THIRD CONCEPT: THE COMPONENTS OF THE WILL (WHAT MAKES UP THE WILL?)

Question 1

Define integration (for wills)

Answer 1

the papers that make up the will

Question 2

If you have a will written on only one piece of paper, is there an issue of integration?

Answer 2

No

Question 3

if testator executes a 10-page will is there a question of integration?

Answer 3

Yes

Question 4

What are the Two elements required for papers to be integrated?

Answer 4

[1] Intent: Testator must have intended for the papers in question to be part of the will; and
[2] Presence: The paper must have been actually or physically present at the time of execution.

Question 5

Testator goes to lawyer’s office to execute his typed 10-page will. Upon reading it testator states to lawyer that page five does not manifest his intent. Lawyer tells testator to execute the will as it is, and promises tomorrow to have the secretary type a new page five which will be inserted and which
will manifest testator’s intent. This happens. The next day the secretary types new page five and inserts it in the will. Testator dies. What result?

Answer 5

Only pages 1-4 and 6-10 are probated. Old page 5: is not probated, because it was not integrated: T did not intend old page 5 to be part of his will. New page 5: is not probated because it was not integrated because it was not physically present when testator executed his will.

Question 6

What are the 2 ways of proving integration of a will?

Answer 6

[a] Establish a physical connection among all the pages.
[b] Establish a logical connection: Does the last word on page 1 make sense in relation to the first word on page 2? If so, integration is inferred.

Question 7

If the papers are stapled together, it is inferred that testator intended the papers to be part of the will and were physically present at the time of execution. What kind of integration is this an example of?

Answer 7

Establishing a physical connection among all the pages

Question 8

What is incorporation by reference?

Answer 8

a non-integrated writing is given testamentary effect and becomes part of the will.

Question 9

Testator’s will states, “I leave my property to the grantee named on the ABC deed.” what is this an example of?

Answer 9

incorporation by reference

Question 10

Testator’s will states, “I leave my property to the grantee named on the ABC deed.” Problem: From the 4 corners of the will, we do not know who the grantee of the deed is. Can’t we always admit in parol evidence to ascertain his or her identity?

Answer 10

No, because the integrity of the Statute of Wills (California Probate Code) would be undermined. But in this hypo, we actually can admit the deed into probate and, thus, determine who the beneficiary is. How can we do so? We can do so under the doctrine of incorporation by reference. (look at who is listed as owner on the ABC deed)

Question 11

Elements to incorporation by reference what are the Four Elements?

Answer 11

[1] A document or a writing;
[2] The document or writing must have been in existence when the will was executed;
[3] The document must be clearly identified in the will; and
[4] Testator must have intended to incorporate the document into the will.
(If you establish elements 1-3 four will be implied by the court.)

Question 12

“I leave my property to the grantee named on the ABC deed” What if ABC deed is an invalid deed?

Answer 12

This is irrelevant. The document does not have to valid for what it purports to stand for. Thus, you can incorporate by reference an invalid deed,
an invalid contract, or even an invalid will of the testator or of a third person.

Question 13

Facts of Independent Significance, what is the Theory and definition of doctrine?

Answer 13

Who a beneficiary is, or what gift is given, may be given meaning by facts of significance independent from testator’s will.

Question 14

T’s will states I leave all my property to the church i am a member of at the time of my death. What is the problem with this will?

Answer 14

from the 4 corners of the will we cannot determine the identity of the church.

Question 15

T’s will states I leave all my property to the church i am a member of at the time of my death.
from the 4 corners of the will we cannot determine the identity of the church. Can we admit parol evidence? Why or why not?

Answer 15

NO we cannot simply parol evidence because we are concerned about the integrity of the Statute of Wills. However, because the fact of what church he belonged to at the time of his death is of independent significance from the will, we can admit as parol evidence that is trustworthy regarding his church status.

Question 16

Why would joining a church be a independent fact of legal significance?

Answer 16

people do not join a church just to validate a devise in a will; they join a church for reasons independent of the will. Because of these independent reasons for joining a church, there is truthfulness to such fact or act. Therefore, this fact or act is susceptible of independent verification. As such, there is no concern for fraud.

Question 17

What do facts of independent legal significance allow the court to do?

Answer 17

Facts of independent significance allow courts to fill blanks of T’s will with parol evidence that is trust worthy.

Question 18

When do you use the doctine of independent fact of legal significance? (what question should you ask?)

Answer 18

Even without the will, would this fact had existed?

