Topic 1 Flashcards

1
Q

Define criminal law

A

Criminal law is the branch of national law that defines certain forms of human conduct as crimes and provides for the punishment of those persons with criminal capacity who unlawfully and with a guilty mind commit a crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is branch of law is criminal law?

A

Criminal law is a substantive public law that deals with the creation, operation and extension of rights and duties between the state and the individuals. This is because the state has an overarching interest in the safety of individuals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is criminal procedure and evidence?

A

Criminal procedure and evidence is procedural law which regulates the enforcement of substantive law such as criminal law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the branch of of law is delict?

A

Substantive private law that involves two individuals engaged in a legal dispute and want the court to assert their respective rights, such as delict.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What law governs a crimainl trial?

A

If a person is charged in court with having committed a crime, the trial is governed by the
rules of criminal procedure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Which parties are involved in a criminal case?

A
  • The state is the complainant
  • The victim who the crime was committed against
  • The accused
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which parties are involved in a delict case?

A

the individual who lays the complaint, they are the plaintiff
they lay a claim against the defendant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the prupose of a delict case and a crimainal case?

A

The purpose of a criminal case is punishment. While in delict compensation the main purpose is compensation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What will hapen in a criminal case if the victim refuses to prosecute?

A

In a criminal case, the state will need to prosecute regardless of the victim’s desire if there is adequate objective evidence to do so, this is a technical general rule. However, in practice, if the victim isn’t willing to cooperate it is unlikely that the case will be successful.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the burden of proof in criminal law?

A

The burden of proof in Criminal law is beyond a reasonable doubt, they have to prove all elements of criminal liability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Who is the fine paid to in a criminal case?

A

If a fine is paid in a criminal case it is paid to the state not the victim, however in delict this is paid to the victim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How can the defence show a case is not beyond a reasonable doubt?

A

If the defence can show that another possibility exists that the version presented isn’t the most probable version then the state hasn’t proven it beyond a reasonable doubt.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Can a conduct be both a crime and delict?

A

A conduct can be both a crime and a delict, this can be seen through assault. When the individual wishes to claim financially for the pain and suffering as well as laying a charge of assault.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the principle res judicata?

A

A person cannot be held liable for the same issue twice as stated in the principle of Res judicata, this means that the cause of action against two people has to be different even if it came from the same conduct.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Where is res judicata codified?

A

Res judicata is codified in section 35(3)(m) of the Constitution, a person cannot be held guilty of the same crime twice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the absolute theory of punishment?

A

The Absolute theory of punishment is that punishment is the end of justice. Under it is there is the restribution theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the retribution theory?

A

Retribution theory- states that through the offender’s punishment, we restore the legal order. In the retributive theory, the degree of punishment must be in proportion to the degree of harm and an expression of society’s condemnation of the crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is the relative theory?

A

The Relative theory of punishment is that punishment has a broader reason for the punishment. Punishment is only a means to a bigger purpose.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What theroies are under the relative theory?

A

Prevention theory, Individual deterrence, General deterrence theory and the reformation/rehabilitation theory

20
Q

What is the reformation/rehabilitation theory?

A

Reformation/rehabilitation theory- Automatically excludes life sentences and the death penalty. We reform them with the view that they will enter society and not re-offend. This is usually high for juveniles or people with lesser offences, as they are more likely to break bad habits. this could be done through specific programs

21
Q

What is the general deterrence theory?

A

General deterrence theory- If one person is punished for a crime it can prevent another potential criminal from breaking the crime, the success is on how probable it is that an offender will be caught, convicted and serve out his sentence.

22
Q

What is Individual deterrence theory?

A

Individual deterrence- to teach the person convicted of a crime a lesson which will deter him from committing crimes in the future. Through punishment, the offender is deterred from committing further crimes. Undermined in SA by reoffence rate which is at 90%

23
Q

What is the prevention theory?

A

Prevention theory- states are punished to stop the crime from happening again

24
Q

Which punishment thoery is used in SA?

A

SA legal systems use the combination theory, which applies each theory when dealing with crimes.

25
Q

What are the four key considerations that must be taen into account when umposing a sentence?

A

Four key considerations must be taken into account when imposing a sentence, the crime, the criminal, the interests of the community and the interests of the victim as seen in Matyityi SA case

26
Q

What are the main two principles of legality?

A

The principle of legality is in favour of liberty, it states that there would be no crime without law (Nullem crimen sine lege) or no punishment without law (nullem poena sine lege).

27
Q

What is the components Ius acceptum of principles of legality?

A

Ius acceptum- the accused conduct must be accepted and recognised as a crime by society

28
Q

What is the components Ius paevium of principles of legality?

