✅ Topic 5: Intelligence & Motivation on Health & Wellbeing Flashcards

1
Q

What is intelligence (Mental ability) and IQ?

A
  1. A latent construct defined as: the general ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, learn quickly, and learn from environment
  2. Misunderstood phrase “what intelligence tests measure” (Boring) -> show that we can attempt to measure intelligence
  3. Intelligent Quotient (IQ): measure of deviation of mental age from chronological age:
    - IQ = (mental age/chronological age) x 100
    - Redefined as a standardised score showing deviation from average score of 100.
    - Scores normally distributed with an SD of 15.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are some ways to measure intelligence? What is meant by G intelligence?

A
  1. Digit span: repeat each string of numbers in the order that I say it, which the string gets longer after each repeat -> Example: 8-4-9-2
  2. Letter number sequence: rearrange these items so say numbers then letter, in ascending orders -> Example: 74GR -> 47GR
  3. Explaining proverb meaning (abstract thinking)
  4. Trail making: join circles in numerical orders
  5. Deduct unknown shape from pattern

=> (G)eneral intelligence: the common ‘mental energy’ underlying performance on all tests (different tests give the same results in IQ)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the relationship between Intelligence and Health?

A
  1. Context: IQ correlates with academic achievement, job performance, and longevity.
  2. Cognitive epidemiology: the examination of cognition/IQ as a correlate of health and mortality
    - Longitudinal designs help to establish causality
    - Gather information about health behaviours
  3. Issues:
    - Reverse causation: poor health -> lower IQ
    - Confounding effects - e.g. SES: affect both health and IQ (problem)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the Hierarchy of G intelligence? Explain each of the domain and its task level?

A
  1. Verbal ability:
    - Vocab reading
    - Synonyms
  2. Working memory:
    - Digit span
    - Letter-number sequencing
  3. Visual-spatial reasoning:
    - Boxfolding (3D folding of 2D box)
    - Hidden figures (hidden object in images)
  4. Processing speed:
    - Reaction time
    - Trail-making

=> general intelligence: studied as ind. diff
=> 4 broad domains: studied by cogpsychology
=> No consensus on precise hierarchical structure/content

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Describe a longitudinal study of IQ? (Hint: Scottish)

A
  1. Example study: Scottish Birth Cohort Studies
    - Children cohorts born in 1921 and 1936 took the same standardised mental test.
    - Samples were traced and recruited in cohort studies
  2. The Moray House Test (mental test):
    - Contains 71 items e.g. arithmetic, following directions, proverbs, analogies, reasonings, etc.
    - Scores correlate with recent mental tests, such as the Raven’s Matrices and Stanford-Binet.
    - Valid measure of 10/11 IQ.
  3. Methodology:
    - Compared childhood IQ of survivors vs. non-survivors
    - SES estimated by ‘overcrowding’ in childhood and father’s occupation.
    - Longitudinal design helps establish causality
  4. Results:
    - Survivors have significantly higher childhood IQs
    - Smaller effect in men compared to women.
    - Clear consistent pattern for women, but many overlaps for men (WWII confounds)
    => Similar 9 studies: higher IQ in first 20-yrs is linked with lower mortality, after adjusting for childhood SES.
    => Stronger predictor of mortality than BMI, cholesterol, blood pressure; and at a similar level to smoking.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the causal mechanism of IQ-Health?

A

Contribution of each mechanism may vary by cause of death.

  1. Education: IQ -> better education -> better job -> higher adult SES status
    => Adjusting for adult SES reduces IQ-longevity association.
  2. Health: IQ -> better health literacy & behaviours -> longevity
    - Medication adherence
    - Healthy eating and physical activity
    - Wearing seatbelts (safety measure)
    - Hangover frequency (lower binge-drinking)
  3. Correlational: sub-optimal neural development -> lower IQ & higher psychiatric burden
    - Low IQ associated with psychiatric disorders
    - But controlling for birth weight does not eliminate IQ-longevity links
  4. Somatic: body integrity (e.g. good genes & body functioning) -> IQ and health problems
    => Bodily symmetry associated with IQ, which is seen as indicator of good health
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the link between intelligence and happiness?

A
  1. Example study: Ali et al.
    - Mixed results from previous studies
    - Asked Ps to complete: (1) happiness questionnaire + (2) verbal IQ measured with National Adult Reading Test (NART)
    - Measure mediating variables that may account for IQ-happiness links.
    => High IQ predicted likelihood of being happy
  2. IQ-Happiness Relationship mediated by:
    - Dependency in daily functioning
    - Income (SES)
    - Neurotic symptoms
    - Self-reported health
    - Marital health (married -> happier)
    - Social participation
    => However further studies needed to test mechanism longitudinally.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is motivation? Why it is important to study?

A
  1. An internal state that:
    - Energizes, direct, and lead behaviour towards the satisfaction of needs/drive
    - If unsatisfied, feel physiological/psychological arousal (or both)
    - Is dynamic rather than static
  2. Why is it important to study?
    - Ind. difference (state and trait differences)
    - Linked with important life outcomes
    - Relationship with personality is unclear (and debated)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the models of motivation?

