Titles Flashcards
How does adverse possession (AP) work?
You need:
- Continuous/uninterrupted possession
-> through statutory period (10, 15, 20 years)
-> seasonal use okay if consistent with the type of property being adversely possessed (e.g. vacation home) - Actual
-> open/notorious physical presence by AP, or another whose possession is attributable to AP
-> constructive AP gives title to whole - Hostile - must possess the land without owner’s permission
- Exclusivity - possession cannot be shared with true owner (or anyone acting on behalf of true owner)
Is tacking permitted under the continuous part of AP?
How do states differ on the hostile element of AP?
Can two or more people adversely possess property together under the exclusivity element of AP?
Continuous:
-> Tacking permitted, but no gaps and via non-hostile connections only (e.g. descent, devise, contract, or deed).
Hostile:
-> Majority of jurisdictions - ignore subjective intent, instead, must show objective intent to claim land as his own
-> Minority of jurisdictions - consider subjective intent:
—–> good faith - must believe the property is unowned or that he owns it
—-> bad faith - aggressive trespass
Exclusivity:
-> Yes and they’ll be tenants in common through adverse possession.
What is constructive adverse possession work?
Actual:
-> Normally adverse possessors only get adverse possession to the portion of land they adversely possess, HOWEVER constructive adverse possession allows adverse possessors to lay claim to the TITLE of the ENTIRE PROPERTY when:
—-> when adverse possessors enter the property under color of title (e.g. a facially valid deed that describes the entire property)
AND
—-> ACTUALLY possess a reasonable portion of the property for the statutory period.
Why is intent important with regards to transfer of a deed?
To transfer a real property interest, the grantor must demonstrate the intent to make a present transfer of the interest (e.g., delivery of the deed), and the grantee must accept the interest.
How can you demonstrate intent of grantor to make present transfer of property interest to grantee?
Is acceptance presumed for beneficial transfers to a grantee?
At time of transfer, grantor must intend to make present transfer of property interest to grantee
-> typically, intent is shown by delivery of the deed
-> execution and recording - creates a rebuttable presumption that the deed is to be presently operative
-> parol evidence admissible to establish intent when grantor keeps deed
Acceptance presumed for beneficial transfers.
When is delivery of the deed sufficient to show intent to transfer the deed:
-> transfer to grantor’s agent
-> transfer to grantee’s agent
-> transfer to a third party with a condition
Transfer to grantor’s agent is not delivery but transfer to grantee’s agent is.
Transfer to third party with a condition is not delivery IF
-> grantor keeps absolute right to recover deed,
BUT -> if not, treated like future property interest.
What must a grantor do to show intent to transfer the deed if the transfer of the deed is conditioned upon the death of the grantor?
When the third party’s transfer of the deed to the grantee is conditioned on the death of the grantor, the grantor’s transfer of the deed to the third party must evidence the intent to make a present gift.
What is a deed?
What are the requirements for a deed to be valid?
A legal instrument that transfers ownership in real property.
Valid deed requirements:
- identified parties (aka identification of the grantee)
- grantor’s signature
- words of transfer
- reasonably definite property description (extrinsic evidence is admissible)
Can real estate brokers prepare real estate sales Ks?
Can a non-attorney prepare mortgage lending docs?
Is an attorney requires to be present at closing? Can a non-attorney answer legal questions?
Many states allow real estate brokers to prepare real estate sales K; some states limit this to form Ks and some require attorney review
-> non-attorneys may prepare mortgage lending docs
-> jurisdictions are split as to requirement of attorney at closing, but non-attorney may not answer legal questions
What is the equal dignities rule?
Under the equal dignities rule, many states require a contract to pay a commission to a real estate agent or broker to be in writing because the underlying contract to sell the real property must be in writing.
What do recording acts do and are they required?
What are the three different types of recording acts?
Recording a deed is not required for a deed to be valid and convey good title to the transferee. BUT recording acts are state laws that help resolve multiple claims of ownership against a real property.
Three types of recording statutes are:
-> notice statute
-> race statute
-> race-notice statute
How does a notice statute work?
How does a race statute work?
How does a race-notice statute work?
- Notice statute
-> Bona Fide Purchaser (BFP) who is a purchaser for value without notice of prior interest PREVAILS over prior grantee who failed to record EVEN IF BFP DOES NOT RECORD
-> must record in order to protect own interest (aka previal) in real property against subsequent purchaser
-> e.g., of a notice statute => “no conveyance/mortgage of real property good against subsequent BFP unless same be recorded according to law” - Race statute (race to record it first)
-> first to record prevails - regardless of knowledge of prior conflicting interests
-> e.g., “no conveyance/mortgage of real property good against subsequent purchaser of value unless first recorded by law” - Race-notice statute
-> subsequent BFP protected only if he takes without notice of a prior interest AND is the first to record their interest
-> e.g., “no conveyance/mortgage of RP good against subsequent BFP unless first recorded by law”
If you’re a donee, then which statute applies to you in terms of recording statutes?
ONLY the race statute
-> notice and race-notice only protect BFPs
How does the Shelter Rule work?
Under the Shelter Rule, a person who receives a property interest from a BFP is entitled to the same protections under the recording act as the BFP
-> EVEN IF that person would not be protected by the recording act.
What is a wild deed?
Does the holder of a wild deed, who records prior to BFP, win against a BFP who has recorded the deed under the following statutes?
-> Notice statute
-> Race statute
-> Race-notice statute
A recorded deed that IS NOT in the “chain of title.” (meaning if you were to look it up then you wouldn’t see the previous chain that it should be attached to).
Notice
-> BFP wins because BFP (as long as BFP doesn’t have actual notice) doesn’t have record notice of conveyance that took place to create the wild deed
Race statute
-> Even if wild deed is recorded FIRST, BFP WINS because BFP doesn’t have notice of the wild deed (wild deed isn’t recorded because that is what makes it a wild deed)
Race-notice statute
-> BFP wins because lacks notice (notice statute) of wild deed and recording of a wild deed doesn’t do anything (race statute)