Topic 2 Flashcards
geometry study (interleaving)
RQ: How does blocked practice compare to interleaved practice for learning geometry?
M:
1. participants study for 2 weeks
2. take a test 1 week after studying
C: blocked practice vs interleaved practice
- blocked = AAABBBCCC
- interleaved = ABCBBACCAB
R: (during practice) - blocked group did better during practice b/c they can repeat procedures easier
(final test): blocked dropped down 60% and interleave improved
A: Interleave gives us a stable understanding of how much knowledge we know before the test AND its a better way to practice cause its CONSISTENT
Complex Motor Skills Study (interleave)
RQ: How does blocked practice compare to interleaved practice for learning motor skills?
M: Participants learn to act out different movements; 10 days after they take a final test.
C: 2x2 design study method x testing method (both are just blocked and random practice/testing)
R(practice)-B(testing), B-B, R-R, B(practice)-R(testing).
R: (practice session): blocked practice group is more successful than random practice.
R:(10 days later - final test): B-B and R-R did about the same (in the middle), B-R did the worse, R-B did the BEST!
A: interleaving practice is always best even if your test is blocked and it gives longer term knowledge
High school students - Why Does Interleaving Work?
RQ: 1. How does blocked practice compare to interleaved practice for learning geometry?
2. What kinds of mistakes do students make based on how they practice?
M: 1. Participants learn to compute different attributes of prisms
2. Take a test 1 DAY after studying
C: blocked practice vs interleaved practice
- all participants tested with a random test
R (during studying): Blocked group slayed and interleave did well but not better
R (tested 1 day after): blocked group dropped soooo much and interleave stayed about the same
Errors: Fabrication errors - forgetting what you know so you make it up.
Discrimination errors - use wrong formula
R of errors: fabrication error was about equal for both groups. Blocked group made so many discrimination errors
A: interleave provides stable feedback about performance. Forces you to practice identifying the type of problem and associated solution - memory and critical thinking
Permastore
RQ: How long does memory last in long term storage?
M: tested over 700 ppl who had taken Spanish in high school up to 50 years prior
- groupings: participants had different number of courses and different grade levels
R: (early forgetting) - 0 to 5 years you forget a lot. (permastore) 5-25 years we remember a lot even without additional practice. (late forgetting) 30-50+ years you forget again
A: without additional practice we are able to remember a lot
Classic Spacing Study
RQ: Does the spacing of study session impact retention in the long term?
M: participants study for a test -> 6 practice sessions in total
3 groups:
1. no spacing/cramming (6 times in 1 day)
2. low spacing (every day for 6 days)
3. high spacing (every 30 days for 6 months)
Final test is 30 days after last session
R (before test 30 days later, this is from practice tests right after studying): no spacing did best, then low spacing, then high spacing did bad.
R(final test 30 days later): high spacing did the best, then low spacing did next best and pretty good, then no spacing did bad and lost a lot of knowledge.
A: if you want to remember something for a long time just study it once a month
Note: the spacing of the study sessions, in terms of how much time there was between consecutive sessions
short vs long format courses
RQ: does the spacing of a course impact long term learning outcomes
M/C: students enrolled in the same course but one was 8 weeks (short format) and the other 6 months (long format.
tested at two points: 1. midway through the course
2. immediately after the course
R (during the course and after the course); 6-month/long-term format did way better
A: high spacing is best!
optimal study gap
RQ: what is the best gas between 2 study sessions?
initial study session –> (study gap)—> restudy session –> (retention interval) –> final test
M: 1. study for a test (learn 32 facts)
2. after a certain study gap, they study again
- asked twice about each fact with feedback
3. after a certain retention interval, they take a final test
C: 1. different study gaps (study gap in days)
2. different retention interval (tested in x amount of days later)
R: with time we forget things, but forgetting isn’t linear. using optimal study gap 64% increase in performance relative to cramming. Studying again too early led to worse long-term outcomes. How often we study depends on how much later the test is. 20% of RI is ideal. Divide the time between now and the test by 6 to get your optimal study gap.
the exponential value of studying
- people with the 1 year retention interval did poorly in the optimal spacing gap study
- but people in the permastore study were able to remember much more even 20 years later…
(if your test is in 30 days, you should study at least once every 5 days)
- this suggests that we can study less frequently while our memory stays consistent
- regular and repeated studying of material over time leads to slower forgetting!!!