Topic 4 - Psychopathology (complete!!!!) Flashcards
Explain statistical infrequency as a definition of abnormality
- Statistical infrequency = occurs when an individual has a lesson common characteristic in proportion to the population
- Those who are statistically infrequent are classed as abnormal
- According to the statistical definition, any common behaviour or characteristic within a population regarded as ‘normal’
- Any behaviour or characteristic that is uncommon (i.e. a very small proportion of the population has it) is regarded as ‘abnormal’
- Often used when we are dealing with characteristics that can be reliably measured e.g. IQ
- Majority of people’s scores will cluster around the mean, the further we go above or below this average the fewer will have that score - known as NORMAL DISTRIBUTION
- Produces a BELL SHAPED curve
- Mean IQ is 100 - most of the population (68%) have an IQ within this mean i.e. 85-115
- 94% of population have an IQ ranging from 70-130 (people who lie within this range = ‘normal’ as they have a characteristic common within the population)
- Only 2% of population have IQ above 130 and only another 2% of population have IQ below 70
- Those with IQ below 70 are very unusual (they have an uncommon characteristic when compared to the population) and so are ‘abnormal’ - often get diagnosis of ‘intellectual disability disorder’
Statistical infrequency as a definition of abnormality has real life application - state whether this is a strength or a weakness and explain why
STRENGTH
Used in clinical practice, both as part of formal diagnosis + as a way to assess the severity of a persons symptoms
E.g. diagnosis of intellectual disability disorder requires and IQ of below 70 (only 2% of population therefore statistically infrequent)
Also used in the BECK DEPRESSION INVENTORY (BDI) - a score of 30+ (top 5% of respondents) is widely interpreted as indicating severe depression
Statistical infrequency is a reliable quantitative measure for diagnosis - OBJECTIVE in it measurements as it considers the numerical infrequency rather than the SUBJECTIVE interpretation of a persons behaviours
Shows the REAL LIFE PRACTICAL VALUE of the statistical infrequency criterion in diagnostic and assessment processes
Statistical infrequency as a definition of abnormality does not consider that being infrequent in a population isn’t always regarded as ‘abnormal’ within a society - state whether this is a strength or a weakness and explain why
WEAKNESS
Infrequent characteristic can be positive as well as negative - i.e. being statistically infrequent doesn’t always lead to diagnosis
For every person with an IQ below 70 there is another with an IQ above 130 - yet we would not think of someone as abnormal for having a high IQ, in fact we would celebrate it
Similarly, we would not think of someone with a very low depression score on the BDI as abnormal, even if they are statistically infrequent
Therefore statistically infrequency cannot be the sole definition of abnormality as not all statistically infrequent people are regarded as abnormal
Means that, although statistical infrequency can form part of assessment and diagnostic procedures, it is never sufficient as the sole basis for defining abnormality
There is a debate on whether statistical infrequency as a definition of abnormality is more beneficial or whether it does more harm then good - discuss these arguments
Some statistically infrequent people benefit from being classed as abnormal
E.g. someone with a very low IQ and is then diagnosed with intellectual disability can then access support services or someone with a very high depression BDI score can benefit from the therapy given through diagnosis
However, not all statistically infrequent people benefit from this label - in fact, being ‘abnormal’ usually holds negative connotations, whilst this may not be at the fault of the definition itself its important to note that labelling someone as abnormal due to their statistical infrequency may create a social stigma around them and do more harm then good
E.g. someone with a low IQ who can cope with their chosen lifestyle without help from services may feel burdened by the label of being ‘statistically infrequent’
Therefore need to carefully evaluate the benefits and harm the statistical infrequency definition can bring
Explain deviation from social norms as a definition of abnormality
- Deviation from social norms = concerns behaviour that is different from the accepted standards of behaviour in a community or society
- Groups of people ( e.g. societies, communities) choose to define behaviour as abnormal on the basis that it offends their sense of what is ‘acceptable’ (i.e. their norm)
- There is a collective judgement as a society on the interpretation of the norm
- Social norms vary between generations and between every culture therefore there are very few universal abnormalities on the terms that it breaks a universal social norm
- E.g. homosexuality is not seen as abnormal in some countries, whereas in others it is as it breaks their perception of the social norm
- Antisocial personality disorder (APD) is on of the few characteristics which is generally regarded as a ‘universal norm’
- According to DSM-5 an important symptom of APD is “an absence of PROSOCIAL internal standards associated with failure to conform to lawful and CULTURALLY NORMATIVE ethical behaviour”
- Therefore APD generally considered a somewhat universal abnormality because a symptom is the inability to follow the moral social norm of the culture the person is being diagnosed from
Deviation from social norms as a definition of abnormality has real world application - state whether this is a strength or a weakness and explain why
STRENGTH
Used in clinical practice
E.g. key defining characteristic of antisocial personality disorder = failure to conform the the culturally acceptable ‘moral norm’ by showing aggressive behaviour, lack of empathy etc.