A
  1. Murray: Need (+Press) -> Motive -> Behaviour
    - Need: primary needs which are biological in nature (e.g. air, food, sex, pain avoidance)
    - Press: situational conditions event (can increase or decrease motive’s strength)
    - Motive: secondary/psychogenic needs which are derived from biology and/or psychological (e.g. nurturance and achievement)
    => Recent model changes include goals, to distinguish motivation from mood
  2. What are secondary/psychogenic needs:
    - Murray identified 20 psychogenic needs (+7 provisional needs)
    - Most research now focuses on 3 secondary needs: achievement, affiliation, power.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe McClelland’s Acquired Needs Theory and explain its sub-components

A
  1. Theory proposes 3 basic needs:
    - Achievement: desire to master skills, do things well, and accomplish goals etc.
    - Affiliation: desire to form relationships and spend time with others.
    - Power: desire to influence and control others
    => Needs can change with time and within individuals (trait difference)
  2. How to measure:
    - Thematic Apperception Test (TAT)
    - Projective tests -> appropriate for motivation research (implicit nature of motives)
  3. Identify sub-components (Hope and Fear):
    - Achievement: Hope to success vs. Fear of failure
    - Power: Hope of power vs. Fear of weakness
  4. Subtypes of motive for needs of Affiliation:
    - Emotional support
    - Positive stimulation
    - Attention from others
    - Social comparison
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How individual differences in need for achievement influence their behaviours?

A
  1. People high in this need have preference for:
    - tasks of moderate difficulty, that indicate ability
    - work settings with frequent feedback on current vs. previous performance
  2. Correlations at individual-level:
    - Entrepreneurial success and innovation
    - Poor leadership and managerial skills -> find it difficult to delegate task (high autonomy)
  3. Correlations at societal/historic-level:
    - Economic growth and innovation
    - Civil war and ineffective leadership
  4. Supporting study: looking at societal level ‘need for achievement’ in England using content analysis of popular literatures
    - Projections of author’s values, needs, motives
    - Scored extracts of achievement imagery (inter-rater reliability of ~.96)
    - Estimate economic activity through coal imports
    => Increasing need for achievement leads to subsequent increase economic growth
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How individual differences in need for power influence their behaviours?

A
  1. Can reflect desire to influence and have impact, not necessarily just dominate and control
    - expressed through generativity (nurture)
    - attracted by jobs involving teaching
    - having larger families & greater parental involvement (for females)
  2. Correlations at individual-level:
    - Higher testosterone levels
    - Higher sexual activity and aggression
    - Managerial, leadership and career success
  3. Correlations at societal/historic-level:
    - Increase in wars and arms
    - Effective leadership
  4. Supporting study: explore links between high need for power and presidential performance (PP)?
    - Motives estimated from previous coding of US Presidents’ speeches.
    - ‘PP’ indicators measured by e.g. war entry, perceived ‘greatness’ & decision
    => Indicators predicted by high Need for Power (and lower Needs for Achievement and Affiliation)
    => Unlikely due to reverse causation, bias in coding motives or presidential performance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How individual differences in need for affiliation influence their behaviours?

A
  1. Correlations at individual-level:
    - Like similar others, dislike dissimilar others
  2. Correlations at societal/historic-level:
    - Peace and disarmament
    - Political scandal
  3. Supporting study: importance of concessions to avoid/resolve conflicts
    - Undergrad responses to letter relating to Cuban Missile Crisis (after instructions)
    - Letters coded for concessions and needs
    => Need for Affiliation positively related to concessions, vice versa for Need for Power
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the physiology of Need for Power?

A
  1. Model: High testosterone = High Need for Power -> Engagement in Power-challenge situations -> Activation of Stress Response (Sympathetic NS)
    - Symptoms include: increased heart rate, muscle tension and inhibit immune system
  2. Study -133 male prison inmates participated were measured:
    - The need for power and affiliation using TAT
    - No. of stressors experienced
    - No. and severity of illnesses in the past 12 months
    - Saliva sample to measure salivary immuno-globulin-A (S-IgA) -> immune functioning
  3. Results: Those with High need for power experienced worse illness severity at high stress and has worse immune functioning (lower level of S-IgA concentration)
    => ‘Stressed power motive’ associated with poorer health”
    => High need for power itself is “not a general vulnerability for impaired health”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the physiology of Need for Affiliation?

A
  1. Associated with parasympathetic NS, symptoms include: conserve energy, promotes functions (e.g. digestive and immune system) => Generally positive effects on health
  2. Study: 132 students were measured:
    - The need for affiliation (TAT) BEFORE and AFTER watching one of two short films.
    - Need for affiliation group (Mother Theresa) primed further in post-film writing task about love and caring.
    - Saliva sample to measure S-IgA before and after films
    - Measured illness experienced that year.
  3. Results: Evidence for protective effects of need for affiliation, and no overall change in need for power.
    => BUT, sub-group with inhibited power motive syndrome (high power, low affiliation) did show reduction in S-IgA after WWII film.
    => No link between reactive increase in S-IgA and illness history (just a normal response)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly