Top Down Approach Flashcards
What is the top down approach
An analysis of previous crimes creates a profile of a likely offender
Stage 1 of the top down approach
Profiling inputs: the data collected at this stage includes a description of the crime scene, background information about the victim and the details of the crime itself
Stage 2 of the top down approach
Decision process models: the profiler starts to make decisions about the data and organises it into meaningful patterns. Murder type, time factors and location factors are considered
Stage 3 of the top down approach
Crime assessment: the crime is classified as organised or disorganised
What is an organised offender?
Commits a planned crime and may engage in violent fantasies with the victim and is high in intelligence and socially competent
What is a disorganised offender?
The crime scene is left with many clues such as fingerprints. The offender is of lower intelligence and competence
Stage 4 of the top down approach
Crime profile: a profile is now constructed of the offender including their background, habits and beliefs
Stage 5 of the top down approach
Crime assessment: a written report is given to the investigating agency and people matching the description are evaluated
Stage 6 of the top down approach
Apprehension: if a suspect is aprehended, the entire profile-generating process is reviewed to check that at each stage the conclusions were legitimate
The top down approach: evaluation
- More than just two types of offender
- Top down is less scientific than bottom up
- Top down is limited
Evaluation: more than two types of offender
The behaviours that describe each of the organised and disorganised types are not mutually exclusive; a variety of combinations could occur in any given murder scene.This has prompted other researchers to propose more detailed typological models. For example, Holmes (1989) suggests there are four types of serial killer: visionary, mission, hedonistic and power/control. If there are more than two types of criminals, then it ultimately makes the profiling system less accurate.
Evaluation: how is the top up approach less scientific than the bottom up approach
The Top-down approach could be seen as a more intuitive approach to offender profiling, it often relies on the expertise of the profiler which is problematic as this raises issues of subjectivity. There is also a lack of background evidence to suggest why it works. Therefore this method of profiling could be criticised in terms of its credibility as it can be considered less scientific than the Bottom-up approach.
Evaluation: how is the top down approach limited
This method of profiling can only really be used in crimes of murder and rape. More common offences such as burglary do not lend themselves to profiling because the resulting crime reveals very little about the offender. This restricts it’s applicability, unlike geographic profiling (part of the bottom-up approach) which looks at the pattern of crime rather than the crime type, making it more versatile. This means that it is a limited approach to identifying a criminal.