Topic 4 - Psychopathology (complete!!!!) Flashcards
Explain statistical infrequency as a definition of abnormality
- Statistical infrequency = occurs when an individual has a lesson common characteristic in proportion to the population
- Those who are statistically infrequent are classed as abnormal
- According to the statistical definition, any common behaviour or characteristic within a population regarded as ‘normal’
- Any behaviour or characteristic that is uncommon (i.e. a very small proportion of the population has it) is regarded as ‘abnormal’
- Often used when we are dealing with characteristics that can be reliably measured e.g. IQ
- Majority of people’s scores will cluster around the mean, the further we go above or below this average the fewer will have that score - known as NORMAL DISTRIBUTION
- Produces a BELL SHAPED curve
- Mean IQ is 100 - most of the population (68%) have an IQ within this mean i.e. 85-115
- 94% of population have an IQ ranging from 70-130 (people who lie within this range = ‘normal’ as they have a characteristic common within the population)
- Only 2% of population have IQ above 130 and only another 2% of population have IQ below 70
- Those with IQ below 70 are very unusual (they have an uncommon characteristic when compared to the population) and so are ‘abnormal’ - often get diagnosis of ‘intellectual disability disorder’
Statistical infrequency as a definition of abnormality has real life application - state whether this is a strength or a weakness and explain why
STRENGTH
Used in clinical practice, both as part of formal diagnosis + as a way to assess the severity of a persons symptoms
E.g. diagnosis of intellectual disability disorder requires and IQ of below 70 (only 2% of population therefore statistically infrequent)
Also used in the BECK DEPRESSION INVENTORY (BDI) - a score of 30+ (top 5% of respondents) is widely interpreted as indicating severe depression
Statistical infrequency is a reliable quantitative measure for diagnosis - OBJECTIVE in it measurements as it considers the numerical infrequency rather than the SUBJECTIVE interpretation of a persons behaviours
Shows the REAL LIFE PRACTICAL VALUE of the statistical infrequency criterion in diagnostic and assessment processes
Statistical infrequency as a definition of abnormality does not consider that being infrequent in a population isn’t always regarded as ‘abnormal’ within a society - state whether this is a strength or a weakness and explain why
WEAKNESS
Infrequent characteristic can be positive as well as negative - i.e. being statistically infrequent doesn’t always lead to diagnosis
For every person with an IQ below 70 there is another with an IQ above 130 - yet we would not think of someone as abnormal for having a high IQ, in fact we would celebrate it
Similarly, we would not think of someone with a very low depression score on the BDI as abnormal, even if they are statistically infrequent
Therefore statistically infrequency cannot be the sole definition of abnormality as not all statistically infrequent people are regarded as abnormal
Means that, although statistical infrequency can form part of assessment and diagnostic procedures, it is never sufficient as the sole basis for defining abnormality
There is a debate on whether statistical infrequency as a definition of abnormality is more beneficial or whether it does more harm then good - discuss these arguments
Some statistically infrequent people benefit from being classed as abnormal
E.g. someone with a very low IQ and is then diagnosed with intellectual disability can then access support services or someone with a very high depression BDI score can benefit from the therapy given through diagnosis
However, not all statistically infrequent people benefit from this label - in fact, being ‘abnormal’ usually holds negative connotations, whilst this may not be at the fault of the definition itself its important to note that labelling someone as abnormal due to their statistical infrequency may create a social stigma around them and do more harm then good
E.g. someone with a low IQ who can cope with their chosen lifestyle without help from services may feel burdened by the label of being ‘statistically infrequent’
Therefore need to carefully evaluate the benefits and harm the statistical infrequency definition can bring
Explain deviation from social norms as a definition of abnormality
- Deviation from social norms = concerns behaviour that is different from the accepted standards of behaviour in a community or society
- Groups of people ( e.g. societies, communities) choose to define behaviour as abnormal on the basis that it offends their sense of what is ‘acceptable’ (i.e. their norm)
- There is a collective judgement as a society on the interpretation of the norm
- Social norms vary between generations and between every culture therefore there are very few universal abnormalities on the terms that it breaks a universal social norm
- E.g. homosexuality is not seen as abnormal in some countries, whereas in others it is as it breaks their perception of the social norm
- Antisocial personality disorder (APD) is on of the few characteristics which is generally regarded as a ‘universal norm’
- According to DSM-5 an important symptom of APD is “an absence of PROSOCIAL internal standards associated with failure to conform to lawful and CULTURALLY NORMATIVE ethical behaviour”
- Therefore APD generally considered a somewhat universal abnormality because a symptom is the inability to follow the moral social norm of the culture the person is being diagnosed from
Deviation from social norms as a definition of abnormality has real world application - state whether this is a strength or a weakness and explain why
STRENGTH
Used in clinical practice
E.g. key defining characteristic of antisocial personality disorder = failure to conform the the culturally acceptable ‘moral norm’ by showing aggressive behaviour, lack of empathy etc.
