Topic 3: Labour Supply and Public Policy Flashcards

Analyze labour supply effects of different government programs, collectively known as income support programs: Government Grants Welfare Negative Income Tax Wage Subsidy Earned Income Tax Credit Analyze empirical evidence of public policy effects: Randomized Control Trial Approach: The Self-Sufficiency Project Difference-in-Difference Approach: EITC Expansion

1
Q

What’s a government grant?

A
  • Lump sum transfer from the government.
  • Generally subject to certain eligibility criteria, e.g. single parents, persons over 60, families…
  • Examples:
  1. Old Age Security (OAS): Monthly payments to people over 65
  2. Conditional Cash Transfers (CCT): common in developing countries; given to parents conditional on sending their kids to school, for example.
  3. Basic Income: Unconditional transfer to all residents
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How does a government grant affect the budget line and preference?

A
  1. It shifts budget line outwards.
  2. Government Grant = pure income effect Increase both consumption & leisure, decrease hours worked
  3. Increase reservation wage: MRS= G/L
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

True or False? A government grant increases consumption but less than what the grant dictates because there’s a reduction in working hours?

A

True. Remember C=w(T-L)+G. we assume YN=0 for all public policies. Therefore, L will reduce G’s impact because reducing L results in reduced working hours which results in reduced C.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What’s the purpose of traditional welfare?

A

Guarantees minimum level of income. Eligible for welfare if income falls below defined threshold. -Threshold varies by province and other characteristics, including family type.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the traditional welfare scheme?

A

Traditional welfare scheme:

  • Guaranteed level of income: benefits equal to G when person works zero hours.
  • Benefits reduced 1 for 1 with earnings.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the effects of a traditional welfare scheme in terms of reservation wage, encouragement to work and social burden?

A

Effects of traditional welfare scheme:

Increases reservation wage

Discourages individuals from working for wage at which they might otherwise be willing to work a positive amount of hours.

May have more people on welfare than is socially optimal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What might reduce the number of people on welfare?

A
  • Reduced welfare benefits
  • Increaseing the wage rate
  • Changing preferences
  • Reduce implicit tax rate

Costs and benefits associated with each.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What`s the difference between negative income tax and traditional welfare

A

Like welfare, a guaranteed minimum income.

  • BUT earned income does not reduce benefits 1 for 1.
  • Benefits reduced by t for every dollar earned.

If your income is below a threshold B, you receive a transfer of G − tE from the government, where E is the gross income earned from working: E = w(T − L).

If you have no earnings (E = 0), you receive G from the government but the higher your earnings E, the lower the transfer you receive.

Once your labour earnings reach the threshold B, the subsidy disappears completely.

Assuming YN = 0, the budget constraint is given by:

C = w(T − L) if E > B

C = w(T − L) + G − tw(T − L) = (1 − t)w(T − L) + G if E < B

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the effects of the negative income tax on Leisure, employment and potential side-effects on labour market

A

Net wage is lower, so there is a substitution effect pushing for ↑ L. At the same time, total income is higher, so there is an income effect also pushing for ↑ L.

Negative income tax reduces employment relative to no welfare I But it reduces employment less than traditional welfare scheme.

Potential downsides: More expensive for government than traditional welfare? Larger payouts?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the formula for the negative income tax budget constraint?

A
  1. C= w(T-L) + G-tW(T-L)

The highlighted portion represent labour earnings, the unhighlighted portion represent government transfer.

  1. C= (1-t)W(T-L) + G
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Define wage subsidies

A

In wage subsidies, governments provide funds proportional to people’s earnings or a transfer of S for every dollar earned.

S = wage subsidy → percentage top-up from government.

Effective earnings rate becomes (1 + S)W

It’s intended to encourage people to work more.

Net income: Y = (1 + S)W(T -L)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the formula for net income during a wage subsidy?

A

Net income: Y = (1 + S)W(T -L)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the effects of a wage subsidy in terms of substition and income effects?

A

Overall effects are ambigious.

