✅ Topic 5: Intelligence & Motivation on Health & Wellbeing Flashcards
What is intelligence (Mental ability) and IQ?
- A latent construct defined as: the general ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, learn quickly, and learn from environment
- Misunderstood phrase “what intelligence tests measure” (Boring) -> show that we can attempt to measure intelligence
- Intelligent Quotient (IQ): measure of deviation of mental age from chronological age:
- IQ = (mental age/chronological age) x 100
- Redefined as a standardised score showing deviation from average score of 100.
- Scores normally distributed with an SD of 15.
What are some ways to measure intelligence? What is meant by G intelligence?
- Digit span: repeat each string of numbers in the order that I say it, which the string gets longer after each repeat -> Example: 8-4-9-2
- Letter number sequence: rearrange these items so say numbers then letter, in ascending orders -> Example: 74GR -> 47GR
- Explaining proverb meaning (abstract thinking)
- Trail making: join circles in numerical orders
- Deduct unknown shape from pattern
=> (G)eneral intelligence: the common ‘mental energy’ underlying performance on all tests (different tests give the same results in IQ)
What is the relationship between Intelligence and Health?
- Context: IQ correlates with academic achievement, job performance, and longevity.
- Cognitive epidemiology: the examination of cognition/IQ as a correlate of health and mortality
- Longitudinal designs help to establish causality
- Gather information about health behaviours - Issues:
- Reverse causation: poor health -> lower IQ
- Confounding effects - e.g. SES: affect both health and IQ (problem)
What is the Hierarchy of G intelligence? Explain each of the domain and its task level?
- Verbal ability:
- Vocab reading
- Synonyms - Working memory:
- Digit span
- Letter-number sequencing - Visual-spatial reasoning:
- Boxfolding (3D folding of 2D box)
- Hidden figures (hidden object in images) - Processing speed:
- Reaction time
- Trail-making
=> general intelligence: studied as ind. diff
=> 4 broad domains: studied by cogpsychology
=> No consensus on precise hierarchical structure/content
Describe a longitudinal study of IQ? (Hint: Scottish)
- Example study: Scottish Birth Cohort Studies
- Children cohorts born in 1921 and 1936 took the same standardised mental test.
- Samples were traced and recruited in cohort studies - The Moray House Test (mental test):
- Contains 71 items e.g. arithmetic, following directions, proverbs, analogies, reasonings, etc.
- Scores correlate with recent mental tests, such as the Raven’s Matrices and Stanford-Binet.
- Valid measure of 10/11 IQ. - Methodology:
- Compared childhood IQ of survivors vs. non-survivors
- SES estimated by ‘overcrowding’ in childhood and father’s occupation.
- Longitudinal design helps establish causality - Results:
- Survivors have significantly higher childhood IQs
- Smaller effect in men compared to women.
- Clear consistent pattern for women, but many overlaps for men (WWII confounds)
=> Similar 9 studies: higher IQ in first 20-yrs is linked with lower mortality, after adjusting for childhood SES.
=> Stronger predictor of mortality than BMI, cholesterol, blood pressure; and at a similar level to smoking.
What is the causal mechanism of IQ-Health?
Contribution of each mechanism may vary by cause of death.
- Education: IQ -> better education -> better job -> higher adult SES status
=> Adjusting for adult SES reduces IQ-longevity association. - Health: IQ -> better health literacy & behaviours -> longevity
- Medication adherence
- Healthy eating and physical activity
- Wearing seatbelts (safety measure)
- Hangover frequency (lower binge-drinking) - Correlational: sub-optimal neural development -> lower IQ & higher psychiatric burden
- Low IQ associated with psychiatric disorders
- But controlling for birth weight does not eliminate IQ-longevity links - Somatic: body integrity (e.g. good genes & body functioning) -> IQ and health problems
=> Bodily symmetry associated with IQ, which is seen as indicator of good health
What is the link between intelligence and happiness?
- Example study: Ali et al.
- Mixed results from previous studies
- Asked Ps to complete: (1) happiness questionnaire + (2) verbal IQ measured with National Adult Reading Test (NART)
- Measure mediating variables that may account for IQ-happiness links.
=> High IQ predicted likelihood of being happy - IQ-Happiness Relationship mediated by:
- Dependency in daily functioning
- Income (SES)
- Neurotic symptoms
- Self-reported health
- Marital health (married -> happier)
- Social participation
=> However further studies needed to test mechanism longitudinally.
What is motivation? Why it is important to study?
- An internal state that:
- Energizes, direct, and lead behaviour towards the satisfaction of needs/drive
- If unsatisfied, feel physiological/psychological arousal (or both)
- Is dynamic rather than static - Why is it important to study?
- Ind. difference (state and trait differences)
- Linked with important life outcomes
- Relationship with personality is unclear (and debated)
What are the models of motivation?