These signs of APD are all deviations from social norms - therefore can be used as a diagnostic tool for this mental disorder
Such norms also play into diagnosis of schizoptypal personality disorder - where term ‘abnormal’ used to characterise the thinking, behaviour and appearance of those with the disorder where it goes against social norms
Shows that the deviation from social norms definition criterion has REAL LIFE PRACTICAL VALUE in psychiatry for diagnosis
Deviation from social norms as a definition of abnormality has cultural and situational RELATIVISM - state whether this is a strength or a weakness and explain why
WEAKNESS
There is a large degree of variability between social norms in different cultures and even in different situations
Person from one cultural group may label someone from another culture as abnormal using their standards
E.g. hearing voices is the norm in some cultures (as messages from ancestors) but would be seen as an abnormality, and most likely would lead to a diagnosis, in most parts of the UK
Even within one cultural context social norms differ from one situation to another
E.g. Aggressive and deceitful behaviour in the context of family life would be seen as socially unacceptable (and would often lead to a diagnosis for antisocial personality disorder) than in the context of corporate deal-making
Means that we cannot RELIABILY use this definition of abnormality as it is extremely difficulty to judge deviation from social norms across different situations and cultures
There are too many possibilities for different interpretations of the social norm for it to be a CONSISTENT DIAGNOSTIC TOOL (can be used as a COUNTERPOINT for the real world application argument) as in some cultures diagnosis of a certain behaviour may seem disproportionate whilst in others it may seem appropriate
Deviation from social norms as a definition of abnormality has been exploited in the past to abuse some human rights - state whether this is a strength or a weakness and explain why
WEAKNESS
Using deviation from social norms to define someone as abnormal carries the risk of unfair labelling and leaving people open to human rights abuses
Historically this has been the case where diagnosis like nymphomania (women’s uncontrollable or excessive sexual desire - a behaviour which would go against a range of culture’s social norm) has been used to control women
Diagnoses like drapetomania (black slaves running away - a behaviour which, at the time, was seen as going against the white’s social norms) were a way to control slaves and avoid debate by accusing them with supposed ‘mental illness’
However, could argue that the definition, if handled sensitively, can be used to diagnose conditions like antisocial personality disorder and schizoptypal personality disorder
Therefore psychiatrists need to be careful when using this definition, especially with diagnosis, as it has a history of human rights abuses
Perhaps other definitions are better suited to define abnormality as this one has historically done more harm than good
Explain ‘failure to function adequately’ as a definition of abnormality
- Person may cross a line between ‘normal’ and ‘abnormal’ at the point where they can no longer cope with the demands of everyday life
When is someone failing to function adequately?