Question 19

“I leave all my property to the people who are in my employ at the time of my death.” Is it a fact of independent significance? Why or why not?

Answer 19

Yes. From the 4 corners of the will we do not know
who these people are. Yet, it is a fact of independent significance Because even without the will, these people would . As such, we can admit this parol evidence

Question 20

“I leave my car to John” Is this a fact of independent legal significance? why or why not?

Answer 20

Yes, The car is fact of independent significance. At testator’s death, John will take whatever car testator owned because people own cars for many reasons, none of which have anything to do with the law of wills.

Question 21

“I leave all my property to people I had Thanksgiving dinner with in 1999.” Is this a fact of independent legal significance?

Answer 21

Yes, This is a past fact, independent of testator’s will.

Question 22

T’s will states “I leave all my property to the people on a note tomorrow.” Is this a fact of independent legal significance? Can it be incorporated? why or why not for each.

Answer 22

No, Independent significance will not work because without the will, this note would not exist. The note is not a fact of independent significance.
No, Incorporation by reference will not work because the note was not in existence at the time the will was executed.

Question 23

California Probate Code section 6132 allows what?

Answer 23

a writing, whether or not it can be incorporated by reference or is a fact of independent significance, may be admitted into probate and, thus, given testamentary effect.

Question 24

What are the 4 elements needed under section 6132?

Answer 24

[1] First Element: The writing must be (i) referred to in the will, (ii) dated, and (iii) either signed or handwritten by the testator;
[2] Second Element: The writing must describe the items and recipients (beneficiaries) with reasonable certainty;
[3] Third Element: The writing may be executed before or after the will;
[4] Fourth Element: The writing directs the disposition of tangible personal property (excluding cash and property used primarily in a trade or business) valued, at the time of testator’s death, at not more than $5,000 per item and not more than $25,000 in the aggregate.

Question 25

udner section 6132 even if the writing is not dated or neither handwritten nor signed by the testator, the writing can still be admitted into probate and given testamentary effect if what?

Answer 25

if extrinsic evidence establishes the testator’s intent regarding disposition of the items described in the referenced writing;

Question 26

Testator’s will states: “I give my car to the person who is identified on a note I executed yesterday.” The writing (i.e. the note), signed and dated by testator, states: “2003 Honda CR-V: Mary Jones.” At the time of testator’s death, the car is not business property and is worth not more than $5,000. What should you discuss on the bar exam? (what theories?)

Answer 26

discuss whether the writing can be admitted into probate, thus allowing Mary to take the gift. Discuss under 3 theories: Incorporation by reference Facts of independent significance Section 6132

Question 27

Testator’s will states: “I give my car to the person who is identified on a note I executed yesterday.” The writing (i.e. the note), signed and dated by testator, states: “2003 Honda CR-V: Mary Jones.” At the time of testator’s death, the car is not business property and is worth not more than $5,000. What is the analysis for Incorporation by reference?

Answer 27

(State the elements of incorporation by reference) [1] A document or a writing; [2] The document or writing must have been in existence when the will was executed; [3] The document must be clearly identified in the will; and [4] Testator must have intended to incorporate the document into the will. We have a writing, in existence when the will was executed, clearly identified in the will, and intended by testator to be incorporated. Thus, incorporation works.

Question 28

Testator’s will states: “I give my car to the person who is identified on a note I executed yesterday.” The writing (i.e. the note), signed and dated by testator, states: “2003 Honda CR-V: Mary Jones.” At the time of testator’s death, the car is not business property and is worth not more than $5,000. What is the analysis for Facts of independent significance?

Answer 28

Who a beneficiary is, or what gift is given, may be given meaning by facts of significance independent from testator’s will. Apart from the will, the note has no significance. While the car can be a fact of independent significance, the name of the beneficiary clearly is not. Thus, this is just a variation of, “I leave all my property to the people I will name on a note tomorrow” In short, but for the will, this note would not exist. Thus facts of independent significance will not work.

Question 29

Testator’s will states: “I give my car to the person who is identified on a note I executed yesterday.” The writing (i.e. the note), signed and dated by testator, states: “2003 Honda CR-V: Mary Jones.” At the time of testator’s death, the car is not business property and is worth not more than $5,000. What is the analysis for section 6132?

Answer 29

Irrespective of incorporation and independent significance, the writing is referred to in the will; dated, and signed by the testator; describes the property and the recipient with reasonable certainty; and is personal tangible property not used in testator’s business worth not more than $5,000. Thus, section 6132 works.

Question 30

What is a pour over will?

