Topic 5 - Balancing Wants, Acquiring Knowledge, and Correcting Cognitive and Emotional Errors Flashcards
What are examples of quick and precise feedback on short-term outcomes?
a trader gets an instant alert showing profit or loss from a recent stock sale
an analyst reviewing the market’s instant reaction to a company’s morning earnings release
What are examples of delayed, sparse, and ambiguous long-term outcomes?
a portfolio manager reviewing the annual performance report of a diversified fund against its benchmark
an investment banker assesses the long term impact of a merger deal closed two years prior on the companies market share
What can get in the way of facts when evaluating whether financial advisors, money managers, or physicians are experts?
Self-interest gets in the way
surgeons might want to try a new technique so they will urge patients to opt for the surgery
How can financial advisors guide investors?
they can provide information on human behavior, financial facts, and correct cognitive and emotional errors
What would an example be of a financial advisor guiding investors’ actions?
point out emotional errors of exaggerated fear when clients are thinking of selling all of their stocks after a market crash
Is it true that from individual to individual we vary in vulnerability to cognitive and emotional errors?
This is true
Genetic factors do have some say in how vulnerable we are to cognitive and emotional errors (true or false)
true
What percent does research attribute to genetic factors with susceptibility to investment errors?
50%
What do people do when faced with multiple anchors?
They compare the anchors and evaluate which one is more plausible, then use that as their anchor for their answer
What is the “wisdom-of-crowds” method for correcting overprecision errors?
the average of two guesses is generally more accurate than either individual guess
What is “wisdom of crowds within”?
you ask someone for their best guess at something, then say assuming you are wrong… what is your next guess.
What is better, “wisdom of crowds within” or “wisdom of crowds”
wisdom of crowds is more accurate than wisdom of crowds within
The average guess of two people is generally more accurate than the average two guesses from one person
What is the rephrasing the question to make time more explicit method when correcting overprecision errors?
If someone asks you to estimate a confidence interval 12 months into the future…
Start by estimating the confidence interval one month into the future, then 6 months in the future, then 12 months into the future. This slow buildup helps people be more accurate as they will widen their confidence as they estimate further dates.
What is the splitting of the question into two parts method for correcting overprecision errors?
If someone is asking for a 20%, 50% and 80% confidence intervals, split the 20% and 50% into one group and the 80% into another.
Do the 20% and 50% confidence interval, then do the 80%, this will promote you to use system 2 and you should realize that you need to make the interval wider as you increase your confidence.
People with insufficient self-control are what?
overly eager to indulge
People with excessive self-control are what?
excessively reluctant to indulge
What is the daily settlement rule and what does it provide for investors?
It ensures that all traders close their positions at the end of each day.
This acts as a rule and self-control devices
What does the law of small numbers say when a firm has 6 years of beating the market?
we cannot predict nearly as accurately the future performance of a mutual fund by performance in 6 past years
we can predict quite accurately the quality of future meals at a restaurant by the quality of 6 past meals
What error are we making if we conclude that a manager who beat the benchmark 6 years in a row is evidence of skill?
Representativeness error
What is a correct evaluation of a manager who beats the benchmark for 6 years in a row?
We know that few mutal fund managrs beat their benchmarks consistently over the years
we know that flipping heads 6 times in 6 flips is only one in 64
we know that there are thousands of fund managers
it is likely that there would be a lucky fund manager who beats their benchmark 6 times in a row (just like the lucky 6 heads in a row from coin flips)
what is base rate information from the representativeness error?
The proportion of times that a similar situation happened to you, but it was worthwhile
How many telemarketers who have interrupted dinner have been worthwhile listening to?