- Rosenhan + Seligman (1989) proposed additional signs when someone is not coping:
- When person no longer conforms to standard interpersonal rules e.g. respecting personal space
- When a person experiences severe personal stress
- When a person’s behaviour becomes irrational or dangerous to themselves or others
Can be used to diagnose intellectual personality disorder = not only does their IQ have to be statistically infrequent (i.e. below 70) but they also have to be failing to function adequately to receive full diagnosis
Failure to function adequately as a definition of abnormality represents a sensible threshold for when people need professional help - state whether this is a strength or a weakness and explain why
STRENGTH
Most of us have symptoms of mental disorder to some degree at some time
According to mental health charity, Mind, around 25% of people in the UK will experience a mental health problem in any given year
However, many people continue on even in the face of severely severe symptoms
Tends to be at the point where we cease to function adequately (i.e. when a person crosses this ‘threshold’) that people seek professional help or are noticed and referred for help by others
This criterion given by this definition means that treatment and services can be targeted at those who need it the most i.e. those who fail to function adequately
Some argue that failure to function adequately as a definition of abnormality is discriminatory and assumes that all non-standard lifestyle choices equate to being ‘abnormal’ - state whether this is a strength or a weakness and explain why
WEAKNESS
In practice it’s very difficult to identify when someone is really failing to function adequately or whether their lifestyle choice simply deviates from the social norm
E.g. not having a job or permanent address may seem like failing to function, and for some people it would be. However, people in nomadic communities simply have alternative lifestyle choices and choose to travel from place to place - they aren’t failing to function even when they would fit the definition
Those who favour high-risk leisure activities (e.g. sky diving) may be unreasonably classed as irrational and perhaps danger to themselves (a key characteristic of failing to function adequately) when in reality it may just be a hobby
Means that if we use this definition of abnormality people who make unusual choices (or simply live against the social norm) are at risk of being labelled as abnormal and their freedom of choice may be restricted
Have to handle this definition with care otherwise it could easily lead to discrimination against certain cultures being defined as ‘abnormal’ e.g. nomads
It is argued that simply failing to function does not equate to abnormality as it heavily depends on contextual factors as to why a person is failing to function - state whether this is a strength or a weakness and explain why
WEAKNESS
There are some circumstances in which most of us fail to cope for a time e.g. bereavement
In fact, being able to function adequately in this situation (bereavement) would actually be seen as abnormal - concept of abnormality goes completely against the definition in some cases
Therefore may be unfair to give someone a label that may cause them future problems just because they react to difficult circumstances
HOWEVER (COUNTERPOINT)
Arguably, failing to function is no less real just because the cause of it is clear
Also, some people seek professional help to adjust to circumstances like bereavement - therefore we can still use this definition to help these people seek support
Means that we need to be careful on how we label abnormality - perhaps its a situation where not all people who fail to function are abnormal, but all who are considered as abnormal fail to function in some way
The value of the definition itself may be heavily dependant on other contextual factors
Explain deviation from ideal mental health as a definition for abnormality
- Those considered as abnormal deviate from ideal mental health
- Jahoda suggested that normal people have good mental health, and to have this you need to meet the following criteria:
- No symptoms of distress
- Rational and perceive ourselves accurately
- Able to self-actualise (strive to meet our potential)
- Can cope with stress
- Have a realistic view of the world
- Good self-esteem and lack guilt
- Independent of other people
- Can successfully work, love and enjoy our leisure
- Inevitably there is some overlap between what we may call deviation from mental health and what we might call failure to function adequately
- E.g. someone’s inability to keep a job can be seen as either failing to cope with the pressure of work or as a deviation from the ideal of successfully working
Deviation from ideal mental health is a highly comprehensive definition for abnormality - state whether this is a strength or a weakness and explain why
STRENGTH
Jahoda’s concept of the ‘ideal mental health’ includes a range of criteria for distinguishing mental health from mental disorder
Covers most of the reasons why we might seek (or be referred to) help with mental health
In turn means that individual’s mental health can be discussed meaningfully with a range of professionals who might take different theoretical views
E.g. a medically-trained psychiatrist may focus on the symptoms using the criteria whereas a humanistic counsellor may focus in the self-actualisation aspect of the criteria
Means that ideal mental health provides a checklist against which we can assess ourselves and others and discuss psychological issues with a range of professionals
Takes a HOLLISTIC approach to define abnormality rather than focusing on just one key characteristic
Deviation from ideal mental health as a definition of abnormality may be CULTURE BOUND - state whether this is a strength or a weakness and explain why
WEAKNESS
Ideal mental health criterion’s different elements are not equally applicable across a range of cultures
Some of Jahoda’s criteria for ideal mental health are firmly located in the context of the US and Europe generally (i.e. heavily leans towards an INDIVIDUALIST mindset)
In particular, concept of self-actualisation would probably be dismissed as self-indulgent or selfish in particular COLLECTIVIST cultures rather than being a sign of ideal mental health
Even within Europe there is quite a bit of variation in the value placed on personal independence e.g. independence is very valuable in Germany whilst in Italy it’s not as such
Also, what defines success in our working, social and love lives is very different in a range of cultures - some aspects of the criterion are very SUBJECTIVE
Means that it is very difficult to apply the concept of ideal mental health from one culture to another - even within the culture Jahoda based the criterion on it is interpreted very differently (i.e. Europe)
Deviation from ideal mental health as a definition of abnormality sets an extremely high standard for ‘good mental health’ - discuss this statement
Very few of us attain all of Jahoda’s criteria for ideal mental health
Probably none of us achieve all of them at the same time or keep them up for very long
Therefore it can be disheartening to see an impossible set of standards to live up to in order to avoid being labelled ‘abnormal’
Questionable if it is truly valid- if by definition most of the population would be classed as ‘abnormal’ due to the impossibly difficult criterion to achieve and maintain, is it even a good definition in the first place?