Substitution effect: encourages people to work more because of price of leisure increases

Income effect: encourages people to work less. e.g wealthier want to increase leisure

May encourage entry of non-participants.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is an Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) ?

A

The EITC is a US program designed to reduce the number of people on welfare. It is similar to the Working Income Tax Benefit (WITB) in Canada.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the 3 key characteristics of the EITC/WITB program?

A
  1. “Phase-in”: wage subsidy at low levels of income.
  2. “Flat Range”: After a certain income threshold, wage subsidy stops, but accrued subsidy does not have to be paid back.
  3. “Phase-out”: After a further income threshold, there is a “phase-out” period where the additional earnings are taxed to recover the cost of the subsidy.
17
Q

What is the difference between the EITC/WITB and the traditional welfare scheme?

A
18
Q

What types of relationships do the following represent:

  1. Cancer and Mobile phones
  2. Anxiety and Job performance
  3. Class size and Student performance
A
  1. Reverse causation
  2. Bidirectional causation
  3. Confounding factors

A fourth possible relationship is coincidence

These are all correlational relationships

19
Q

Describe a counterfactual.

A

A counterfactual considers individuals exposed to a certain program. The question of interest is: how would they have fared in the absence of a program?

Alternatively, we could consider those not exposed to the program and considered how they would have fared if they were exposed to the program.

Counterfactuals are intrinsically unobservable. At a given point, an individula is either exposed to the program or not.

20
Q
A
21
Q

Describe potential counterfacutuals.

A

It compares outcomes for the group of people who recieved treatment to the outcomes of those who do not and or looks at the same individual before and after treatment.

22
Q

What are the issues with potential counterfactuals two forms?

A
  1. Those exposed to the program and those who aren’t will generally be different along a number of dimensions.
  • Focused program (e.g poorer/richer areas)
  • Eligibility requirements
  • Individuals who choose to participate find it optimal to do so (self-selections)

​Therefore: those who aren’t exposed to a treatment are often poor comparison (inappropriate counterfactual). Not clear whether differences between the groups are due to pre-existing differences or to the impact of the program.

  1. Changes over time for a given individual may be affected by many factors other than the treatment of interest. Its not clear whether changes over time are due to other factors that are changing or to the impact of the program.

**Look at notes for examples**

23
Q

What are the two ways economist address issues of gathering evidence of income support programs?

A
  1. Randomized Control Trials
  2. Difference in Difference (DID)
24
Q

Describe RCTs. There are five key points.

A
  • Randomized control trials randomly allocate individual to treatment and control groups.
  • Compare the outcomes after treatment across two groups.
  • Due to randomization, the control group should be identical to the treatment group in every respct, other than the reciept ot treatment.
  • Therefore, the control group will be a goos counterfactual for the treatment group.
  • Difference between the two groups can be interpreted as the causal effet of the treatment; no confounding should be present.

Look at notes for examples!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

25
Q

What are potential issues with RCTs? 5 points

A

A. imperfect compliance: those randomly selected for treatment may not actually be treated (due to opt-outs, implementations issues, etc)

B. Externalities: the treatment may indirectly impact the control group.

C. Attrition (people stop answering the survey)

D. External validity

E. Feasibility and Ethical Issue

26
Q

Describe Difference in Difference

A
  • Compare change over time for a treatment group relative to a (carefully chosen) control group
  • In the absence of a randomized experiment, treatment is not randomly allocated and therefore the treatment and control group may differ from the outset for reasons other than the treatment
  • But, the key assumption for DiD is that these pre-existing differences are stable over time
  • In the absence of treatment, the changes over time for the treatment and the control group would have been the same
  • Any differential change over time can therefore be attributed to the treatment
  • Crucial to choose a control group for which this assumption is reasonable – choice is not obvious, unlike in RCTs
27
Q

What are the formulas for DID?

A

For the first formula the effect come to (change due to treatment + change that would occur w/o treatment) - (change w/o treatment)

For the second formula below the, it comes to (pre-existing difference + impact of policy) - ( pre-existing difference)

** Look at example presented in notes**