Third Parties to Contracts Flashcards
Intended v. Incidental Beneficiaries
only intended beneficiaries have contractual rights
To determine whether a beneficiary is intended, consider whether the beneficiary is
1) identified in the contract
2) receives performance directly from the promisor
3) has some relationship with the promisee to indicate the intent to benefit
GA Third Party Intended Beneficiary Determination
Under GA law, it must clearly appear that both parties to the contract intended that the third party should be a beneficiary of the contract for the third party to have standing.
The contract must expressly specify and identify the person as a third party beneficiary
– the mere fact that the third party would indirectly benefit is not sufficient
Creditor v. Donee Beneficiary
A creditor beneficiary is a person to whom a debt is owed by the promisee
a donee beneficiary is a person whom the promisee intends to benefit gratuitously
Rights of Third Party Beneficiaries
A beneficiary may sue the promisor on the contract & the promisor may raise defenses that it could assert against the promisee
A creditor beneficiary can sue the promisee on the existing obligation between them or the promisor under the beneficiary contract, but they may obtain only one satisfaction
a donee beneficiary has no right t sue the promisee unless grounds for detrimental reliance exist
A promisee may sue the promisor both at law and in equity for specific performance if the promisor isn’t performing for the third party
When do third party rights vest
A third party beneficiary can only enforce a contract if their rights have vested
vesting occurs when
– with knowledge of the contract, they manifest their assent to the contract in the manner requested by the parties
– the third party brings suit to enforce the contract
– with knowledge of the contract, the third party materially changed position in justifiable reliance on the contract
Significance of Vesting
prior to vesting, the contracting parties are free to modify, rescind, and remove the third party without consulting the third party
Once the rights have vested, the parties cannot modify or vary the rights of the third party without his consent
When can you make an assignment
Generally, all contractual rights may be assigned
EXCEPTIONS
– An assignment that would substantially change the obligor’s duty or risk
– an assignment of future right to arise from future contracts
– an assignment that is prohibited by law
GA Assignments
In GA, unless the contract is for personal services or requires particular skill or qualifications, once a party to a contract performs to that the contract is no longer executory, the right to enforce the contract may be assigned without the other party’s consent, even if the contract contains a non-assignment clause
Effect of Assignment
An assignment establishes privity of contract between the obligor and assignee while extinguishing privity between the obligor and assignor
once the obligor has knowledge of the assignment, he must render performance or payment to the assignee
What is necessary for an assignment
For an assignment to be effective, the assignor must manifest an intent to immediately and completely transfer their rights
– a writing is generally not required
– consideration is not required
Is an assignment revocable or irrevocable
Assignment for Value - an assignment for value is (1) given for consideration or (2) taken as security or payment of a preexisting debt
– An assignment for value cannot be revoked
Gratuitous Assignment - This is an assignment not for value
– Gratuitous assignments are generally revocable
Exceptions to Revocability for Gratuitous Assignments
A gratuitous assignment is irrevocable if:
1) the obligor has already performed
2) a token chose is delivered
3) an assignment of a simple chose is put into writing; or
4) the assignee can show detrimental reliance on the assignment
How can a gratuitous assignment be revoked
A revocable gratuitous assignment may be revoked by
1) death or bankruptcy of the assignor
2) notice of revocation by the assignor to the assignee or obligor
3) the assignor taking performance directly from the obligor
4) subsequent assignment of the same right by the assignor to another
Contractual Provisions Against Assignment
1) an clause prohibiting an assignment of “the contract” will be construed as baring only delegation of the assignor’s duties
2) a clause prohibiting assignment of “contractual rights” generally does not bar assignment, but rather gives the obligor the right to sue for damages
3) if the contract provides that attempts to assign “will be void” - the parties can bar assignments
4) If the assignee has notice of the non-assignment clause, an assignment will be ineffective
Rights of Assignee
The assignee can sue the obligor because it its the assignee (not the assignor) who is owed performance under the contract
– the obligor has any defense inherent in the contract and any it has against the assignor
– the obligor cannot raise a defense the assignor may have against the assignee