Third Party Issues Flashcards
3rd Party Beneficiaries - Overview
A 3rd party that benefits from a K entered into between other parties is a TPB
Intended: Parties to the K intend for TPB to benefit from the K (TPB has rights under the K)
Incidental: Stands to benefit from K although not intended by parties to the K; has no rights under the K
3rd Party Beneficiaries - Determining TPB Status (Factors Courts Look At - 4)
a) Is TPB expressly designated in the K?
b) Does TPB directly benefit from some performance under the K?
c) Does TPB have rights under the K?
d) Does TPB stand in such a relationship to the promise under the K that an intent to benefit the third party can be inferred?
- If answer to any of the above is “yes” more likely that TPB is intended
3rd Party Beneficiaries - TPB Characteristics
Not parties to the K; TPBs are merely beneficiaries
Intended TPBs have a right to sue for breach of K even though they are not parties to the K
3rd Party Beneficiaries - Creditor TPBs
Benefit is conferred based on a debt owed by the promisee to the K
3rd Party Beneficiaries - Donee TPBs
Benefit is conferred gratuitously
Rights of 3rd Party Beneficiaries - Vesting of Rights (3 Ways)
Occurs when the TPB either:
a) Accepts benefits: accepts the benefits of the K in a manner requested by the parties to the K,
b) Sues to Enforce: brings suit to enforce the K, or
c) Detrimental Reliance: Detrimentally relies on the K (i.e. materially changes position in justifiable reliance on the K)
Rights of 3rd Party Beneficiaries - Enforcing the K
TPB can sue promisor
- Promisor can assert any of his own defenses
Promisee can sue promisor at law and in equity for specific performance
Creditor beneficiary can sue promises on existing obligation between them
Donee beneficiary may only sue promises if detrimental reliance exists
Assignment - Overview
An assignment is a transfer of rights under a K to a 3rd Party after the K is formed
- A party (assignor) can assign rights under a K to a third party (assignee), who is now in a K with remaining party (obligor)
Consideration: Not required, but assignment without consideration is considered gratuitous
Assignor can only transfer the rights they have in a K at the time of assignment
Assignment - Common Law Limitations
Common Law bars any assignment that substantially changes the duties of the obligor
– Assignment of payment is not a substantial change
– Assignment of rights fails if the obligor’s risk is substantially altered
Assignment - K Limitations on Assignment (Clauses - Non-assignment of K)
Bars delegation of assignor’s duties only (i.e. does not prohibit assignment of rights)
Assignment - K Limitations on Assignment (Clauses - Non-assignment of Rights)
Bars right to assign, but not the power to assign (i.e. assignment, obligor may assignor for breach)
Assignment - K Limitations on Assignment (Clauses - Assignment as Void)
Assignment will be ineffective (i.e. assignor has neither power nor right to assign)
Revocability - Definition
Gratuitous Assignments may be revocable however, assignments made for consideration are irrevocable
Revocability - Assignments for Consideration
Irrevocable
Revocability - Gratuitous Assignments
Revocable