Topic 1: Theories of religion Flashcards
Functional definitions
In terms of social/psychological functions for individuals.
Durkheim- contribution made to social integration
Yinger- functions for individuals, ultimate questions
Inclusive.
Social constructionist definitions
How members of society define religion
Universal definition not possible
Aldridge- Scientology is religion to its followers but governments have sought to ban it. Shows definitions can be contested and influenced.
Durkheim’s functions of religion
The sacred and the profane- worshipping society itself, unites believers into single moral community
Totemism- Arunta, Australian Aboriginal tribe
The collective conscience- rituals reinforce this and remind us of the power of society
Cognitive functions- Gives us categories needed to reason and think conceptually. Allow us to communicate.
Worsley
Durkheim criticism- no sharp division between sacred and profane. If he is right about tote sim it does not prove the essence of all religions has been discovered.
Mestrovic
Durkheim criticism- ideas cannot be applied to contemporary society as diversity has fragmented the collective conscience
Malinowski
Psychological functions for individuals:
- Where outcome is important but uncontrollable (e.g. Trobriand Islanders- lagoon/ocean fishing- canoe magic)
- At times of life crisis- minimises disruption e.g. Funeral reinforce solidarity among survivors and immortality denies the fact of death
Parsons
Values and meaning:
legitimates society’s norms and values by sacralising them; promoting value consensus and social stability.
Provides ultimate source of meaning- answers ultimate questions. Helps people accept dire events that make live appear meaningless and could undermine commitment to society’s values, maintaining stability
Bellah
Civil religion- attaches sacred qualities to society itself e.g. Americanism
Binds together people of many different ethnic and religious backgrounds
Functional alternative- other beliefs and practices That can perform the same functions of shared values and social cohesion as organised religion for society
Criticisms of functionalism
Neglects negative aspects- oppression of poor and women
Ignores religion as a source of division and conflict- how can it unite with religious pluralism?
Civil religion is not really a religion
Marx
Religion as ideology- distorts perception of reality to serve ruling class interests. Ideological weapon to legitimate suffering as inevitable and god-given. Ideas create a false consciousness- a distorted view of reality preventing poor from acting to change situation Legitimates power and privilege of dominant class by making it seem divinely ordinated
Alienation- workers do not own what they produce, monogamy of process
Religion therefore acts as the ‘opium of the people’ to dull the pain of exploration
Lenin
Religion is a ‘spiritual gin’ doled out to the masses to confuse them and keep them in their place, creating a ‘mystical fog’ that obscures reality.
Criticisms of Marxism
Ignores positive functions. Neo-Marxism sees certain forms of religion as assisting not hindering class consciousness Other Marxist Althusser rejects the concept of alienation as unscientific. Abercrombie and Turner- religion does not necessarily function effectively as an ideology to control the population- in pre-capitalist society Christianity had limited impact on the peasantry.
Armstrong
Women’s exclusion from the priesthood of most religions is evidence of their marginalisation. Religious organisations are male dominated despite women often participating more than men.
Early religions often placed women at the centre (e.g. Earth mother goddesses, fertility cults and female priesthoods) However the rise of monotheistic religions saw the establishment of ansingle all powerful male God.
Holm
Places of worship segregate the sexes and female participation is restricted. Taboos regrading mensturation, pregnancy and childbirth as polluting also prevent participation. Holm describes this as the devaluation of women in contemporary religion.
El Saadawi
Religion is not the cause of female subordination, but as a result of patriarchal society patriarchy began to influence and reshape religion, and men reshaped beliefs in ways that favoured patriarchy. Thus, religion now continues to women’s oppression.
Agreeing with Armstrong, El Saadawi sees the rise of monotheism as legitimating men’s power over women