However, having such a comprehensive set of criteria for mental health to work towards might be of practical value to someone wanting to understand and improve their mental health
Therefore value of the definition questionable - depends on the type of person using it in the first place
What is the DSM-5’s definition and categories of phobia?
- All phobias characterised by excessive fear and anxiety triggered by an object, place or situation
- Extent of the fear is disproportionate (i.e. IRRATIONAL) to any real danger proposed by the phobic stimulus
Categories of phobia and related anxiety disorder:
- Specific phobia = phobia of an object or a situation
- Social anxiety (social phobia) = phobia of a social situation e.g. public speaking
- Agoraphobia = phobia of being outside or in a public space
What are the behavioural characteristics of phobias?
- Panic
- Avoidance
- Endurance
Describe ‘panic’ as a behavioural characteristic of phobias
- Person with phobia may panic in response to presence of the phobic stimulus
- Involves range of behaviours e.g. crying, screaming or running away
- Children mat behave slightly differently e.g. freezing, crying or having a tantrum
Describe ‘avoidance’ as a behavioural characteristic of phobias
- Unless person is making a conscious effort to face their fear they tend to put a lot of effort in preventing contact with the phobic stimulus
- Avoidance can make it difficult for a person’s daily life depending on the phobia
- E.g. someone with a fear of the sun may avoid going outside or opening their curtains - makes it difficult for work life and social life
- Avoidance can interfere with work, education and social life
Describe ‘endurance’ as a behavioural characteristic of phobias
- Alternative behavioural response to avoidance is endurance
- Occurs when the person chooses to remain in the presence of the phobic stimulus
- E.g. a person with arachnophobia might choose to remain in the room with a spider, but will instead pay extreme attention to it rather than leaving
What are the emotional characteristics of phobias?
- Anxiety
- Fear
- Emotional response is unreasonable
Describe ‘anxiety’ as an emotional characteristic of phobias
- Phobias classed as anxiety disorders
- By definition involve an emotional response of anxiety i.e. an unpleasant state of high arousal
- Prevents a person relaxing
- Makes it very difficult to experience any positive emotion
- Anxiety can be long term
Describe ‘fear’ as an emotional characteristic of phobias
- Fear = the immediate and extremely unpleasant response experienced when encountering or thinking of the phobic stimulus
- Usually more intense but experienced for shorter periods of time compared to anxiety
Describe ‘emotional responses being unreasonable’ as an emotional characteristic of phobias
- Anxiety or fear is much greater than what is considered ‘normal’
- Response disproportionate to the real threat posed by the phobic stimulus
- Response is irrational when compared to the reaction a person without a phobia has to the phobic stimulus
E.g. a person with arachnophobia may experience extreme fear when in the presence of even a small spider - this fear seems irrational and unreasonable when we compare it to the reaction a person who doesn’t have arachnophobia
What are the cognitive characteristics of phobias?
