Top Down Bottom Up Flashcards
What is Top Down and Bottom up?
Bottom up - Looks at longer - argues grass roots activists were more responsible than national leaders
Top Down- Short civil rights - national leaders impact
What does Harvard Sitkoff argue?
- CRM started during the 1929-39 Great Depression - AA unemployment tripled and spurred activism
- 1929 Chicago Whip editor Joseph Bibb organised boycotts of city department stores that refused to hire AA - Grassroot protests worked and 2000 AA employed
- By 1940 AA believed a page in American history had been turned
What protests were before Civil Rights?
- 1930s saw first meeting of National Negro Congress an umbrella movement of AA organisations that fought anti-lynching legislation, elimination of poll tax
- 1937 Southern Negro Youth Congress SNYC - registered voters and organised boycotts
- 1940 NAACP increased from 50,000 to 450000
What does Korsted argue started CRM?
early 1940 labour radicalism when lots moved to urban areas
- 1/2 million AA workers joined CIO union
What dies Fairclough say about such broad definitions of CRM?
- in stressing history’s web they turn history into homogenised mush, without sharp breaks and transformations
What does Hugh Murray say?
- Lpeople in the 1950-60 called it CRM so historians should not try to rename it
McCoy and Reutten say
- View WW2 as crucial
1940s ushered in a new age of race relations because war years loosened grio of white racism
What does Sitkoff and Finkle say about WW2 and 1940s
- Wasn’t a breakthrough
- Blacks didnt turn to A. Philip Randolphs programme of nonviolence - concessions like the Fair Employmen Practices Commission proved meaningless
- White supremacy snd segregation remained intact
What did Fairclough say about emergence of mass nonviolent direct action?
- Signalled start of a new struggle
- 1956 Montgomery Bus Boycott
what did A Morrison say about the movement?
The boycotts represented genesis of a new movement indigenous to the south, based on independent local centres
What doe some say about the problems of top down approach?
- By focussing on MLK biographies it generally obscures on the ground where the CRM derived its dynasism thus recen years see growth in local studies
What does S Lawson say about Top Down?
- It’s right
- The federal government play an indispensable role in shaping fortunes of CR
- Its impossible to understand how blacks achieved first class citizenship rights in the South without knowing what national leaders did to influence events leading to equality
- Also emphasises SC - Brown v Board
Whats C Payne view on Bottom up?
- It’s right
- analysis during WW2 - generation far more rigid and ordered = passed down then to Montgomery boycott
- Discussed grass roots organisations like SNNC (student nonviolent coordination committee) and CORE
- Course of movement was influenced by many people
- Argues it doesn’t dishonour MLK work but corrects history- Separate from Lawsons he clearly shows the importance of grassroots activists in CRM as without them there would be no national leadership