A

Ius paevium- the accrued conduct must be prohibited at the time of the commission of the crime

29
Q

What is the components Ius certum of principles of legality?

A

Ius certum - A crime should be certain and must not be formulated vaguely

30
Q

What is the components Ius strictuim of principles of legality?

A

Ius strictuim - When a crime is vague it should be narrowly defined to give certain to the principle of favourem libertas (the favour of liberty)

31
Q

What is the components nalla poena of principles of legality?

A

Nalla poena- When convicted the sentencing should be clear

32
Q

What is the significance of the five components of the principles of legality?

A
  1. Criminal law must be accessible
  2. The definition of crimes must be clear and settled
  3. Statuary offences should be created in express terms so that it is clear what the statute is trying to criminallies
  4. Punishment can only be pursued for crimes created and that existed before the violation of the crime, as seen in section 35(3)(l) of the Constitution
33
Q

Where is the principles of legality codified?

A

The principles of legality are codified in the rights of arrested, detained and accused persons are set out in s 35 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996.

34
Q

What does section 35(3)(h) of the Constitution state?

A

S 35(3)(h) of the Constitution is the right to be presumed innocent, to remain silent and not to testify during proceedings is part of the right to a fair trial

35
Q

What was the facts of DPP v Masiya?

A

In DDP v Masiya, Mr Masiya was charged with raping a small girl anally, however, at the time of this case the common law definition of rape was a male penis into a female vagina unlawful without consent anal rape was charged as indecent assault.

36
Q

What was the outcome of DPP v Masiya as stated in the magistrate court?

A

The magistrate stated he was charged with rape, therefore extending the definition of rape to include anal rape on females specifically, the reasoning was seen that Mr Masiya knew his act was wrong whether he knew where penetration was.

37
Q

What was the outcome of DPP v Masiya as stated in the CC?

A

The CC found that the extended version of the common law definition of rape only applied prospectively and as stated in section 35(3)(l) of the Constitution that shows an accused person cannot be charged with an offence if at the time it didn’t constitute an offence. Further, at the time Mr Masiya anally penetrated the little girl it wasn’t rape but indecent assault and it is only after this case the development applies. The judge stated that to charge Mr Masiya with rape would undermine the principle of legality as seen in section 35(3)(l) and he was charged with indecent assault

38
Q

What was held in Veldman in regards to retrospective crimes?

A

In Veldman, Nkabinde J concluded that it would be unfair, and indeed unconstitutional, to convict the accused of an offence in circumstances where the conduct in question did not constitute an offence at the time of commission

39
Q

What is the Ius praevium principle?

A

Ius praevium principle to punishment is that a person can only be found guilty of a crime if the act was recognised as a criminal offence at the time it was committed

40
Q

What was held in section 35(3)(n) in the Constitution?

A

Section 35(3)(n) of the Constitution provides that the right to a fair trial includes the right to the benefit of the least severe of the prescribed punishments if the prescribed punishment for the offence has been changed between the time that the offence was committed and the time of sentencing.

41
Q

What are the two things that need to be met for criminal liability to be met?

A
  • Actus Reus- Conative elements. This deals with the act or conduct
  • Mens Rea- Cognitive elements. This deals with the mind of the accused
42
Q

What is actus reus elements subdivided into?

A
  • Conduct- Commission positive conduct, an omission or a failure to act or a state of affairs that deals with the
  • Voluntariness- This needs to be controlled by your own conscious will
  • Causation- this must be factually linked to the crime
  • Unjust or unlawfulness - This looks at whether an action is unlawful or not.
43
Q

What are justified defences in Actus reus?

A

Justified defences: Private defence, Necessity, Consent, Impossibility, Superior orders, Public authority and De minimus non curat lex (the law doesn’t deal with trivial matters)

44
Q

What is mens reus elements subdivided into?

A
  • Capacity insight- the ability to appreciate what wrong
  • Capacity self-control- the persons must be available to act on this appreciation
  • Fault Intention (dolus eventualis)- this is foresight of a real possibility and reconciled with this eventuality
  • Negligence (culpa)- When you fall short of a reasonable man standard
45
Q

What can Mens rea elements of capacity be detoured by?

A

Capacity can be detoured by:
- Youth
- Insanity
- Intoxication
- Severe emotional distress such as provocation or circumstances

46
Q

What are the requirements of the actus reus?

A
  • There must be an act or an omission;
  • Committed by a human or through the agency of an animal [Eustace/Fernandez];
  • The act or omission must be unlawful;
  • It must be voluntary;
  • There must be a causal link between the conduct and the unlawful consequence.