- Selective attention to the phobic stimulus
- Irrational beliefs
- Cognitive distortions
Describe ‘selective attention to the phobic stimulus’ as a cognitive characteristic of phobias
- If a person can see the phobic stimulus it is hard to look away from it
- Keeping our attention on something dangerous is a good thing when reacting quickly to a threat, however it is not so useful when this fear is irrational
E.g. a person with arachnophobia will struggle to concentrate when they notice a spider in the room - attention is unnecessarily focused on the phobic stimulus
- This selective attention can affect a person’s ability to function or concentrate once in contact with the phobic stimulus
Describe ‘irrational beliefs’ as a cognitive characteristic of phobias
- Person with a phobia may hold thoughts that cannot be easily explained and don’t have any basis in reality in relation to phobic stimuli
E.g. a person with a social phobia can have irrational beliefs such as “I must be perfect otherwise people will make fun of me”
- Beliefs may further intensify phobia or instigate further irrational thoughts
- Some people may believe that phobia is justified based on their irrational beliefs
Describe ‘cognitive distortions’ as a cognitive characteristic of phobias
- Perceptions of the phobic stimuli may be inaccurate and unrealistic
E.g. someone with arachnophobia may perceive even a small spider as very large and potentially deadly when in reality this is not the case
What are the two components of the two-process model as a behavioural approach for explaining phobias?
- Phobias are acquired (i.e. learned) by classical conditioning
- Phobias are maintained by operant conditioning
- Created by Mowrer (1960)
Describe ‘acquisition by classical conditioning’ as a behavioural approach for explaining phobias. Include any relevant research
- Involves learning to associate something of which we initially have no fear (neutral stimulus) with something that already triggers an innate fear response (unconditioned stimulus)
Watson and Rayner (1920) studied how phobias can be created via classical conditioning:
- Created a phobia in a 9-month old baby called “Little Albert”
- Albert showed no usual anxiety to neutral stimulus (a white rat) at start of study (NS)
- However, to create this phobia whenever the rat was presented to Albert the researchers made a loud, frightening noise by banging an iron bar close to his ear
- Noise = unconditioned stimulus (UCS), which produced and unconditioned response (UCR) of fear
- When NS (rat) and the UCS are encountered close together in time Albert began to associate these two stimuli together where both began to trigger the fear response
- Albert began to display fear when seeing the rat - the rat became the conditioned stimulus (CS) that produced the conditioned response of fear (CR)
- Conditioning then became GENERALISED to similar objects
- E.g. they tested Albert by showing him other furry objects such as a non-white rabbit and a fur coat - little Albert showed the same levels as distress as the CS
Describe ‘maintenance by operant conditioning’ as a behavioural approach for explaining phobias
- Responses acquired by classical conditioning usually tend to decline over time
- However, phobias are often long-lasting due to operant conditioning
- Operant conditioning takes place when our behaviour is reinforced (rewarded) or punished
- Reinforcement tends to increase the frequency of behaviour and can be applied to both positive and negative reinforcement
- In negative reinforcement an individual avoids a situation that is unpleasant - such behaviour results in a desirable consequence (i.e. not coming into contact with the phobic stimulus) which means behaviour is repeated
- Mowrer suggested that whenever we avoid a phobic stimulus we successfully escape the fear and anxiety that would be experienced if we remained there
- Reduction in fear reinforces the avoidance behaviour and so the phobia is maintained
The two-process model has real life application as a behavioural explanation for phobias - state whether this is a strength or a weakness and explain why
STRENGTH
Has real world application in exposure therapies (e.g. systematic desensitisation and flooding)
Distinctive element of two-process model is the idea that phobias are maintained by avoidance of the phobic stimulus
This element important in explaining why people with phobias benefit from being exposed to the phobic stimulus
Once the avoidance behaviour is prevented it ceases to be reinforced by the experience of anxiety reduction and avoidance therefore declines
In behavioural terms the phobia is the avoidance behaviour so when this avoidance is eventually fully prevented the phobia is considered ‘cured’
This shows the value of the two-process approach because it identifies a means of treating phobias - has real life application with a positive effect for society as a whole
The two-process model as a behavioural explanation for phobias fails to take into account the cognitive aspects of the disorder - state whether this is a strength or a weakness and explain why
WEAKNESS