These signs of APD are all deviations from social norms - therefore can be used as a diagnostic tool for this mental disorder
Such norms also play into diagnosis of schizoptypal personality disorder - where term ‘abnormal’ used to characterise the thinking, behaviour and appearance of those with the disorder where it goes against social norms
Shows that the deviation from social norms definition criterion has REAL LIFE PRACTICAL VALUE in psychiatry for diagnosis
Deviation from social norms as a definition of abnormality has cultural and situational RELATIVISM - state whether this is a strength or a weakness and explain why
WEAKNESS
There is a large degree of variability between social norms in different cultures and even in different situations
Person from one cultural group may label someone from another culture as abnormal using their standards
E.g. hearing voices is the norm in some cultures (as messages from ancestors) but would be seen as an abnormality, and most likely would lead to a diagnosis, in most parts of the UK
Even within one cultural context social norms differ from one situation to another
E.g. Aggressive and deceitful behaviour in the context of family life would be seen as socially unacceptable (and would often lead to a diagnosis for antisocial personality disorder) than in the context of corporate deal-making
Means that we cannot RELIABILY use this definition of abnormality as it is extremely difficulty to judge deviation from social norms across different situations and cultures
There are too many possibilities for different interpretations of the social norm for it to be a CONSISTENT DIAGNOSTIC TOOL (can be used as a COUNTERPOINT for the real world application argument) as in some cultures diagnosis of a certain behaviour may seem disproportionate whilst in others it may seem appropriate
Deviation from social norms as a definition of abnormality has been exploited in the past to abuse some human rights - state whether this is a strength or a weakness and explain why
WEAKNESS
Using deviation from social norms to define someone as abnormal carries the risk of unfair labelling and leaving people open to human rights abuses
Historically this has been the case where diagnosis like nymphomania (women’s uncontrollable or excessive sexual desire - a behaviour which would go against a range of culture’s social norm) has been used to control women
Diagnoses like drapetomania (black slaves running away - a behaviour which, at the time, was seen as going against the white’s social norms) were a way to control slaves and avoid debate by accusing them with supposed ‘mental illness’
However, could argue that the definition, if handled sensitively, can be used to diagnose conditions like antisocial personality disorder and schizoptypal personality disorder
Therefore psychiatrists need to be careful when using this definition, especially with diagnosis, as it has a history of human rights abuses
Perhaps other definitions are better suited to define abnormality as this one has historically done more harm than good
Explain ‘failure to function adequately’ as a definition of abnormality
- Person may cross a line between ‘normal’ and ‘abnormal’ at the point where they can no longer cope with the demands of everyday life
When is someone failing to function adequately?
