Topic 2 Flashcards
Balogun v AG Ogun
Element of stealing
Oloye v State
Use of threat of use of force
Henry Oti v State
Robbing a woman
Adepoju v State
House robbery
Adejobi v State
Bankers, no violence, stealing
Ajayi v State
Violence could be to a person or property
Njuguna v Republic
Immediately after or before
R v Hemmings
Bonafide claim of right😂
R v Robinson
Bonafide, husband and wife
R v Onuegbe
One of the thieves had a machete
Majekodunmi v State
Element of armed robbery
Kareem v State
Filling station, one of them had a gun
Offor v State
Armed robbery
Maba v State
Same
Nwachukwu v State
Toy gun is not an offensive weapon
Dibie v State
Toy gun is sufficient.
R v Smith
Burglary is at night
R v Boyle
Constructive breaking in
R v Chandler
Key, duplicate, servant,
Njani v Republic
No break in where the door is met open
R v Apesi
Least entry is sufficient. Finger
R v Davis
Butiti v Republic
No entry, no housebreaking
Onukwebe v State
Element of robbery
R v Gardner
Intent must be at the time of breaking in
R v Rose
A cabin could be a dwelling house
R v Halloran
“for the time being” temporariness
Akindipe v State
Element of demanding with menace
Utteh v State
Demand could be parol or based on conduct
Osidola v COP
Wada v IGP
Omotosho v COP
The threat need not to have operated on the mind of the victim… The decision is however in error of this principle.
R v Cunningham
The two meaning of malice
- Intent
- Recklessly without concern of the outcome
Make v State
Followed the decision in Cunningham
O’Day v the State
Wilful equals malicious.
Atano v Attorney General, AG of Bendel State, (1988) 2 NWLR (Pt. 75) 201
A group of bank officials set the financial department of the bank on fire in order to conceal the money they had misappropriated. They also destroyed record books. Proof of arson was inferred from the circumstances of the case.
Okhira v State
Thing set on fire need not to get completely burnt