Answer 30

That means that part or all of testator’s estate is devised to the trustee of the inter-vivos trust, to be administered pursuant to the terms of that trust.

Question 31

On January 1, testator executes a document creating the ABC Trust, an inter-vivos trust (an inter-vivos trust in this context is a trust created by testator during testator’s lifetime). On January 2, testator executes his will. In the will, testator devises part or all of his estate, “To the trustee of the ABC Trust, to be administered pursuant to the terms of that trust.” Testator dies. [a] Who is the trustee of this trust? [b] Who are the beneficiaries? [c] What are the terms of the trust?

Answer 31

From the four corners of the will, we do not know. And remember, generally speaking, we cannot just admit parol evidence whenever we want to because we are concerned with maintaining the integrity of the Statute of Wills.

Question 32

On January 1, testator executes a document creating the ABC Trust, an inter-vivos trust (an inter-vivos trust in this context is a trust created by testator during testator’s lifetime). On January 2, testator executes his will. In the will, testator devises part or all of his estate, “To the trustee of the ABC Trust, to be administered pursuant to the terms of that trust.” Testator dies. How do we get the trust instrument admitted into probate?

Answer 32

[1] Incorporation by reference [2] Independent Significance [3] Uniform Testamentary Additions To Trusts Act (UTATA)

Question 33

On January 1, testator executes a document creating the ABC Trust, an inter-vivos trust (an inter-vivos trust in this context is a trust created by testator during testator’s lifetime). On January 2, testator executes his will. In the will, testator devises part or all of his estate, “To the trustee of the ABC Trust, to be administered pursuant to the terms of that trust.” Testator dies. How do we get the trust instrument admitted into probate through Incorporation by reference?

Answer 33

we have a trust instrument in writing, in existence when the will was executed, clearly identified in the will, and T intended to incorporate the trust instrument into the will. Thus, the trust instrument will be admitted into probate and the pour-over provision will be validated.

Question 34

On January 1, testator executes a document creating the ABC Trust, an inter-vivos trust (an inter-vivos trust in this context is a trust created by testator during testator’s lifetime). On January 2, testator executes his will. In the will, testator devises part or all of his estate, “To the trustee of the ABC Trust, to be administered pursuant to the terms of that trust.” Testator dies. How do we get the trust instrument admitted into probate through Independent Significance?

Answer 34

Even without the will, we would still have this intervivos trust. The trust instrument, therefore, is a fact of significance independent from the will. Thus, the pour-over provision can be validated on this theory, too.

Question 35

On January 1, testator executes a document creating the ABC Trust, an inter-vivos trust (an inter-vivos trust in this context is a trust created by testator during testator’s lifetime). On January 2, testator executes his will. In the will, testator devises part or all of his estate, “To the trustee of the ABC Trust, to be administered pursuant to the terms of that trust.” Testator dies. How do we get the trust instrument admitted into probate through Uniform Testamentary Additions To Trusts Act (UTATA)?

Answer 35

So long as you have a valid trust, which was in existence before the will was executed, or at the time of execution, the pour-over provision is valid by statute. The pour-over provision is valid simply because the statute says it is valid.

Question 36

On January 1, testator creates the inter-vivos trust. On January 2 testator executes the will, devising part or all of her estate to “the trustee of the ABC Trust, to be administered pursuant to the terms of the trust.” On January 3, testator modifies the trust. Thereafter, testator dies. How do we validate the pour-over provision? Will incorporation work? Why or why not?

Answer 36

Incorporation will not work the trust as modified was not in existence when the will was executed

Question 37

On January 1, testator creates the inter-vivos trust. On January 2 testator executes the will, devising part or all of her estate to “the trustee of the ABC Trust, to be administered pursuant to the terms of the trust.” On January 3, testator modifies the trust. Thereafter, testator dies. How do we validate the pour-over provision? Will Facts of independent significance work? Why or why not?

Answer 37

Facts of independent significance works. The trust as modified is still a fact of significance independent from the will. Even without the will, there would be this trust.

Question 38

On January 1, testator creates the inter-vivos trust. On January 2 testator executes the will, devising part or all of her estate to “the trustee of the ABC Trust, to be administered pursuant to the terms of the trust.” On January 3, testator modifies the trust. Thereafter, testator dies. How do we validate the pour-over provision? Will UTATA work?

Answer 38

UTATA works: Under the act, a pour-over provision is valid even if the trust is subsequently modified. Why? Because the statute says so. "So long as you have a valid trust, which was in existence before the will was executed, or at the time of execution, the pour-over provision is valid by statute."