Behavioural explanations (including the two-process model) only focus on the behavioural characteristics of phobias - particularly avoidance of the phobic stimulus
However we know that phobias are not simply avoidance responses - they also have a significant cognitive element e.g. irrational beliefs about the phobic stimulus
The two-process model explains avoidance behaviour but does not offer an adequate explanation for phobic cognitions - therefore theory is REDUCTIONIST when explaining phobias
Means that the two-process model only explains the symptoms of phobias up to an EXTENT i.e. it is only a partial explanation for phobias
There is research support for the link between bad experiences and phobias - state whether this is a strength or a weakness of the two-process model as a behavioural explanation for phobias and explain why
STRENGTH
Little Albert study illustrates how a frightening experience involving a stimulus can classically condition a phobia of that stimulus
More systematic evidence comes from study by Jongh et al (2006):
- Found that 73% of people with a fear of dental treatment had experienced a traumatic experience, mostly involving dentistry
- Others with this phobia had experienced being a victim of a violent crime
- Association between dentistry and traumatic experience led to classical conditioning and development of the phobia
- Compared to control group of people with low dental anxiety, only 21% had experienced a traumatic event
Multiple sources of research evidence conforms that the association between a neutral stimulus (e.g. dentistry) and an unconditioned response (e.g. pain) does lead to the development of a phobia, as the theory suggests
Some psychologists argue that not all phobias appear following a bad experience - state whether this is a strength or a weakness of the two-process model as a behavioural explanation for phobias and explain why
WEAKNESS (COUNTERPOINT to research evidence for link between negative experience and phobia argument)
Argued that some common phobias e.g. phobia of snakes occur in populations where very few people have any experience of snakes let alone traumatic ones
Also, considering the other direction, not all frightening experiences lead to phobias (i.e. association between the neutral stimulus and unconditioned response does not always occur)
Means that the association between phobias and frightening experiences is not as strong as we would expect if behavioural theories provided a complete explanation for phobias
Yet again, the two process model only explains phobias up to an EXTENT - classical conditioning to create a phobia is not guaranteed just because an unconditioned response is stimulated like the theory suggests
There is debate between the two-process model as a behavioural explanation for phobias and the influence of evolution - discuss these viewpoints
Behavioural models of phobias (e.g. the two process model) provide credible individual explanations
I.e. they can explain how a particular person develops and maintains a particular phobia
However, there are more general aspects to phobias that may be better explained by evolutionary theory
E.g. we tend to acquire phobias of things that have presented a danger in our evolutionary past e.g. snakes
Seligman (1971) described this as PREPAREDNESS
Means that there may be a wider discussion in terms of nature vs nurture when explaining phobias - behavioural explanations are just one side of this debate
What are the three processes of systematic desensitisation (SD) and which mental disorder does it treat?
- The anxiety hierarchy
- Relaxation
- Exposure
- Aims to treat phobias by the process of classical conditioning
- New response to phobic stimulus is learned (i.e. conditioned response changed from anxiety to relaxation)
- Process of creating a different conditioned response = COUNTERCONDITIONING
Describe the first process in systematic desensitisation when treating phobias
- The anxiety hierarchy:
- Put together by a client with a phobia and the therapist
- List of situations related to the phobic stimulus that provoke anxiety arranged in order from least to most frightening
E.g. someone with arachnophobia might identify a picture of a small spider as low on their anxiety hierarchy and holding a tarantula at the top of their hierarchy
Describe the second process in systematic desensitisation when treating phobias
- Relaxation:
- Therapist teaches client to relax as deeply as possible
- Impossible to be afraid and relaxed at the same time, so one emotion prevents the other = known as RECIPROCAL INHIBITION
- Relaxation might involve breathing exercises or mental imagery techniques
E.g. clients can be taught to imagine themselves in relaxing situations like lying on the beach or they might learn meditation
- Relaxation can also be achieved via. drugs e.g. Valium
Describe the third process in systematic desensitisation when treating phobias
- Exposure :
- Finally client is exposed to phobic stimulus when in a relaxed state
- Takes place over several sessions, starting at the bottom of the anxiety hierarchy
