topic 3 Flashcards
Overview of criminal procedure
- Entry of judge; introduction of barristers; accused enters and plea to charges
- Opening addresses
by prosecution then defence - Prosecution calls each of its witnesses
1. Examination in chief
2. Cross- examination
3. Re-examination
Defence calls each of its witnesses
1. Examination in chief
2. Cross- examination
3. Re-examination
- Closing submissions by prosecution then
defence
Judge ‘charges’ the jury
(gives jury their instructions)
Jury returns with verdict
overview of pre-trial procedure
- Initial investigation, arrest, charging of accused
- Further investigation, collection of evidence
- Committal, plea
- Trial
arrest,
By legal authority and take someone into custody.
charge
To formally accuse someone of committing a crime
evidance
any physical or verbal evidence that is presented in order to prove that a crime was committed or not committed.
commital hearing
The purpose of a committal hearing is to find out if there is enough evidence to put the accused person on trial with a judge and jury.
where does the commital hearing occur?
the Magistrates’ Court
role of the judge
Their role is to interpret the law, assess the evidence and control how hearings and trials are conducted.
examination in chief,
Examination-in-chief involves a witness being asked questions by the party that has called them.
cross-examination,
the formal interrogation of a witness called by the other party
re-examination
occurs when the party that called a witness wishes to ask them further questions after they have been subjected to cross-examination.
hearsay
Hearsay is an out-of-court statement, where an individual is not under oath and therefor it is inadmissable in trial as it may not be true fact.
improperly obtained
the police should not be able to threaten people to make them confess to crimes
people should know their rights before they answer any questions
police should only conduct searches in accordance with the law
irrelevant evidance
Information that is not material to the matters or facts in the case
Evidence requiring expertise from a non-expert witness
One restriction is that regular people (people without specialist knowledge or training) should not be asked questions requiring specialist training or knowledge to answer