- Murray: Need (+Press) -> Motive -> Behaviour
- Need: primary needs which are biological in nature (e.g. air, food, sex, pain avoidance)
- Press: situational conditions event (can increase or decrease motive’s strength)
- Motive: secondary/psychogenic needs which are derived from biology and/or psychological (e.g. nurturance and achievement)
=> Recent model changes include goals, to distinguish motivation from mood - What are secondary/psychogenic needs:
- Murray identified 20 psychogenic needs (+7 provisional needs)
- Most research now focuses on 3 secondary needs: achievement, affiliation, power.
Describe McClelland’s Acquired Needs Theory and explain its sub-components
- Theory proposes 3 basic needs:
- Achievement: desire to master skills, do things well, and accomplish goals etc.
- Affiliation: desire to form relationships and spend time with others.
- Power: desire to influence and control others
=> Needs can change with time and within individuals (trait difference) - How to measure:
- Thematic Apperception Test (TAT)
- Projective tests -> appropriate for motivation research (implicit nature of motives) - Identify sub-components (Hope and Fear):
- Achievement: Hope to success vs. Fear of failure
- Power: Hope of power vs. Fear of weakness - Subtypes of motive for needs of Affiliation:
- Emotional support
- Positive stimulation
- Attention from others
- Social comparison
How individual differences in need for achievement influence their behaviours?
- People high in this need have preference for:
- tasks of moderate difficulty, that indicate ability
- work settings with frequent feedback on current vs. previous performance - Correlations at individual-level:
- Entrepreneurial success and innovation
- Poor leadership and managerial skills -> find it difficult to delegate task (high autonomy) - Correlations at societal/historic-level:
- Economic growth and innovation
- Civil war and ineffective leadership - Supporting study: looking at societal level ‘need for achievement’ in England using content analysis of popular literatures
- Projections of author’s values, needs, motives
- Scored extracts of achievement imagery (inter-rater reliability of ~.96)
- Estimate economic activity through coal imports
=> Increasing need for achievement leads to subsequent increase economic growth
How individual differences in need for power influence their behaviours?
- Can reflect desire to influence and have impact, not necessarily just dominate and control
- expressed through generativity (nurture)
- attracted by jobs involving teaching
- having larger families & greater parental involvement (for females) - Correlations at individual-level:
- Higher testosterone levels
- Higher sexual activity and aggression
- Managerial, leadership and career success - Correlations at societal/historic-level:
- Increase in wars and arms
- Effective leadership - Supporting study: explore links between high need for power and presidential performance (PP)?
- Motives estimated from previous coding of US Presidents’ speeches.
- ‘PP’ indicators measured by e.g. war entry, perceived ‘greatness’ & decision
=> Indicators predicted by high Need for Power (and lower Needs for Achievement and Affiliation)
=> Unlikely due to reverse causation, bias in coding motives or presidential performance
How individual differences in need for affiliation influence their behaviours?
- Correlations at individual-level:
- Like similar others, dislike dissimilar others - Correlations at societal/historic-level:
- Peace and disarmament
- Political scandal - Supporting study: importance of concessions to avoid/resolve conflicts
- Undergrad responses to letter relating to Cuban Missile Crisis (after instructions)
- Letters coded for concessions and needs
=> Need for Affiliation positively related to concessions, vice versa for Need for Power
What is the physiology of Need for Power?
- Model: High testosterone = High Need for Power -> Engagement in Power-challenge situations -> Activation of Stress Response (Sympathetic NS)
- Symptoms include: increased heart rate, muscle tension and inhibit immune system - Study -133 male prison inmates participated were measured:
- The need for power and affiliation using TAT
- No. of stressors experienced
- No. and severity of illnesses in the past 12 months
- Saliva sample to measure salivary immuno-globulin-A (S-IgA) -> immune functioning - Results: Those with High need for power experienced worse illness severity at high stress and has worse immune functioning (lower level of S-IgA concentration)
=> ‘Stressed power motive’ associated with poorer health”
=> High need for power itself is “not a general vulnerability for impaired health”
What is the physiology of Need for Affiliation?
- Associated with parasympathetic NS, symptoms include: conserve energy, promotes functions (e.g. digestive and immune system) => Generally positive effects on health
- Study: 132 students were measured:
- The need for affiliation (TAT) BEFORE and AFTER watching one of two short films.
- Need for affiliation group (Mother Theresa) primed further in post-film writing task about love and caring.
- Saliva sample to measure S-IgA before and after films
- Measured illness experienced that year. - Results: Evidence for protective effects of need for affiliation, and no overall change in need for power.
=> BUT, sub-group with inhibited power motive syndrome (high power, low affiliation) did show reduction in S-IgA after WWII film.
=> No link between reactive increase in S-IgA and illness history (just a normal response)