Thornburg V. Gingles Flashcards

1
Q

What did the North Carolina General Assembly do

A

The North Carolina General assembly enacted a legislative redistricting plan for the state Senate and House of Representatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What did the appellees argue?

A

Black citizens of North Carolina register to vote filed in federal district court challenging a one single member district and six multimember district because the redistricting plan impaired black citizens from being able to elect representatives of their choice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What law did this case violate

A

Section 2 of the voting rights act of 1965

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How did Mobile v Bolden affect this case

A

After the Mobile case Congress had amended the VRA of the results test. A clear violation of section 2 could be proven by showing “discriminatory effect “ rather than have to show a “discriminatory purpose “
and to establish as the relevant legal standard the “result test”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How was section 2a amended

A

Section 2 prohibits a state or political subdivision from imposing any voting qualifications or prerequisites to voting or any standard practices or procedures that result in the denial or abridgment of the right of any citizen to vote on the account of race or color

Vote denial and vote dilution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How was section 2b amended

A

Provides that section 2 is a violation when the totality of circumstances reveals that the political process leading to nomination or election are not equally open to participation by members of a protected class and that it’s members have less opportunity than other members of the electorate to participate in the political process to elect representatives of their choice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did the district court apply

A

The totality of circumstances test in section 2b that the redistricting plan violated this section because it resulted in the dilution of black citizens vote in disputed districts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

In order for minority voters to successfully claim multi member form of district in violate section 2 what must they prove?

A

Minority voters must prove that multimember electoral structure operates to minimize or cancel out minorities ability to elect a preferred candidate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What circumstances are needed to claim vote dilution?

A

A bloc voting majority must usually be able to defeat candidates supported by a “politically cohesive” and “geographically” insular minority group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What two things is needed for vote dilution

A

To ascertain whether minority group members constitute a politically cohesive unit and to determine whether white vote sufficiently as a blog usually to defeat the minorities preferred candidate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How can vote dilution be proven?

A

It must show that a significant number of minority group members usually vote for the same candidate is one way of proving political cohesiveness necessary to a vote dilution claim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the legal question

A

Whether a given district experiences legal significant racial black voting requires discrete inquiries into minority white practices

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

List the senate factors

A

The history of official discrimination in the jurisdiction that affects the right to vote
The degree to which voting in the jurisdiction is racially polarized
The extent to which the jurisdiction use of majority vote requirements usually large electoral districts provision on bullet voting and other devices at 10 to enhance opportunity for voting discrimination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Are there other senate factors

A

Whether minority candidates are denied access to the jurisdictions candidates slating process
The extent to which the jurisdictions minorities are discriminated against in Socio economic areas
Extensive which minority candidates have one elections
The degree that elected officials are unresponsive to the concerns of the minority group and whether the policy justification for challenging laws tenuous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was the opinion of the court

A

The Supreme Court announced that section 2 violations were in various state house district except North Carolina multimember district

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was established as a part of this case

A

the gingles test, Must show three precondition

17
Q

What are the three preconditions

A

The racial or language minority group sufficiently large and “geographically compact” to constitute a majority in a single member district, The minority group is “politically cohesive” - meaning its members tend to vote similarly- and the majority vote sufficiently as a block to enable it usually defeat the minorities preferred candidate “vote patterns”

18
Q

Compactness

A

Whether a majority minority district can be created because the racial or language minority group is sufficiently large and geographically compact to constitute a majority single member district

19
Q

Racially polarize voting

A

The minority group is politically cohesive

20
Q

What did the redistricting plan do?

A

The plan created 7 new districts where blacks would not be able to elect reps of their choosing

21
Q

What did congress amend in section 2

A

Voting violations needed only to have a “ discriminatory effect” and required no “discriminatory purpose”

22
Q

What did the district courts find in the Data

A

That black voters strongly supported black candidates whereas whites usually voted against black candidates the redistricting plan apportioned the politically cohesive groups of black voters into districts were blocks of white voters would consistently defeat the black candidates

23
Q

What happen right before the hearing

A

Congress amended section 2 of the voting rights act that stated voting violations needed “discriminatory effect” not “discriminatory purpose”

24
Q

What is the constitutional question

A

Did the North Carolina redistricting plan unlawfully discriminate against black Americans in 6 districts