- When client can consistently stay relaxed in the presence of the lower levels of the phobic stimulus they move up the hierarchy
- Treatment is successful when the client can stay relaxed in situations high on the anxiety hierarchy
There is research evidence for the effectiveness of systematic desensitisation - state whether this is a strength or a weakness and explain why
STRENGTH
Gilroy et al (2003):
- Followed up 42 people who had SD for arachnophobia in 3 45-minute sessions (total of 2hrs 15mins)
- At both 3 + 33 months, the SD group were less fearful than a control group treated by relaxation without exposure (i.e. without all 3 elements of SD)
In a recent review Wechsler et al (2019) concluded that SD is effective for social phobia + agoraphobia
Research support for treatment suggests that SD is likely to be helpful and effective for people with phobias
It is arguable that research into systematic desensitisation’s effectiveness only accounts for a small proportion of phobias - state whether this is a strength or a weakness and explain why
WEAKNESS (COUNTERPOINT to research support)
Cannot generalise research support to all phobias
Just because SD has research support for being effective against arachnophobia and agoraphobia doesn’t necessarily mean that it would work for others e.g. xanthophobia (fear of colour yellow)
Research into phobias hard to come by, with only 2% of UK population with phobia
Therefore, research support for SD (especially for the more niche phobias) would be extremely rare
Therefore we cannot conclude the SD is effective against all phobias, rather there has been research support for it being effective against SOME phobias, particularly the more ‘common’ ones
Means that research support for SD is still lacking - mainly due to the rarity of phobias themselves
Systematic desensitisation can be used to treat a wider demographic of those with phobias when compared to other treatments - state whether this is a strength or a weakness and explain why
STRENGTH
One of the most INCLUSIVE treatments as it takes into account those with learning disabilities
Significant proportion of those with phobias also have a learning disability
However main alternatives - mainly cognitive therapies - not suitable for these people
People with learning disabilities often struggle with cognitive therapies which require complex rational thought
May also feel confused and distressed by traumatic experience of flooding - in most severe cases person may not even have the mental capacity to give fully informed consent to such a traumatic treatment
Instead SD takes a more slow and gentle approach much more preferable to these people
Means that SD is the most inclusive and appropriate treatment for a significant proportion of those who have phobias as the barrier of entry is not very high
Some psychologists would like to modernise systematic desensitisation as a treatment for phobias by integrating it with virtual reality - discuss this viewpoint
Traditional SD involves exposure to phobic stimulus in a real-world setting
However argued that there are advantages to conducting the exposure part of SD in VR
E.g. exposure through VR can be used to avoid dangerous situations e.g. heights + is cost-effective because the psychologist and client do not have to leave the consulting room
Important for treatments to be flexible in a world where technological advancements are rapid - integrating SD to VR is an example of adaptation to modern society
However, evidence from some psychologists suggesting that VR exposure may be less effective than real exposure for social phobias because it lacks realism (Wechsler et al, 2019)
Perhaps integrating SD with VR may be more effective for some phobias over others
What is flooding and how does it work? Which mental disorder does flooding treat?
- Treats phobias
- Involves exposing people to phobic stimulus without any gradual build-up in an anxiety hierarchy
- I.e. involves immediate exposure to a very frightening situation
- Sessions typically longer than SD sessions, sometimes only one long session necessary to cure a phobia
- Flooding stops phobic responses very quickly by removing the option of avoidance behaviour
- Taking away the option to avoid the phobic stimulus helps client quickly learn that it is actually harmless - known as EXTINCTION in classical conditioning terms
- Conditioned response quickly EXTINGUISED when the conditioned stimulus (e.g. a dog) is encountered without the unconditioned stimulus (e.g. being bitten)
- Result is that the conditioned stimulus no longer produces a conditioned response (e.g. fear) because the ASSOCIATION between the CS and UCS is quickly extinguished through removing avoidance behaviour
- In some case client may achieve relaxation in presence of phobic stimulus due to EXHAUSTION by their own fear response
Describe the ethical safeguards put in place when treating a phobia using flooding
- Flooding not exactly unethical if precautions made to receive fully informed consent - even if the experience is very distressing
- Client made sure to be fully prepared before flooding sessions
- Client normally given choice between systematic desensitisation and flooding