Topic 3 - Part 2: Decision making Under Risk And Uncertainty Flashcards

1
Q

……. theory is developed as an alternative to EUT to describe decision-making under uncertainty and risk by Khaneman and Tversky (1979).

A

Prospect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The overall value of an edited prospect, denoted .., is expressed in terms of two scales, .. and ..

A

V is expressed in terms of two scales, v and π

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The first scale, v, - ……. …….. - assigns to each outcome x a number, v(x), which reflects the subjective value of that outcome.
- Outcomes are defined relative to a reference point, which serves as the zero point of the value scale.

A

Value function

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The second scale, π, associates with each probability p a ………. ……. π(p), which reflects the impact of p on the overall value of the prospect.

A

Decision weight

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

An essential feature of the Prospect Theory is that the carriers of value are changes in wealth or welfare, rather than ….. ……

A

Final states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Changes are defined relative to a …….. …, which serves as a zero point of the value scale

A

Reference point

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The variable v measures the value of deviations from that reference point, i.e. …. … ……

A

Gains and losses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

It is often assumed in analysis that the relevant reference point for evaluating gains and losses is the current status of wealth or welfare, but this need not be the case. In particular, the relevant reference point may be the outcome that you ……. or feel entitled.

A

Expect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Loss aversion - the pain that one experiences in losing a sum of money appears to be …….. than the pleasure associated with gaining the same amount

A

Greater

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The aversiveness of symmetric fair bets generally ………. with the size of the stake. As the size of the stake goes up people are less likely to take it due to loss aversion

A

Increases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How to measure the extent of loss aversion? What is the smallest gain that I need to balance and equal change to lose, say, $100?
For many people, the answer is about $200. The loss aversion ratio is here

A

2.0, the loss aversion ratio has been estimated in experiments and is usually in the range of 1.5 to 2.5 (on average).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The value function for losses is …… than the value function for gains

A

Steeper

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

In prospect theory, the value of each outcome is ………. by a decision weight

A

Multiplied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Decision weights measure the …… of events on the desirability of prospects, and not merely the perceived likelihood of these events.

A

Impact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

subcertainty captures an essential element of peoples
attitudes to uncertain events, namely that the sum of the
weights associated with complementary events is typically
…. than the weight associated with the certain event.

A

less

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

People overstate ….. probabilities and understate ….. probabilities.

A

small / high

17
Q

In expected utility theory the basic objects of preference are ……. .. …… (including non-monetary resources like health).

A

states of wealth

18
Q

In expected utility theory the utility function is …. ….. everywhere. (Most theorists).

A

risk averse

19
Q

In expected utility theory …. ……… cannot be defined (expected utility theory does not identify a status quo).

A

loss aversion

20
Q

In expected utility theory people evaluate probabilities ……….

21
Q

In expected utility theory problem description should have no effect as long as the problem is logically the ….

22
Q

In prospect theory, the basic objects of preference are changes from a …….. ………. …… (gains and losses).

A

neutral reference point

23
Q

In prospect theory, the value function is risk …….. for gains, risk ……… for losses

A

averse / seeking

24
Q

In prospect theory, the value function implies …. ……..

A

loss aversion

25
Q

In prospect theory, people evaluate probabilities ………….

A

nonlinearly

26
Q

In prospect theory, problem description can change the reference level; hence the definition of ….. … …… can change.

A

gains and losses

27
Q

An investor must choose how long to leave his investments before he evaluates how they are doing. We call this length of time the ………… …….

A

evaluation period

28
Q

The volatility of a risky asset can make it undesirable for
someone who is …. ……, even if the overall returns are
high

A

loss averse

29
Q

In financial markets, investors prefer to sell stocks that will give them a realised gain (the stocks were sold for more than you paid for them) than to sell stocks that will give them a realised loss (the stocks were sold for less than you paid for them). This is called the ………… ……..

A

disposition effect

30
Q

The investor has set up an account for each share that she
bought, and she wants to close every account as a gain. A
rational agent would have a comprehensive view of the
portfolio and …. the stock that is least likely to do well in
the future, without considering whether it is a winner or a
loser

31
Q

Break-even effect - Risk aversion seems to …….. after
earlier expectations have been shattered by opening
high-value briefcases. (In deal or no deal)
Like horse race bettors who bet on long shots at the
end of the game to try to break even before they go
home.

32
Q

House-money effect - risk aversion seems to
………. after earlier expectations have been surpassed by
opening low-value briefcases. (In deal or no deal).
The house money effect forecasts that investors are
more prone to buy higher-risk stocks after a pro table
trade.