TMP/SMX, Nitrofurantoin, Fosfomycin Flashcards

1
Q

missing slide 5

A

k

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

missing slide 6

A

k

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Resistance

A

1) overproduction of PABA
2) ↓ affinity of enzyme dihydrofolate synthetase for
sulfonamide
3) ↓ affinity of dihydrofolate reductase for trimethoprim
4) ↓ cell permeability (plasmid mediated)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole
(Cotrimoxazole) (TMP/SMX)

what effect together?

A

❑ fixed ratio oral or IV results in ideal serum ratio of 1:20
❑ (SS tablet 80mg TMP / 400 mg sulfamethoxazole)
(DS tablet 160mg TMP / 800 mg sulfamethoxazole)
❑ synergistic / bactericidal
❑ reduced risk of resistance

Effect of sum of them together is greater than sum of them alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

TMP/SMX Spectrum

gram postiitve

A

S. aureus 98% 2020 (99% 2014)
MRSA 94% 2020 (97% 2014)
CoNS 81% 2020 (74% 2014)
S. pneumoniae 86% 2020 (89% 2014), 74% 2011
• not effective against Streptococcal pharyngitis
caused by S. pyogenes
• (Not effective against enterococci)

Not as good as coagulase neg staph
Not as good for pneumoniae but still reasonable
Not good for pyogenes
Not good against group A strep SSTI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

TMP/SMX Spectrum

gram neg

A
❑ H. influenzae 67% 2020 (77% 2012)
❑ E.coli 79% 2020 (78% 2012)*
❑ K. pneumoniae 94% 2020 (96% 2012)
❑ Proteus mirabilis 82% 2020 (71% 2014)
❑ S. marcesens 100% 2020 (100% 2012)
❑ Enterobacter spp (87% 2020, 97% 2012)
❑ Acinetobacter 94% 2019 (UAH)
❑ Citrobacter freundii 90% 2020
❑ Stenotrophomonas maltophilia 98% 2020 (UAH)

❑ not effective against P. aeruginosa

AMP-C making SPICE-A organisms are treated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

TMP/SMX Spectrum

anaerobes?
without cell wall organisms?
fungi?

A

❑ Active against M. catarrhalis,L. monocytogenes, &
Legionella
❑ Not reliable against M. pneumoniae or Chlamydia
❑ Not active against anaerobes
❑ Active against Pneumocystis jiroveci and Nocardia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

TMP/SMX Pharmacokinetics

IV or oral?
metabolized by CYP?

A

❑ well absorbed orally
❑ well distributed to many tissues, pleural fluids, peritoneal
fluids, and CSF (variable - SMX 25-30%, TMP ~ 40%)
❑ variable protein binding (SMX 70%, TMP 44%)
❑ extensively metabolised in liver (acetylation, glucuronidation)
• both SMX and TMP metabolized by CYP 2C9 and 3A4
❑ Both excreted in urine (metabolites and unchanged) – dosage adjustment required in renal impairment

Good bioavailability
Comp levels to IV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

TMP/SMX Adverse Effects

GI
hematologic

A

❑ GI (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea) jaundice, hepatic necrosis

Hematologic
❑ anemia, agranulocytosis,
❑ thrombocytopenia,
❑ hemolytic anemia (G6PD deficiency)
(hematologic effects may be more severe in elderly and patients with HIV disease)
❑ Teratogenicity in pregnancy (contraindicated in 1
st and 3rd trimesters)
❑ kernicterus, infants (displacement of bilirubin from binding sites)
❑ photosensitivity - protect from sun

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

TMP/SMX Adverse Effects

which class of rxns more common

A

❑ Sulfonamide antibacterials can rarely cause
IgE-mediated reactions
❑ More commonly cause maculopapular rashes
❑ Maculopapular rashes occur at a rate of 1-3% in the
non-HIV population, but higher incidence in HIV patients

class 4
❑ Stevens-Johnson syndrome, erythema nodosum,
erythema multiforme
❑ vasculitis
❑ interstitial nephritis, tubular necrosis

hyperkalemia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

TMP/SMX

HIV Patients

A

❑ Hypersensitivity reactions develop in only ~ 1-3 % of
patients not infected with HIV, but 40-50% in HIV
❑ some literature as high as 20 - 80% patients infected with HIV
❑ ? Due to altered drug metabolism, reduced glutathione levels, or both
❑ Graded challenge with sulfamethoxazole may permit its use again (75% in one study)
❑ Patients may tolerate TMP/SMX with rapid induction of tolerance (desensitization)
❑ Patients with HIV more likely to develop anemia
associated with TMP/SMX

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

TMP/SMX testing for hypersensitibity

A

❑ Specific determinants of sulfonamide
hypersensitivity not known - no test available
❑ Repeated administration is not recommended after any life-threatening reaction (anaphylaxis, drug-induced
hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia,
immune-complex reactions, Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis)

  • agents that are used preferentially in certain agents, but there are other agents available and can switch
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Sulfonamide Antibiotic
Cross-Reactivity with
Non-Antibiotic Sulfonamide Drugs

(sulfa allergy)

A

although all sulfonamides contain an NH2
-SO2 moiety, sulfonamide antibiotics also contain an aromatic amine at the N4 position and a substituted ring at the N1 position”
❑ “these groups are believed to be essential for
various types of allergic reactions to sulfonamide
antibiotics”.

HCTZ, furosemide, COX2 inhibitors are diff from sulfamethoxazole

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Cross-reactivity with
Sulfonamide Antibacterials and
Sulfonamide Non-antibacterials

is there evidence to suggest cross-reactivity b/w sulfonamide abx and non-sulfonamide abx?

