Thornburg V. Gingles Flashcards
What did the North Carolina General Assembly do
The North Carolina General assembly enacted a legislative redistricting plan for the state Senate and House of Representatives
What did the appellees argue?
Black citizens of North Carolina register to vote filed in federal district court challenging a one single member district and six multimember district because the redistricting plan impaired black citizens from being able to elect representatives of their choice
What law did this case violate
Section 2 of the voting rights act of 1965
How did Mobile v Bolden affect this case
After the Mobile case Congress had amended the VRA of the results test. A clear violation of section 2 could be proven by showing “discriminatory effect “ rather than have to show a “discriminatory purpose “
and to establish as the relevant legal standard the “result test”
How was section 2a amended
Section 2 prohibits a state or political subdivision from imposing any voting qualifications or prerequisites to voting or any standard practices or procedures that result in the denial or abridgment of the right of any citizen to vote on the account of race or color
Vote denial and vote dilution
How was section 2b amended
Provides that section 2 is a violation when the totality of circumstances reveals that the political process leading to nomination or election are not equally open to participation by members of a protected class and that it’s members have less opportunity than other members of the electorate to participate in the political process to elect representatives of their choice
What did the district court apply
The totality of circumstances test in section 2b that the redistricting plan violated this section because it resulted in the dilution of black citizens vote in disputed districts
In order for minority voters to successfully claim multi member form of district in violate section 2 what must they prove?
Minority voters must prove that multimember electoral structure operates to minimize or cancel out minorities ability to elect a preferred candidate
What circumstances are needed to claim vote dilution?
A bloc voting majority must usually be able to defeat candidates supported by a “politically cohesive” and “geographically” insular minority group
What two things is needed for vote dilution
To ascertain whether minority group members constitute a politically cohesive unit and to determine whether white vote sufficiently as a blog usually to defeat the minorities preferred candidate
How can vote dilution be proven?
It must show that a significant number of minority group members usually vote for the same candidate is one way of proving political cohesiveness necessary to a vote dilution claim
What is the legal question
Whether a given district experiences legal significant racial black voting requires discrete inquiries into minority white practices
List the senate factors
The history of official discrimination in the jurisdiction that affects the right to vote
The degree to which voting in the jurisdiction is racially polarized
The extent to which the jurisdiction use of majority vote requirements usually large electoral districts provision on bullet voting and other devices at 10 to enhance opportunity for voting discrimination
Are there other senate factors
Whether minority candidates are denied access to the jurisdictions candidates slating process
The extent to which the jurisdictions minorities are discriminated against in Socio economic areas
Extensive which minority candidates have one elections
The degree that elected officials are unresponsive to the concerns of the minority group and whether the policy justification for challenging laws tenuous
What was the opinion of the court
The Supreme Court announced that section 2 violations were in various state house district except North Carolina multimember district