable, simple, stable, recovery revenue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Cost Reflective Network Tariffs - Cost-Reflective Tariffs (CRT)

A
  • Encourage efficient use of the network assets

- Provide an efficient price signal for network investment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Cost Reflective Network Tariffs - Metering Technology

A

Accumulation meter - measures cumulative energy through it only
Interval meter - measures how much energy flows per interval and data can be downloaded
Smart meter - collects time stamped data on multiple channels and can communicate/interface in real time with utility, customer and individual appliances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Cost Reflective Network Tariffs - Challenges

A
  • Aus CRTs are levied on consumer peak not on network peak
  • Fixed prices increasing (inefficient price signal)
  • Demand charge windows too wide
  • Retailers don’t have to pass on CRTs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly