Topic 4 - Crime and Punishment Flashcards
police relationship with the gment
they enforce laws set my gment
overseen by home office
statutory laws guide police behaviour e.g.PACE act
CPS relationship with gment
impose laws set my gment
overseen by ministry of justice
CPS representative behaviour in trials is guided by law e.g must disclose evidence as ruled in PACE act 1996
court and tribunal service relationship with gment
impose laws set by gment
judiciary work with courts to convict and sentence offenders
HM prison relationship with gment
overseen by ministry of justice
national probation service relationship with gment
overseen by ministry of justice
CPS relationship with police
CPS advise police on what evidence is needed
decide on charge based on evidence collected by police (reviewed using the full code test/threshold)
inform police on decision to charge
police provide evidence for the prosecution of offenders
court and tribunal service relationship with police
police bring defendants who are being held in custody to court
giving evidence as prosecution witnesses
providing protection for vulnerable witnesses
holding defendants in police cells
arrange video calls for prisoners who can’t attend court
HM prison relationship with police
transported to prisons if ordered by courts
arrest offenders recalled on probation and return to prison
facilitating interviews with prisoners involved in ongoing police investigations
as a resells of sarah’s law police also cooperate with prison and probation in managing the list of child sex offenders living in the area
national probation service relationship with police
as a result of Sarah’s law, police also cooperate with prison and probation in managing thr list of child sex offenders living in the area
Police may support probation officers attending welfare checks on offenders.
courts relationship with police
They would work with the police to arrange safe transportation of defendants to court, as well as ensuring safe return to holding following trials should they extend beyond one day.
courts relationship with judiciary
Members of the Judiciary sit within a range of different courts and contribute to law creation through case law. Judiciary is also responsible for supervising the efficient running of the courts system and contribute to the funding of individual courts.
courts relationship with national probation service
Members of the Judiciary sit within a range of different courts and contribute to law creation through case law. Judiciary is also responsible for supervising the efficient running of the courts system and contribute to the funding of individual courts.
courts relationship with HM prison service
Prisoners may need to return to court to attend a hearing or trial. Therefore prisons may organise meeting with defensive counsel or transport to court
HM prison service relationship with police
The police will transport prisoners to prison if ordered by the court. They would arrest any offenders recalled on probation to return them to prison.
They would facilitate interviews of prisoners for ongoing police investigations.
HM prison service relationship with courts
They organise delivery of offenders to and from court.
Impost custodial sentences given by the courts.
They will hold defendants on remand.
They will facilitate visits from defendant solicitors/barristers to clients in prison.
HM prison service relationship with judiciary
They will impose the prison sentences given by the Judiciary.
HM prison service relationship with national probation service
They will work together to decide if a prisoner can be paroled and organise support within the community.
HM prison service relationship with gment
they are overseen by the ministry of justice
national probation service
If an offender commits an offence whilst on probation or breaches terms of license, then the police will arrest them and return them to prison or take them back into custody.
national probation service relationship with courts
Probation officers may need to provide evidence in court in relation to an offender’s behaviour on probation and the risk associated with re-offending.
They are also responsible for providing pre-sentencing reports to help determine the most appropriate sentence and impose community orders given by the courts.
national probation service relationship with HM prison service
They will work with the prison service to supervise offenders released on license into the community.
They will also visit prisoners who are being reviewed for parole to assess their risk and produce a report either supporting or denying their application.
national probation service relationship with gment
overseen by ministry of justice
strengths of the police at achieving social control
Provide an element of safety to communities and society as a whole, and if people do have trust in authority like the police then social control can be maintained
● The police are able to attend to both emergency and non-emergency situations, which means social control can be maintained widely in society
weaknesses of the police achieving social control
● Bias & Prejudice - police will have a hard time maintaining social control with a public that have an opinion that the police hold bias attitudes towards certain protected characteristics e.g. Stephen Lawrence
● The police are able to attend to both emergency and non-emergency situations, which means social control can be maintained widely in society
● With inadequate training due to poor funding police will not be able to maintain social control as they can mishandle situations and cause to escalate.
● Some crimes still go unreported, and therefore the targets the Home Office sets the police force are not always where there are issues of social control. There is also suggestion to say that even when crimes are reported they are not always investigated. For example, the Metropolitan Police dropped 2.6 times as many cases on the day they were reported in 2017 as they did in 2016 - a total of over 34,000 in the year.
strengths of the cps at achieving social control
● The CPS have had some success in achieving social control by preparing and presenting cases in court to secure conviction, for example in 2018 the CPS prosecuted 80,000 cases in Crown Court and over 450,000 cases in Magistrates’ Courts with 84.1% of the defendants prosecuted being convicted
weaknesses of the cps at achieving social control
● Media reporting of the CPS’s performance has not always been favourable. In 2018 the Guardian reported that the CPS’s specialist rape prosecutors had been advised to drop a number of supposedly “weak” cases - which experts advised would limit victims’ access to justice - espiecally those who are vulnerable and less likely to sway a jury.
●
● The evidential test carried out by the
CPS is based on whether it would convince a jury of a guilty verdict - but trial outcomes shouldn’t be the focus it should be more about bringing cases to justice and encouraging more victims to report crimes.
●
● In recent years the CPS has suffered budget cuts of 25% and it has lost a third of its staff. This makes the job incredibly difficult because it creates back logs when there are less staff but advancements in evidence such as digital technology to extract evidence from which creates additional heavy workload.
strengths of the judiciary achieving social control
● Although there have been cases of gender bias in the judiciary, they seem less common today than in the 1980s or 1990s and may be less a cause of current concern
● Although criticised for being out of touch with society, being this way may just mean judges get to remain independent by avoiding being swayed or unduly influenced by public opinion, media outrage and moral panics.
weaknesses of the judiciary at achieving social control
● The media often present judges to be old, white, upper-class males who are out of touch with society. Because judges tend to come from a narrow, unrepresentative section of society they are sometimes suspect of making biased judgements as a result
- 71% of judges are male
- only 5% of judges are from minority backgrounds
● Although criticised for being out of touch with society, being this way may just mean judges get to remain independent by avoiding being swayed or unduly influenced by public opinion, media outrage and moral panics.
● Judges have often been criticised for handing out unduly lenient sentences, and if it is felt that there has been a gross error in the sentencing decision the Court of Appeal will be asked to review the sentence and if necessary increase it. In 2017, 173 cases were referred of which 137 had their sentences increased.
strengths of the hm prison service at achieving social control
● Attempt to encourage rehabilitation so that prisoners can live a crime-free life when released
● Social control can be maintained whilst the inmates are physically in prison, getting basic needs and support.
weaknesses of hm prison service at achieving social control
● Social control over inmates has become harder over the years due to staff and budget cuts. Between 2010 - 2018 the number of prison officers fell by 15%, and by 2018 a third of prison officers had less than two years’ experience due to experienced staff being more likely to leave
● It is hard to maintain social control when prisons have become significantly overcrowded. The prison population has almost doubled from 43,000 in 1993 to roughly 83,000 in 2019, leading to 58% of prisons being overcrowded leading to discontent and rule breaking
● Many prisoners serve short sentences, there is not always time to address their complex needs for rehabilitation to be effective
strengths of probation service at achieving social control
● The National Probation Service (NPS) have been more successful than privatised services in achieving social control, and has about half the rate of re-offending compared with prison
weaknesses of the probation service at achieving social control
● Some probation services belong to a privatised sector of community rehabilitation companies. In 2014, 21 private companies called Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRCs) were set up, but 19 out of the 21 failed to meet their targets for rehabilitating offenders and had to have an extra £342 million pumped in
● Companies like CRCs often failed to provide adequate protection to victims and their children when domestic abusers were returned to the community, as without supervision it defeats the objective of keeping the community safe
● NPS are suffering from a critical national shortage of probation officers and high workloads have led to professional standards being compromised.
strengths of pressure groups at achieving social control
● Charities are often better placed to reduce offending and reoffending than government agencies like probation officers as they have a strong commitment to one group or issue and specialist knowledge of people’s needs.
● Often strongly motivated and go the extra mile in a way that the government of privatised agencies may not. For example, Nacro campaigns to end Friday releases from prisons to prevent individuals having no time to access vital services which may lead to sleeping rough, which is a major driver of re-offending.
weaknesses of pressure groups at achieving social control
● Voluntary organisations, so they only exist where people are concerned about a particular issue or group - not always a large number of individuals
● A lot of charities are set up about the victim of a crime and not aimed at the criminal themselves in attempt for rehabilitation and preventing re-offending. Media can demonise a particular category of an offender, which makes it harder for charities that work with them to build support
● Easier to persuade the public to donate funds for some group or causes than others that can be just as equally important or deserving. Governments will support and fund charities often too, but only if it fits with their political and financial priorities.