A

“ There is an association betweenhypersensitivity after the receipt of sulfonamide antibiotics and a subsequent allergic reaction after the receipt of a sulfonamide non-antibiotic, but, this association appears to be due to a predisposition to allergic reactions rather than to cross-reactivity with sulfonamide-based drugs.”

“ There is no evidence to suggest allergic cross-reactivity between sulfonamide antibiotics and non-antibiotic sulfonamides”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

confirm speciifc sulfa drug pt was allergic to

A

By comparison the OR for an allergic reaction after the receipt of a Rx for penicillin in those with a prior rxn to sulfonamides
compared to those without such a reaction was 7.8

These results suggest subsequent reaction
to nonantibiotic sulfonamides is probably a
predispostion to allergic reactions in general”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Testing for IgE Mediated Allergy

in Non-β-lactams

A

❑ Any non-β-lactam antibiotic has the potential of
causing an IgE-mediated reaction, but these appear
to occur less commonly than with β-lactam antibiotics
❑ There are no validated diagnostic tests for
evaluation of IgE-mediated reactions to non-βlactam antibiotics
❑ Evaluation of possible allergy should be limited to
situations when treatment with the drug is anticipated
(rather than electively as for penicillin)

 Skin testing with nonirritating concentrations
of non-β-lactams antibiotics is not standardized
 A negative test does not rule out the possibility of
an IgE immediate-type reaction
 A positive test suggests drug specific IgE antibodies by the predictive value is unknown
 Patient with a history of reactions to non-β-lactams antibiotics consistent with an IgE mediated mechanism should only receive them if an alternative is not available and only with rapid induction of drug tolerance

17
Q

Drug Interactions

TMP/SMX

A

Inhibitor of CYP2C9
❑ May substantially increase S-warfarin levels (increasing INR)
❑ (S enantiomer 2-5 x more potent than R)
❑ Either use alternative antibacterial; or
❑ Monitor and adjust dose if no other choice
❑ Zidovudine increases risk of hematologic effects.
❑ May increase levels of phenytoin
❑ possible hypoglycemia with sulfonylureas

18
Q

Nitrofurantoin

Macrodantin, Macrobid

A

Mechanism
❑ Reduced by bacterial flavoproteins to reactive
intermediates which alter bacterial ribosomal
proteins or other macromolecules
❑ Remarkably stable to the development of
resistance
doesnt conc much in tissues, absorbed and very little affects the gut bacteria

19
Q

Nitrofurantoin
kinetics
dose

A

Kinetics
❑ well absorbed, 2/3 rapidly metabolized in tissues, 1/3
unchanged in urine
❑ low serum levels, levels only effective for UTIs
❑ may be insufficient drug in urine if CrCl < 30-60 mL/min
Dose
❑ Macrodantin 50 - 100 mg qid
❑ Macrobid 100 mg bid (25% macrocrystals, 75% powde

20
Q

Nitrofurantoin spectrum

A
❑ S. aureus 99%
❑ E. faecalis 98%
❑ E. faecium 14%
❑ E. coli 96% (84% of ESBL producers)
❑ K. pneumoniae 32%
❑ P. mirabilis - R
21
Q

Nitrofurantoin AE

GI
hematologic

A

GI
❑ most common (take with food or milk)
❑ macrocrystals designed to ↓ peak ↓ nausea

Hepatotoxicity - rare
Hypersensitivity - rare
❑ Skin rash, anaphylaxis, drug fever, asthma
❑ pneumonitis (reversible)
❑ Chronic interstitial pulmonary fibrosis occasionally
(may be irreversible)

Hematologic
❑ hemolytic anemia with G6PD deficiency
❑ (not recommended in neonates < 1 month due to immature enzyme systems, at term in pregnancy, & women nursing infants < 1 month)
❑ Risk Factor B in pregnancy, except at term
❑ leukopenia, granulocytopenia, eosinophilia (rare)

22
Q

Nitrofurantoin AE

neurologic
urine

A
Neurologic
❑ ascending polyneuropathy with prolonged
therapy or if renal failure
Urine discolouration
❑ may be brown or rust-yellow
23
Q

Nitrofurantoin Drug Interactions

A
Uricosuric Agents
(Sulfinpyrazone, Probenecid)
❑ decrease excretion
❑ decrease effectiveness in UTI
❑ increase toxicity
24
Q

Fosfomycin Tromethamine
(Monurol®)
mechanism?

A

 Inhibits peptidoglycan cell wall synthesis at a

very early stage

25
Q

Fosfomycin Spectrum of Activity

A

 S. aureus, ? S. saprophyticus, Enterococci

 E. coli, Klebsiella, Serratia, Enterobacter,
Citrobacter

26
Q

Fosfomycin Resistance

A

 Develops frequently with multiple doses but not
as frequently with single doses
 Chromosomal
 decreased uptake into bacterial cell

Plasmid Mediated
 Catalytic conjugation with glutathione
 Little cross resistance with other antibacterials

some resetriction to ESBL prod E coli

27
Q

Fosfomycin Bioavail

A

 Bioavailability 34 - 65% (OK with food, but best without food if tolerated)
 No proteinbinding
 Large volume of distribution
 Excreted unchanged inurine
 Minor (0.5%) biliary excretion
 Peak urinary concentrations up to 4415mg/L
 Break point >128 mg/L

28
Q

Fosfomycin AE

A

 Well tolerated (only 3.1% adverseeffects)
 Mild, transient 1 - 2 days
 GI - diarrhea1.8%
 Hypernatremia with IV formulation (dosed several times a day
 Other - dizziness, headache
 Rarely
 Angioedema, asthma, aplastic anemia,
cholestatic jaundice, hepatic necrosis, toxic
megacolon
 Pregnancy category B