- Rosenhan + Seligman (1989) proposed additional signs when someone is not coping:
- When person no longer conforms to standard interpersonal rules e.g. respecting personal space
- When a person experiences severe personal stress
- When a person’s behaviour becomes irrational or dangerous to themselves or others
Can be used to diagnose intellectual personality disorder = not only does their IQ have to be statistically infrequent (i.e. below 70) but they also have to be failing to function adequately to receive full diagnosis
Failure to function adequately as a definition of abnormality represents a sensible threshold for when people need professional help - state whether this is a strength or a weakness and explain why
STRENGTH
Most of us have symptoms of mental disorder to some degree at some time
According to mental health charity, Mind, around 25% of people in the UK will experience a mental health problem in any given year
However, many people continue on even in the face of severely severe symptoms
Tends to be at the point where we cease to function adequately (i.e. when a person crosses this ‘threshold’) that people seek professional help or are noticed and referred for help by others
This criterion given by this definition means that treatment and services can be targeted at those who need it the most i.e. those who fail to function adequately
Some argue that failure to function adequately as a definition of abnormality is discriminatory and assumes that all non-standard lifestyle choices equate to being ‘abnormal’ - state whether this is a strength or a weakness and explain why
WEAKNESS
In practice it’s very difficult to identify when someone is really failing to function adequately or whether their lifestyle choice simply deviates from the social norm
E.g. not having a job or permanent address may seem like failing to function, and for some people it would be. However, people in nomadic communities simply have alternative lifestyle choices and choose to travel from place to place - they aren’t failing to function even when they would fit the definition
Those who favour high-risk leisure activities (e.g. sky diving) may be unreasonably classed as irrational and perhaps danger to themselves (a key characteristic of failing to function adequately) when in reality it may just be a hobby
Means that if we use this definition of abnormality people who make unusual choices (or simply live against the social norm) are at risk of being labelled as abnormal and their freedom of choice may be restricted
Have to handle this definition with care otherwise it could easily lead to discrimination against certain cultures being defined as ‘abnormal’ e.g. nomads
It is argued that simply failing to function does not equate to abnormality as it heavily depends on contextual factors as to why a person is failing to function - state whether this is a strength or a weakness and explain why
WEAKNESS
There are some circumstances in which most of us fail to cope for a time e.g. bereavement
In fact, being able to function adequately in this situation (bereavement) would actually be seen as abnormal - concept of abnormality goes completely against the definition in some cases
Therefore may be unfair to give someone a label that may cause them future problems just because they react to difficult circumstances
HOWEVER (COUNTERPOINT)
Arguably, failing to function is no less real just because the cause of it is clear
Also, some people seek professional help to adjust to circumstances like bereavement - therefore we can still use this definition to help these people seek support
Means that we need to be careful on how we label abnormality - perhaps its a situation where not all people who fail to function are abnormal, but all who are considered as abnormal fail to function in some way
The value of the definition itself may be heavily dependant on other contextual factors
Explain deviation from ideal mental health as a definition for abnormality
- Those considered as abnormal deviate from ideal mental health
- Jahoda suggested that normal people have good mental health, and to have this you need to meet the following criteria:
- No symptoms of distress
- Rational and perceive ourselves accurately
- Able to self-actualise (strive to meet our potential)
- Can cope with stress
- Have a realistic view of the world
- Good self-esteem and lack guilt
- Independent of other people
- Can successfully work, love and enjoy our leisure
- Inevitably there is some overlap between what we may call deviation from mental health and what we might call failure to function adequately
- E.g. someone’s inability to keep a job can be seen as either failing to cope with the pressure of work or as a deviation from the ideal of successfully working
Deviation from ideal mental health is a highly comprehensive definition for abnormality - state whether this is a strength or a weakness and explain why
STRENGTH
Jahoda’s concept of the ‘ideal mental health’ includes a range of criteria for distinguishing mental health from mental disorder
Covers most of the reasons why we might seek (or be referred to) help with mental health