what is the due process model
described as a model of justice which believes in preserving the rights of defendants and the idea of a suspect being innocent until proven guilty. focuses on the fairness of defendants by ensuring police powers are not increased
what are the 2 aims of criminal justice
To protect society, criminals should be caught and locked up as quickly as possible. It’s worth risking a few innocent people going to prison if this helps us to catch most of the guilty ones
● To protect the individual, it shouldn’t be easy to convict a person of a crime. It’s better to risk some guilty people going free than to send an innocent person to prison
examples that illustrate the crime control model
The partial abolishment of ‘double jeopardy’ rule for serious offences in Criminal Justice Act 2003
● The extended pre-charge detention time up to 28 days for terrorist offences in Terrorism Act 2006
● Allowing the introduction of ‘bad character’ evidence and previous convictions information for the courts to consider when deliberating a verdict
● Increase in stop and searches in England and Wales 2020
● No automatic appeals in crown court cases
● Not judged by jury in magistrates’ court (magistrates more likely to convict)
● Inference of guilt when suspect/defendant remains silent (not a right to
silence)
● Immigration Act 1971 (Windrush for example)
examples of areas of law that support the due process model
- The acknowledgement of the need for police procedural safeguards by the introduction of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE) 1984
- All interviews are now recorded and suspects have the right to legal representation, as well other rights afforded to suspects.
- The Human Rights Act 1998 allows for criminal justice practices to be thoroughly looked at from a human rights perspective
- GOWISELY in Stop and Searches
- Rules of evidence that must be followed
- Trial by jury of your peers and the right to appeal conviction and/or sentencing
what 2 theories link to the due process model
labelling theory, left realism
how does the due process model link to the labelling theory
Police may be tempted to act illegally and harrass groups that they label as
‘typical criminals’
• The Due Process model offers some protection as it requires the police to
follow lawful procedures
• Police must follow due process - act lawfully and non-discriminatory
what case study supports the due process model linking to the labelling theory
whitehouse far,
how does the due process model link to left realism
• Argues that oppressive ‘militaristic policing’ of poor areas triggers
confrontations
• Residents would be unwilling to help the police, as there is a lack of trust in
this authority.
retribution definition
Offenders are punished, to give us our revenge.
deterrence definition
This is used to discourage criminal behaviour in the
first place.
rehabilitation definition
this is an attempt to reform offenders behaviour
incapacitation definition
Punishment removes offenders from society to protect the public.
repartition definition
Offenders should give back to victims or society, to
repay harm done.
2 examples of retribution
● Giving offenders’ life sentences for the most serious crimes.
● Giving the death penalty for the most serious crimes (capital punishment).
2 examples of deterrence
● Giving mandatory
custodial sentences for certain offences e.g. firearm possession.
● Public shaming of
convicted offenders to deter others.
2 examples of rehabilitation
● Giving offenders community
orders to carry
out.
● Educational
programmes within prisons to improve opportunities when rejoining society.
2 examples of incapacitation
● Giving maximum security
custodial sentences for public protection.
● Use of solitary confinement
during custodial sentences to protect offender/others.
2 examples of reparation
● Giving offenders
community orders to carry out.
● Offenders and victims
participating in restorative justice.
how do prisons meet the aim of punishment using retribution
prisons take away an individuals liberty, sense of freedom and agency
helps the public feel a sense of justice
how dont prisons meet the aim of punishment using retribution (2 points)
• Living conditions in prisons are not great. Food in prison is not great. Hygiene in prison is not great
• Organisations such as the Prison Reform Trust have done activism for years trying to improve the conditions people live in, in prison
how do prisons meet the aim of punishment by deterrence
For most members of the population, the threat of going to prison and the ramifications of being convicted of a crime acts as a major deterrent against committing crime (general deterrence). Horror stories about the living conditions, and brutal subcultural norms of prison life is enough to scare most people into law-abiding
how don’t prisons meet the aims of punishment by deterrence
Prisons only work as an effective deterrent if people are: • Rational-thinking when they commit crimes
• Actually scared about prison life
how do prisons meet the aims of punishment through public protection (3 point)
• Undeniably prison is an effective way of incapacitating offenders - it can at times be used to literally incarcerate to protect the public (IPP sentences)
• In theory, putting people in prison gets them away from the public, and while under such strict surveillance, prisoners are prevented from committing more crimes
• Lengthy mandatory, discretionary and indeterminate sentences give the courts the power to keep people off the streets
how don’t prisons meet the aims of punishment through public protection
Some consider prisons ‘universities of crime’: • Gangs in prison
• Radicalisation in prison is a growing problem
• Drug dealing and use is getting worse (10.6% of random drug tests were positive in 2017/18 (HM Prison & Probation Service 2019)
what is an issue with prions for all 5 aims of punishment
an overarching issue is cost and funding. Prisons struggle to meet any of the aims of punishment due to how expensive it is to run them, and the lack of funding they have received from the government since 2010
what aims of punishment use imprisonment as a form of punishment
retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, incapacitation and reparation
what types of offences are community sentences usually for
are for minor offences, but not so minor that a fine or discharge will suffice eg. Assault, benefit fraud, vandalism