Topic 01- Technology Flashcards
a- What is a function?
Something that transforms input into output
What is a production function?
Way to describe technology- tells us how many units of output (production) can be produced at most for a given amount of input (FOP)
What does the following notation mean:
K
L
q
f
K- capital
L- labour
q- quantity
f- production function
How do you denote a production function and what does it mean?
q = f(K,L)
The maximum amount of output (q) that can be produced by inputs/factors of production (K and L)
When do you typically have a fixed factor?
In the short run
What occurs in the short run as a result of the fixed factor?
Law of diminishing marginal returns
Define marginal product of labour and marginal product of capital
Extra product generated by 1 extra unit of labour keeping all other factors (FOP) constant
Extra product generated by 1 extra unit of capital keeping all other factors (FOP) constant
How do you denote marginal product of labour?
MPL (but small capital L bottom right)
How do you graphically show a basic production function?
Have labour (L) on the horizontal axis and quantity produced/output (q) on the vertical axis
Show a slow increase in quantity for the increase in labour but gradually show the graph becoming more steep until the graph reaches its steepest point- the graph then starts to become less steep until it reaches its maximum point after which point the function begins to decline (SEE IMAGE IN NOTES)
How is the marginal product of labour significant graphically?
It is the slope/gradient of the production function
What is important to remember about the word marginal?
It will represent the gradient of something else
How can you algebraically display marginal product of labour (MPL- small L)?
MPL (small L) = change in quantity/change in labour
… MPL = delta (triangle) quantity/delta labour
REMEMBER delta labour = 1 as seeing affect on quantity of increasing labour by 1 unit at a time
MPL = dq/dL = slope or gradient of the production function
How can you graphically display the marginal product of labour curve and how does it relate to the production function?
MPL (small L) curve increases fairly constantly until it reaches its peak (when the production function curve is steepest)
It then falls fairly constantly until 0 (x-axis) whilst remaining positive (showing that the production function continues to rise at a decreasing rate)
When the MPL curve intersects the x-axis the production reaches its maximum point which has a gradient of 0
The MPL curve then becomes negative at which point the production function begins to fall
b- Which 2 inputs/FOP are substitutes and give an example?
Capital (K) and labour (L)
E.g. 5 units of labour spray painting a car can be replaced by 5 machines
What is one way in which we can show how a firm can produce the same amount of quantity but using different amounts of labour and capital?
An isoquant (set of all combinations of inputs that lead to same level of output)- curve which literally means constant/same (iso) quantity (quant)
A firm can produce on the line using varying amounts of capital and labour
NOTE curve must be INWARDS facing and cannot be outwards facing in order to comply with diminishing returns to a fixed factor (further reasoning explained on another card)
Are capital and labour always substitutes?
No- as sometimes labour (workers) needs to operate capital (machinery) and … the same amount of quantity cannot be produced if there is a different number of labour to machinery- e.g. 5 trench diggers need 5 units of labour in order to operate … they are complimentary
What are the conditions/observations of isoquants?
1) Points on the same isoquant (curve) produce the same quantity- each isoquant shows a different quantity/output
2) Isoquants are thin- if thick then shows that higher capital and labour produces same quantity which isn’t true- SEE NOTES FOR IMAGE
3) Isoquants must slope downwards- if it is thin but it slopes upwards then it shows that a higher amount of labour and capital produces the same amount of quantity which isn’t true- SEE NOTES FOR IMAGE
4) The further Isoquants are to the north east, the higher quantity/output they produce- Isoquants to the top right have higher capital and labour … more output
5) 2 different Isoquants with different production levels cannot cross- the point of intersection would indicate that the same amount of capital and labour produces 2 different quantities which isn’t possible
6) Every point has an isoquant that goes through it BUT not all are drawn- there is an isoquant for every quantity producible
What is the technical term for when the gradient of the slope of an isoquant determines the substitutability of labour for capital and how is it denoted?
Marginal rate of technical substitution of labour for capital- MRTSLK(LK small)
What would you notice about the substitutability (if you had capital (K) on the vertical axis and labour (L) on the horizontal axis) with varying gradient slopes of an isoquant?
More vertical slope = if you’re initially producing a quantity on an isoquant with a fair bit of capital and fairly little labour (top left) then it will be possible to reduce capital by quite a large amount and only employ some workers to continue producing along the same isoquant and … the same quantity
More horizontal slope = if you’re initially producing a quantity on an isoquant with a fair bit of capital and fairly little labour (top left) then it will be possible to reduce capital by quite a small amount but you would need to employ many more workers to continue producing along the same isoquant and … the same quantity
How do you generally calculate the marginal rate of technical substitution of labour for capital (MRTSLK)- small LK?
Work out the gradient of the slope/isoquant SO THAT WE MAINTAIN THE SAME QUANTITY- I.e produce along the same isoquant
… MRTSLK (small LK) = change in capital K/ change in labour L- so that same quantity produced
In practice how would you go about calculating MRTSLK (small LK)?
1) Calculate change in K (capital) = MPK (small K) * –Change in K (negative as capital falls)
2) Calculate change in L (labour) = MPL (small L) * Change in L
3) Equate change in labour with change in capital as total change in production is 0- as on same isoquant producing same quantity- so change in labour should be equal to the change in capital (remember delta K and delta L will most likely not equal each other … they can be equated because of most likely differing values of MPK and MPL- overall the effect is the same as the quantity is constant hence why they are equal)
4) … –MPKchange in K = MPLchange in L
5) … by rearranging: change in K/change in L = –MPL/MPK … as MRTSLK = change in K/change in L, MRTSLK = –MPL/MPK
6) Lastly substitute your values for MPL and MPK into the formula created (remember the negative) and you will have a value for MRTSLK
Why must an isoquant bend inwards towards the origin (0)?
Doesn’t make sense
SEE WORD DOC PIC- see the MRTSLK (small LK) formula and the move along the isoquant to the right from A to B
To move from A to B, capital would fall and labour would increase in order to produce the same quantity along the isoquant. If labour was to increase then it is more likely that diminishing marginal returns to a fixed factor would occur and then the marginal product of labour (the quantity produced by each extra until of labour) would fall which is the numerator in the MRTSLK equation.
At the same time capital would fall and therefore it is less likely that diminishing marginal returns would occur and therefore the marginal product of capital (the quantity produced by each extra until of capital) would increase which is the denominator in the MRTSLK equation.
… as a whole the MRTSLK (small LK) becomes closer to 0 hence why it bends inwards towards the origin
What are the 3 main thought experiments we look at?
1) One fixed factor-> Law of diminishing marginal returns- short run
2) Substitutability- change 2 factors but in particular way so that quantity produced is the same and production continues to occur along the isoquant- increased one but compensated by decreasing the other
3) Returns to scale- long run- all factors/inputs variable
What is returns to scale?
Returns to scale- increase all factors (capital and labour both) by a factor greater than 1
All factors increased proportionally
What is increasing returns to scale?
When PRODUCT increases by a factor greater than the factor the inputs (capital and labour) increased by … product increased greater proportionally than capital and labour
What is constant returns to scale?
When PRODUCT increases by the same factor the inputs (capital and labour) increased by