In turn means that individual’s mental health can be discussed meaningfully with a range of professionals who might take different theoretical views
E.g. a medically-trained psychiatrist may focus on the symptoms using the criteria whereas a humanistic counsellor may focus in the self-actualisation aspect of the criteria
Means that ideal mental health provides a checklist against which we can assess ourselves and others and discuss psychological issues with a range of professionals
Takes a HOLLISTIC approach to define abnormality rather than focusing on just one key characteristic
Deviation from ideal mental health as a definition of abnormality may be CULTURE BOUND - state whether this is a strength or a weakness and explain why
WEAKNESS
Ideal mental health criterion’s different elements are not equally applicable across a range of cultures
Some of Jahoda’s criteria for ideal mental health are firmly located in the context of the US and Europe generally (i.e. heavily leans towards an INDIVIDUALIST mindset)
In particular, concept of self-actualisation would probably be dismissed as self-indulgent or selfish in particular COLLECTIVIST cultures rather than being a sign of ideal mental health
Even within Europe there is quite a bit of variation in the value placed on personal independence e.g. independence is very valuable in Germany whilst in Italy it’s not as such
Also, what defines success in our working, social and love lives is very different in a range of cultures - some aspects of the criterion are very SUBJECTIVE
Means that it is very difficult to apply the concept of ideal mental health from one culture to another - even within the culture Jahoda based the criterion on it is interpreted very differently (i.e. Europe)
Deviation from ideal mental health as a definition of abnormality sets an extremely high standard for ‘good mental health’ - discuss this statement
Very few of us attain all of Jahoda’s criteria for ideal mental health
Probably none of us achieve all of them at the same time or keep them up for very long
Therefore it can be disheartening to see an impossible set of standards to live up to in order to avoid being labelled ‘abnormal’
Questionable if it is truly valid- if by definition most of the population would be classed as ‘abnormal’ due to the impossibly difficult criterion to achieve and maintain, is it even a good definition in the first place?
However, having such a comprehensive set of criteria for mental health to work towards might be of practical value to someone wanting to understand and improve their mental health
Therefore value of the definition questionable - depends on the type of person using it in the first place
What is the DSM-5’s definition and categories of phobia?
- All phobias characterised by excessive fear and anxiety triggered by an object, place or situation
- Extent of the fear is disproportionate (i.e. IRRATIONAL) to any real danger proposed by the phobic stimulus
Categories of phobia and related anxiety disorder:
- Specific phobia = phobia of an object or a situation
- Social anxiety (social phobia) = phobia of a social situation e.g. public speaking
- Agoraphobia = phobia of being outside or in a public space
What are the behavioural characteristics of phobias?
- Panic
- Avoidance
- Endurance
Describe ‘panic’ as a behavioural characteristic of phobias
- Person with phobia may panic in response to presence of the phobic stimulus
- Involves range of behaviours e.g. crying, screaming or running away
- Children mat behave slightly differently e.g. freezing, crying or having a tantrum
Describe ‘avoidance’ as a behavioural characteristic of phobias
- Unless person is making a conscious effort to face their fear they tend to put a lot of effort in preventing contact with the phobic stimulus
- Avoidance can make it difficult for a person’s daily life depending on the phobia
- E.g. someone with a fear of the sun may avoid going outside or opening their curtains - makes it difficult for work life and social life
- Avoidance can interfere with work, education and social life
Describe ‘endurance’ as a behavioural characteristic of phobias
- Alternative behavioural response to avoidance is endurance
- Occurs when the person chooses to remain in the presence of the phobic stimulus
- E.g. a person with arachnophobia might choose to remain in the room with a spider, but will instead pay extreme attention to it rather than leaving
What are the emotional characteristics of phobias?
- Anxiety
- Fear
- Emotional response is unreasonable
Describe ‘anxiety’ as an emotional characteristic of phobias
- Phobias classed as anxiety disorders
- By definition involve an emotional response of anxiety i.e. an unpleasant state of high arousal
- Prevents a person relaxing
- Makes it very difficult to experience any positive emotion
- Anxiety can be long term
Describe ‘fear’ as an emotional characteristic of phobias
- Fear = the immediate and extremely unpleasant response experienced when encountering or thinking of the phobic stimulus
- Usually more intense but experienced for shorter periods of time compared to anxiety